Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 55-59

  Osborne, Nicola J ^a   Payne, Daisy ^a   Newman, Michael L ^b  

^a Research Animals Department   (United Kingdom)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3Rs; Animal welfare; Ethics of animal use; Peer reviewed journals

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; ETHICS; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 67649472092     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160903318343     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alfaro, V. 2005. Specification of laboratory animal use in scientific articles: Current low detail in the journals' instructions for authors and some proposals. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 27(7): 495-502.
2. American Heart Association (AHA). 2005. Guidelines of Research Involving Animal Use. Dallas, TX: AHA.
3. American Physiological Society (APS). 2000. Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals. Bethesda, MD: APS.
4. Animal Procedures Committee (APC). 2003. Review of the Cost Benefit Assessment in the Use of Animals in Research, ed. Communications Directorate Home Office, Report of the Cost-Benefit Working Group of the Animals Procedures Committee. London, UK: APC.
5. Boisvert, D. P. J. 1997. Editorial policies and animal welfare. In Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics, eds. L. F. M van Zutphen and M. Balls. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 399-404.
6. Buck, V. 2007. Who will start the 3Rs ball rolling for animal welfare? Nature 446: 856.
7. Canadian Council of Animal Care (CCAC). 1993. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Ontario, Canada: CCAC.
8. Committee on Publication Ethics(COPE).1999.Guide lines on Good Publication Practice, COPE Report 2003, 1999. Ontario, Canada: COPE.
9. Council of Europe. 2007. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes (ETS No 123). Strasbourg, CEDEX: Council of Europe.
10. Council for the International Organizations of Medical Research (CIOMR). 1985. International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. Geneva, Switzerland: CIOMR.
11. European Commission. 1986. European Communities Council Directive 86/609/Eec. Official Journal of the European Commission L358, 18/12/1986, p. 0001-0028.
12. Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS). 1988. Guide for the Care and Use of Agriculture Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. Savoy, IL: FASS.
13. Festing, M. F. W, V. Baumans, R. D. Combes. et al. 1998. Reducing the use of laboratory animals in biomedical research: Problems and possible solutions-The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 29. Atla-Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 26(3): 283-301.
14. Festing, M. F. W., and B. van Zutphen. 1999. Workshop 15: Update on policies of journals. In Proceedings of the Third World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences 27(special issue July 1999): 203.
15. Festing, M. F. W., and L. F. M. van Zutphen. 1997. Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts on studies involving live animals. Synopsis of the workshop. In Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics, eds. L. F. M. van Zutphen and M. Balls. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 405-410.
16. FRAME Reduction Committee. 1999. Proposed Guidelines for Scientific Journals Publishing Papers Involving the Use of Laboratory Animals.Nottingham, UK: FRAME.
17. Home Office. 1986. UK Animals Scientific Procedures Act.
18. Institute for Laboratory Animal Resources (ILAR). 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
19. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). 1982. Ethical Guidelines for Investigations of Experimental Pain in Conscious Animals.Seattle, WA: IASP.
20. Japanese Ministry of EducationCulture Sports Science and Technology, Science and International Affairs Bureau. 1987. Animal Experiments inUniversities (NotificationNo. 141). Japan. Japanese Ministry of Education Culture Sports Science and Technology.
21. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2005. The Ethics of Research Involving Animals. London, UK: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
22. Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) Public Health Service (PHS). 2002. Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. OLAW PHS. Bethesda, MD: NIH.
23. Perry, M. 1988. Revised Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. Australian Veterinary Journal 76: 286.
24. Primate Society of Japan. 1986. Guiding principles for animal ex-periments using non-human primates. Primate Research 2: 111-113.
25. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA). 2005. The State of Animal Welfare in the UK. Southwater, UK: RSPCA.
26. Russell, W. M. S., and R. L. Burch. 1959. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 1st ed., ed. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. London, UK: Methuen & Co Ltd.
27. Society for Neuroscience. 1991. Handbook for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience Research. Washington DC: SFN.
28. Society for Toxicology. 1999. Guiding Principles in the Use of Animals in Toxicology. Reston, VA: Society for Toxicology.
29. UnitedKingdom(UK)BiologicalCouncil.1984.GuidelinesontheUse of Living Animals in Scientific Investigations. London, UK: Biological Council, Institute of Biology.
30. UK Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR). 1997. Guidelines for the Welfare of Animals in Experimental Neoplasia. London, UK: UKCCCR.
31. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW). 1999. Hand book on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, 7th ed., vol. 1., eds. T. Poole and P. English. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.
32. Wurbel, H. 2007. Publications should include an animal-welfare section. Nature 446: 257.