Effect of four-day psyllium supplementation on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective double blind randomized trial [ISRCTN76623768]

BMC Gastroenterology

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Salwen, Walter A ^a   Basson, Marc D ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLYTE; ISPAGULA; MACROGOL; PLACEBO; WATER;

ABDOMINAL CRAMP; ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON LAVAGE; COLONOSCOPY; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DIETARY FIBER; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; DRUG TOLERABILITY; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEARTBURN; HEMORRHOID; HUMAN; MALE; METEORISM; NAUSEA; PATIENT SELECTION; POWDER; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RACE DIFFERENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SEX DIFFERENCE;

CATHARTICS; COLONOSCOPY; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYLLIUM; THERAPEUTIC IRRIGATION;

EID: 2442655320     PISSN: 1471230X     EISSN: 1471230X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-4-2     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003, 53:5-26.
2. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinovich DR, Bratcher LL: Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1696-1700.
3. McRorie J, Zorich N, Riccardi K, Bishop L, Filloon T, Wason S, Giannella R: Effects of olestra and sorbitol consumption on objective measures of diarrhea: impact of stool viscosity on common gastrointestinal symptoms. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2000, 31:59-67.
4. Lee J, McCallion K, Acheson AG, Irwin ST: A prospective randomised study comparing polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate bowel cleansing solutions for colonoscopy. Ulster Med J 1999, 68:68-72.
5. Davis GR, Santa Ana CA, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS: Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion. Gastroenterology 1980, 78:991-995.
6. Reddy DN, Rao GV, Sriram PV: Efficacy and safety of oral sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Indian J Gastroenterol 2002, 21:219-221.
7. Barclay RL, Depew WT, Vanner SJ: Carbohydrate-electrolyte rehydration protects against intravascular volume contraction during colonic cleansing with orally administered sodium phosphate. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 56:633-638.
8. Poon CM, Lee DW, Mak SK, Ko CW, Chan KC, Chan KW, Sin KS, Chan AC: Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2002, 34:560-563.
9. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R, Dehe M, Mayer G, Schneider B, Albrecht U, Schuette W: A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*). Endoscopy 2003, 35:300-304.
10. Adams WJ, Meagher AP, Lubowski DZ, King DW: Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation. Dis Colon Rectum 1994, 37:229-33; discussion 233-41