ACR BI-RADS® for Breast Imaging Communication: A Roadmap for the Rest of Radiology

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 861-863

  Langlotz, Curtis P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CARE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEALTH PROGRAM; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LAW; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION;

EID: 71549126806     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.015     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Fuchs V.R., and Sox Jr. H.C. Physicians' views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff (Millwood) 20 (2001) 30-42
2. Bhargavan M., Kaye A.H., Forman H.P., and Sunshine J.H. Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006-2007 and trends since 1991-1992. Radiology 252 (2009) 458-467
3. Dunnick N.R., and Langlotz C.P. The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol 5 (2008) 626-629
4. Berg W.A., D'Orsi C.J., Jackson V.P., et al. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography?. Radiology 224 (2002) 871-880
5. Rosenberg R.D., Yankaskas B.C., Abraham L.A., et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology 241 (2006) 55-66
6. Boonn W., Nagy P., and Langlotz C.P. Radiologist use of and perceived need for patient data access. J Digit Imaging 22 (2009) 357-362
7. Sobel J., Pearson M., Gross K., et al. Information content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 3 (1996) 709-717
8. Clinger N., Hunter T., and Hillman B. Radiology reporting: attitudes of referring physicians. Radiology 169 (1988) 825-826
9. Berlin L. Communicating radiology results. Lancet 367 (2006) 373-375
10. American College of Radiology. Physicians Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI). http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/p4p/FeaturedCategories/P4PInitiatives/ValueBasedPurchasing/pqri.aspx Accessed September 24, 2009
11. Joint Commission. Patient safety requirement 2C (standard NPSG.2a). The 2007 comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: the official handbook (2007), Joint Commission Resources, Oakbrook Terrace, Ill NPSG-3-NPSG-4
12. Bhan S.N., Coblentz C.L., Norman G.R., and Ali S.H. Effect of voice recognition on radiologist reporting time. Can Assoc Radiol J 59 (2008) 203-209
13. Johnson A.J., Chen M.Y., Swan J.S., Applegate K.E., and Littenberg B. Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253 (2009) 74-80
14. Langlotz C.P. RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 26 (2006) 1595-1597
15. Kahn C.E., Langlotz C.P., Burnside E.S., et al. Towards best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 252 (2009) 852-856
16. ACR. National Radiology Data Registry. https://nrdr.acr.org/portal/Nrdr/Main/page.aspx Accessed August 31, 2009
17. Weiss D.L., and Langlotz C.P. Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare?. Radiology 249 (2008) 739-747
18. Langlotz C.P. Structured radiology reporting: are we there yet?. Radiology 253 (2009) 23-25