Rejoinder: The Madness to Our Method: Some Thoughts on Divergent Thinking

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 109-114

  Silvia, Paul J ^a   Winterstein, Beate P ^a   Willse, John T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71549165533     PISSN: 19313896     EISSN: 1931390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.109     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ackerman P.L. New developments in understanding skilled performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (2007) 235-239
2. Ackerman P.L., and Beier M.E. Trait complexes, cognitive investment, and domain knowledge. In: Sternberg R.J., and Grigorenko E.L. (Eds). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (2003), Cambridge University Press, New York 1-30
3. Baer J. Commentary: Divergent thinking tests have problems, but this is not the solution. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (2008) 89-92
4. Bereiter C., and Scardamalia M. The psychology of written composition (1987), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
5. Campbell D.T., and Fiske D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56 (1959) 81-105
6. Carroll J.B. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies (1993), Cambridge University Press, New York
7. Clapham M.M. The convergent validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and Creative Interest Inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 (2004) 828-841
8. Cronbach L.J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 12 (1957) 671-684
9. DeYoung C.G. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91 (2006) 1138-1151
10. Ericsson K.A. Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry 10 (1999) 329-333
11. Ericsson K.A., and Ward P. Capturing the naturally occurring superior performance of experts in the laboratory: Toward a science of expert and exceptional performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (2007) 346-350
12. Guilford J.P. The nature of human intelligence (1967), McGraw-Hill, New York
13. Kaufman J.C., and Baer J. Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
14. Kim K.H. Can only intelligent people be creative?. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 16 (2005) 57-66
15. Kim K.H. Commentary: The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking already overcome many of the perceived weaknesses that Silvia et al.'s (2008) methods are intended to correct. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (2008) 97-99
16. Kogan N. Commentary: Divergent-thinking research and the Zeitgeist. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (2008) 100-102
17. Kozbelt A. Factors affecting aesthetic success and improvement in creativity: A case study of the musical genres of Mozart. Psychology of Music 33 (2005) 235-255
18. Kozbelt A. A quantitative analysis of Beethoven as self-critic: Implications for psychological theories of musical creativity. Psychology of Music 35 (2007) 144-168
19. Lee S. Commentary: Reliability and validity of uniqueness scoring in creativity assessment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (2008) 103-108
20. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist 50 (1995) 741-749
21. Mumford M.D., Vessey W.B., and Barrett J.D. Commentary: Measuring divergent thinking: Is there really one solution to the problem?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (2008) 86-88
22. Plucker J.A. Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal 12 (1999) 103-114
23. Plucker J.A. The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In: Kaufman J.C., and Baer J. (Eds). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 307-312
24. Pretz, J. E., & Link, J. A. (in press). The creative task generator: A tool for the generation of customized, Web-based creativity tasks. Behavior Research Methods
25. Runco M.A. Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (2008) 93-96
26. Silvia P.J. Creativity and intelligence revisited: A latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal 20 (2008) 34-39
27. Silvia P.J., Winterstein B.P., Willse J.T., Barona C.M., Cram J.T., Hess K.I., et al. Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 2 (2008) 68-85
28. Simonton D.K. Expertise, competence, and creative ability: The perplexing complexities. In: Sternberg R.J., and Grigorenko E.L. (Eds). The psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (2003), Cambridge University Press, New York 213-239
29. Sternberg R.J. The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 18 (2006) 87-98
30. Torrance E.P. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual, verbal forms A and B (2008), Scholastic Testing Service, Bensenville, IL
31. Wallach M.A., and Kogan N. Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction (1965), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York
32. Weisberg R.W. Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts (2006), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
33. Wothke W. Models for multitrait-multimethod matrix analysis. In: Marcoulides G.A., and Schumacker R.E. (Eds). Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (1996), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 7-56