Sensory approach to measure fragrance intensity on the skin

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 871-901

  Cortez Pereira, Claudia Silva ^a,b   Baby, André Rolim ^b   Kaneko, Telma Mary ^a   Velasco, Maria Valéria Robles ^a  

^a Monsanto do Brasil Ltda   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71549116394     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00242.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AXEL, R. BUCK, L. 1991. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor reception. Cell 65 (1 175 187.
2. BARTOSHUK, L.M., DUFFY, V.B., GREEN, B.G., HOFFMAN, H.J., KO, C.-W., LUCCHINA, L.A., MARKS, L.E., SNYDER, D.J. WEIFFENBACH, J.M. 2004. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gloms versus magnitude matching. Physiol. Behav. 82, 109 114.
3. BORG, G. 1982. A category scale with ratio properties of intermodal and interindividual comparisons. In Psychophysical Judgment and the Process of Perception H.G. Geisser O. Petxold, eds.) pp. 25 34, VEB Deuscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin.
4. CALKIN, R.R. JELLINEK, S. 1994. Perfumery: Practice and Principles. Cap. 13, p. 152-163; Cap. 19, p. 235-242; Cap. 20, p. 249-250. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
5. CARDELLO, A., LAWLESS, H.T. SCHUTZ, H.G. 2008. Effects of extreme anchors and interior label spacing on labeled affective magnitude scales. Food Qual. Prefer. 19 (5 473 480.
6. CHAMBERS, E.V. BAKER WOLF, M. 1996. Sensory testing methods. ASTM Manual. 26, 38 53.
7. CHASTRETTE, M. 2002. Classification of odors and structure-odor relationships. In Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais A. Holley, eds). pp. 100 116, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
8. CHURCHILL, A. 2006. Measurement of fragrance perception. In The Chemistry of Fragrances from Perfumer to Consumer C.S. Sell ed.). pp. 151 157, RSC Publishing and Quest International, Ashford, Kent.
9. CIVILLE, G.V. DUS, C. 2005. How sensory evaluation can provide development direction: An approach. Cosmet. Toiletries 120 (4 49 56.
10. DALTON, P. 1996. Odor perception and Beliefs about risk. Chem. Senses. 21, 447 458.
11. DEMATTE, M.L., SANABRIA, D., SUGARMAN, R. SPENCE, C.H. 2006. Cross-modal interactions between olfaction and touch. Chem. Senses. 31 (4 291 300.
12. DEMATTÉ, M.L., OSTERBAUER, R. SPENCE, CH. 2007. Olfactory cues modulate facial attractiveness. Chem. Senses. 32, 603 610.
13. DIAMOND, J. LAWLESS, H.T. 2001. Context effects and reference standards with magnitude estimation and the labeled magnitude scale. J. Sensory Studies 16 (1 1 10.
14. DOTY, R.L., BRUGGER, W.E., JURS, P.C., ORNDOORFF, M.A., SNYDER, P.J. LOWRY, L.D. 1978. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol. Behav. 20 (2 175 185.
15. DRAKE, M.A. 2007. Invited review: Sensory analysis of dairy foods. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4925 4937.
16. ESCHER, S.D. OLIVEROS, E. 1994. A quantitative study of factors that influence the substantivity of fragrance chemicals on laundered. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 71 (1 31 40.
17. GREEN, B.G., DALTON, P., COWART, B., SHAFFER, G., RANKIN, K. HIGGINS, J. 1996. Evaluation the labeled magnitude scale for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem. Senses. 21 (3 323 334.
18. GREEN, B.G., SHAFFER, G.S. GILMORE, M.M. 1993. Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chem. Senses. 18 (6 683 702.
19. GUERRA, E.C. 2002. Propose and analyze of methodology to evaluate the performance of perfumes. 81f. [Master's degree final paper] - School of Mechanical Engineering, Campinas State University, Campinas.
20. GUEST, S., ESSIK, G., AKSHYA, P., PRAJAPATI, R. MCGLONE, F. 2007. Labeled magnitude scales for oral sensations of wetness, dryness, pleasantness and unpleasantness. Food Qual. Prefer. 18 (2 342 352.
21. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. 1994. Sensory Analysis - Methodology - Magnitude Estimation. ISO 11056.
22. KAMADIA, V.V., YOON, Y., SCHILLING, M.W. MARSHALL, D.L. 2006. Relationships between Odorant Concentration and Aroma Intensity. J. Food Sci. 71 (3 193 197.
23. KOBAL, G. HUMMEL, C. 1988. Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation on the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71 (4 241 250.
24. MACGEE, T., PURZYCKI, K.L., VEDANTAM, V.K., TAN, T.Y. CALLF, J. 2004. Malodor counteractant compositions. United States Patent Application Publication. US 2004/0248762 A1, 43p.
25. MALNIC, B. 2007. Searching for the ligands of odorant receptors. Mol. Neurobiol. 35 (2 175 181.
26. MALNIC, B. 2008. O Cheiro das Coisas. Cap 3, p. 29-41 e Cap 5, p. 51-58. Vieira & Lent, Rio de Janeiro.
27. MARKS, L.E., BORG, G. WESTERLUND, J. 1992. Differences in taste perception assessed by magnitude matching and by category-ratio scaling. Chem. Senses 17 (5 493 506.
28. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V. CARR, B.T. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. Cap. 1, p. 1-4, Cap.9, p. 144-145, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
29. MOSKOWTZ, H.R. 1977. Magnitude estimation: notes on what, how to use it. J. Food Qual. 1 (3 195 228.
30. NEUNER-JEHLE, N. ETZWEILER, F. 1994. The measuring of odors. In Perfumes: Art, Science and Technology (P.M. Müller D. Lamparsky, eds). Cap. 6, pp. 153 155. Blackie Academic & Professional, Givaudan Research Company Ltd, CH 8600 Dübendorf, Zürich, Switzerland.
31. PANGBORN, R.M. 1984. Sensory techniques of food analysis. In Food Analysis. Principles and Techniques, Physical Characterization, Vol 1 (D.W. Gruenwedel J.R. Whitaker, eds.) pp. 61 68, Marcel Dekker, New York.
32. SAITO, H., KUBOTA, M., ROBERTS, R.W., CHI, Q. MATSUNAMI, H. 2004. RTP family members induce functional expression of mammalian odorant receptors. Cell 119 (5 679 691.
33. SANTOS, M.I.N., NAKANO, A., BABY, A.R. VELASCOS, M.V.R. 2005. Análise Sensorial: ferramenta para avaliar eficácia e benefício. Cosmet. Toiletries 17 (4 52 55.
34. SCHUTZ, H.G. CARDELLO, A.V. 2001. A labeled affective magnitude (LAM) scale for assessing food liking/disliking. J. Sensory Studies 16 (2 117 159.
35. SELL, C.S. 1999. Perfumery materials of natural origin. In The Chemistry of Fragrances from Perfumer to Consumer (C.S. Sell ed.) pp. 24 25, RSC Publishing and Quest International, Ashford, Kent.
36. SHUDEL, M. QUELLET, C. 2004. Perfume Substantivity, pp. 3 4. Givaudan R&D Memorandum, Dubendorf.
37. STONE, H. SIDEL, J.L. 1992. Sensory evaluation practices. Academic Press, Orlando.
38. THE 2004 NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSIOLOGY OR MEDICINE. Odorant receptors and the organization of the olfactory system. http://nobelprize.org/nobel-prizes/ medicine/laureates/2004/press.html (accessed August 1, 2008).
39. WORTEL, V.A.L., VERBOOM, C., WIECHERS, J.W., TAELMAN, M. LEONARD, S. 2005. Liking Sensory and Rheology Characteristics. Cosmet. Toiletries 120 (4 57 66.
40. ZALIFAH, M.K., GREENWAY, D.R., CAFFIN, N.A., D'ARCY, B.R. GIDLEY, M.J. 2008. Application of labeled magnitude satiety scale in a linguistically-diverse population. Food Qual. Prefer. 19 (6 574 578.