Index of congenital minamata disease in canadian areas of concern in the great lakes: An eco-social epidemiological approach

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part C Environmental Carcinogenesis and Ecotoxicology Reviews

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 246-275

  Gilbertson, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eco social approach; Great Lakes; Minamata disease

Indexed keywords

AREAS OF CONCERNS; CEREBRAL PALSY; ECO-SOCIAL APPROACH; GREAT LAKES; GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY AGREEMENTS; HEALTH INDICES; HUMAN HEALTH; METHYL MERCURY; NATURAL SOURCES; PERSISTENT TOXIC SUBSTANCES; POLITICAL CONTEXT;

MERCURY (METAL); WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

LAKES;

LAKE WATER; MERCURY;

CANADA; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHRONOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH STATISTICS; HUMAN; LAKE; MINAMATA DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; POLITICS; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX RATIO; WATER QUALITY;

CANADA; CEREBRAL PALSY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MERCURY POISONING, NERVOUS SYSTEM; METHYLMERCURY COMPOUNDS; NERVOUS SYSTEM MALFORMATIONS; POLICY MAKING; PROBABILITY; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 71449088737     PISSN: 10590501     EISSN: 15324095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10590500903310120     Document Type: Review

References (130)

1. Gilbertson M. Epidemics in birds and mammals caused by chemicals in the Great Lakes. In: MS Evans, ed. Toxic Contaminants and Ecosystem Health: A Great Lakes Focus, New York, NY, USA: Wiley Interscience 1988: 133-152.
2. Gilbertson M. Injury to health: A forensic audit of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement with special reference to congenital Minamata disease. 2007. PhD Thesis, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland. https://dspace.stir.ac. uk/dspace/bitstream/1893/249/3/M-Gilbertson-PhD-Master-Thesis.pdf Accessed 29 October, 2008.
3. Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW, Fein GG, Schwartz PM, Dowler JK. Prenatal exposure to an environmental toxin: A test of the multiple effects model. Developmental Psychology 1984;20:523-532.
4. Jacobson SW, Fein GG, Jacobson JL, Schwartz PM, Dowler JK. The effect of intrauterine PCB exposure on visual recognition memory. Child Development 1984;56:853-860.
5. Jacobson J, Jacobson S. A 4-year follow-up study of children born to consumers of Lake Michigan fish. J Great Lakes Research 1993;19:776-783.
6. Jacobson J, Jacobson S. Intellectual impairment in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls in utero. New Engl J Med 1996;335:783-789.
7. Stewart P, Fitzgerald S, Reihman J, Brooks G, Lonky E, Darvill T, Pagano J, Hauser P. Prenatal PCB exposure, the corpus callosum, and response inhibition. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:1670-1677.
8. Stewart P, Reihman J, Lonky E, Darvill T, Pagano J. Prenatal PCB exposure and neonatal behavioural assessment scale (NBAS) performance. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 2000;22:21-29.
9. Stewart PW, Lonky E, Reihman J, Pagano J, Gump BB, Darvill T. The relationship between prenatal PCB exposure and intelligence (IQ) in 9-Year-Old Children. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:1416-1422.
10. Adkin L. Politics of Sustainable Development; Citizens, Unions and the Corporations, Montreal: Black Rose Books, 1998.
11. International Joint Commission. Pollution of Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. Ottawa: Information Canada, 1970.
12. Fimreite N. Mercury uses in Canada and their possible hazards as sources of mercury contamination. Environ Pollution 1970;1:119-131.
13. Jensen S, Jernelov A. Biological methylation of mercury in biological organisms. Nature 1969;223:753-754.
14. Fimreite N. Mercury contamination of Canadian fish and fish-eating birds. Background papers for the Great Lakes Environmental Conference. Toronto, Ontario, September 1970.
15. Kurland LT, Faro SM, Siedeler H. Minamata disease. World Neurology 1960;1: 323-333.
16. Takeuchi T. Pathology of Minamata disease. In Minamata Disease Study Group of Minamata Disease. Japan: Kumamoto University Press, 1968:178-194.
17. Botts L, Muldoon PR. Evolution of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 2005.
18. Gilbertson M, Morris RD. Hunter RA. Abnormal chicks and PCB residue levels in eggs of colonial birds on the lower Great Lakes (1971-1973). Auk 1976;93:434-442.
19. Humphrey HEB. Evaluation of changes of the levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in human tissue. 1976; Final Report on US FDA contract. Lansing: Michigan Department of Health.
20. Jervis RE, Debrun D, LePage W, Tiefenbach B. Mercury residues in Canadian foods, fish, wildlife 1970. Summary of Progress: National Health Grant Project No 605- 7-510 Trace Mercury in Environmental Materials. University of Toronto: Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry.
21. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int. J. Epidemiology 1985;14:32-38.
22. Krieger N. Epidemiology and the web of causation: Has anyone seen the spider? Social Sci Med. 1994;39:887-903.
23. Susser M, Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology: I. Eras and paradigms. Am J Public Health 1996;86:668-673.
24. Susser M, Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology: II From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. Am J Public Health 1996;86:674-677.
25. Pearce N. Traditional epidemiology, modern epidemiology, and public health. Am J Public Health 1996;86:678-683.
26. Pekkanen J, Pearce N. Environmental epidemiology: Challenges and opportunities. Environ. Health Perspect 2001;109:1-5.
27. Susser M. Rules of inference in epidemiology. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1986;6:116-128.
28. Susser M. The logic of Sir Karl Popper and the practice of epidemiology. Am J Epidemiology 1986;124:711-718.
29. Susser M. What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. Am J Epidemiology 1991;133:635-648.
30. Cyranoski D. Disputed diagnoses hamper claims of mercury poisoning. Nature 2001;414:138.
31. Yazawa Y. Outline of the environmental restoration of Minamata Bay polluted with mercury (clean-up operation of bottom sediments accumulated in Minamata Bay). Abstract for 6th International Conference onMercury as a Global Pollutant.Minamata, Japan. October 15-19, 2001.
32. Trip L, Thorleifson M. The CanadianMercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Industry:Mercury Emissions and Status of Facilities, 1935-1996. Report to Transboundary Air Issues Branch. Hull, Quebec, Canada: Environment Canada, 1998.
33. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, United Kingdom: Sage, 1992.
34. Brown P. Toxic Exposures: Contested Illnesses and the Environmental Health Movement. NY: Columbia University Press, 2007.
35. Health Canada. Methyl mercury in Canada: Exposure of First Nations and Inuit residents to methyl mercury in the Canadian environment. Ottawa: Health Canada, 1999.
36. Henshel D, Aschner M, Basu N, Bowerman W, Echeverria D, Gilbertson M, Ralston N, Rumbold D, Wolfe M. New bioindicators for mercury toxicological assessment: Recommendations from the First International Bioindicators Roundtable. Environmental Bioindicators 2007;2:183-207.
37. Health Canada. Health data and statistics for the population of the region (1986-1992). 1998; Great Lakes Health Effects Programme A Technical Report for the Remedial Action Plan Community. http://groups.google.ca/group/ Friends-of- AGG/topics?hl=en&start=490&sa=N Accessed October 29, 2008.
38. Gilbertson M, Brophy J. Community health profile of Windsor, Ontario, Canada: Anatomy of a Great Lakes Area of Concern. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;106(Suppl 6):827-843.
39. Harada M. CongenitalMinamata disease: Intrauterine methyl mercury poisoning. Teratology 1978;18:285-288
40. Marsh DO, Myers GJ, Clarkson TW, et al. Fetal methyl mercury poisoning: New data on clinical and toxicological aspects. Trans Am Neurological Assoc 1987;102: 69-71.
41. Choi BH. The effects of methyl mercury on the developing brain. Progress in Neurobiology 1989;32:447-470.
42. World Health Organization. International Programme for Chemical Safety. Environmental Health Criteria 101: Methyl mercury. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990.
43. Gilbertson M. Male cerebral palsy hospitalisation as a potential indicator of neurological effects of methyl mercury exposure in Great Lakes communities. Environ Res. 2004;95:375-384.
44. Thomas R. The distribution and transport of mercury in the sediments of the Laurentian Great Lakes system. Proceedings of an International Conference on the Transport of Persistent Chemicals in Aquatic Ecosystems. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada I-1-I-16, 1974.
45. Marvin C, Painter S, Rossman R. Spatial and temporal patterns in mercury contamination in sediments of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environ Res 2004;95:351-362. (Pubitemid 38833587)
46. Graham JD. The risk not reduced. NYU Environ Law J 1995;3:382-404.
47. United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Smoking and Health. Washington, DC: Public Health Service Publication No 1103, 1964.
48. Hill AB. The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proc Royal Soc Med 1965;58:295-300.
49. Fox GA. Practical causal inference for ecoepidemiologists. J Toxicol Environ Health 1991;33(4):359-373.
50. Susser M. Causal thinking in the health sciences: Concepts and strategies in epidemiology, NY: Oxford University Press, 1973.
51. McKeown-Eyssen GE, Ruedy J, Neims A. Methyl mercury exposure in Northern Quebec. II. Neurologic findings in children. Am J Epidemiology 1983;118:470-479.
52. HaradaM. CongenitalMinamata disease: Intrauterine methylmercury poisoning. In Seki T, ed. Brain Damage Associated with Prenatal Environmental Factors 1994: 61-66.
53. Marsh DO, Myers GJ, Clarkson RW, Amin-Zaki L, Al-Tikriti, S. Fetal methyl mercury poisoning: Relationship between concentration in single strands of maternal hair and child effects. Arch Neurology 1987;44:1017-1022.
54. Cordier S, Garel M, Mandereau L, Morcel H, Doineau P, Gosme-Segure S, Josse D, White R, Amiel-Tison C. Neurodevelopmental investigations among methyl mercuryexposed children in French Guiana. Environ Res 2002;89:1-11.
55. Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F. Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to 'safe' levels of methyl mercury. Environ Res 1998;A77:165-172.
56. Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Marsh DO, Tanner MA, Berlin M, Sloan-Reeves J, Cernichiari E, Choisy A, Choi A, Clarkson TW. Longitudinal neurodevelopmental study of Seychellois children following in utero exposure to methyl mercury from maternal fish ingestion: outcomes at 19 and 29 months. Neurotoxicology 1995;16:677-688. (Pubitemid 26062237)
57. Harada M. Minamata disease: Methyl mercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol 1995;25:1-24.
58. Rossi AD, Ahlbom E, Ogren SO, Nicotera P, Ceccatelli S. Prenatal exposure to methyl mercury alters locomotor activity of male but not female rats. Exp Brain Res 1997;17:428-436
59. Gimenez-Llort L, Ahlbom E, Dare E, Vahter M, Ogren S, Ceccatelli S. Prenatal exposure to methyl mercury changes dopamine-modulated motor activity during early ontogeny: Age and gender-dependent effects. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2001;9(3): 61-70.
60. Sager PR, Aschner M, Rodier PM. Persistent differential alterations in developing cerebella cortex of male and female mice after methyl mercury exposure. Develop Brain Res 1984;12:1-11.
61. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury Study Report to Congress. EPA-452/R-97-1003 Washington, DC, 1997.
62. National Research Council. Toxicological Effects of Methyl Mercury. Washington, DC: Committee on the Toxicological Effects of Methyl mercury, National Academy Press, 2000.
63. Wiener JG, Krabbenhoft DP, Heinz GH, Scheuhammer AM. Ecotoxicology of mercury. In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA, Cairns J, eds, Handbook of Ecotoxicology. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2002.
64. Gilbertson M, Carpenter DO. An ecosystem approach to the health effects of mercury in the Great Lakes basin. Environ Res 2004;95:240-246.
65. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Mercury (Update). Atlanta: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
66. Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA, Clarkson TW, Doherty RA, Greenwood M. Intra-uterine methyl mercury poisoning in Iraq. Paediatrics 1974;54(5):587-595.
67. Murakami U. The effect of organic mercury on intrauterine life. Adv Exp Med Biol 1972;27:301.
68. Harada M. Minamata disease: A medical report. In Smith WE, Smith AM, eds, Minamata NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1975: 180-191.
69. Choi CM, Lapham LW, Amin-Zaki L, et al. Abnormal neuronal migration, deranged cerebral cortical organization and diffuse white matter astrocytosis of human foetal brain: A major effect of methyl mercury poisoning in utero. J Neuropathol Exp Neurology 1978;37:719-732.
70. Matsumoto H, Koya G, Takeuchi T. Fetal Minamata disease-a neuro-pathological study of two cases on intrauterine intoxication by a methyl mercury compound. J Neuropathol Exp,. Neurology 1965;24:563-574.
71. Sager PR, Doherty RA, Rodier, PM. Effects of methyl mercury on developing mouse cerebella cortex. Exp Neurology 1982;77:179-183.
72. Vogel DG, Margolis RL, Mottet NK. The effects of methyl mercury binding to microtubules. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol.1985;80:473-486
73. Weis M. Mercury concentrations in fish from Canadian Great Lakes areas of concern: An analysis of data from the Department of Environment database. Environ Res. 2004;95:341-350.
74. Mandelbaum D, Paneth N. Cerebral palsy continuum. Lifelong Learning in Neurology 2000;6:8-30.
75. American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the American Academy of Paediatrics. Neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy: Defining the pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003.
76. Statistics Canada. Profile of Census Divisions and Subdivisions in Ontario: Part A: 1991 Census of Canada. Ottawa: Supply and Services, 1992.
77. United States Senate. The Effects of Mercury on Man and the Environment. Subcommittee on Energy, Natural Resources, and the Environment of the Committee on Commerce: Part 1 and Part 2: Serial No 91-173 Washington, DC, 1970.
78. Bowerman WW. Bald eagles as indicators of ecosystem health in the Great Lakes. Paper presented at 28th Annual Meeting of the North American Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Abstract No 571, 2007.
79. Ludwig JP. Caspian tern and cormorant population dynamics and the evidence for sink/source: Associations with TCDD-EQ embryo and post-hatch exposures. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Abstract No 568, 2007.
80. Norstrom RJ, Simon M, Moisey J, Wakeford B, Weseloh DVC. Geographical distribution (2000) and temporal trends (1981-2000) of brominated diphenyl ethers in Great Lakes herring gull eggs. Environ Sci Technol 2002;36:4783-4789.
81. Great Lakes Water Quality Board. Legislative and regulatory considerations for virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances.Windsor, Canada: International Joint Commission, 1992.
82. Goffman E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. NY: Harper & Row, 1974.
83. Commoner B. The Closing Circle: Nature, Man and Technology. NY: Knopf, 1971.
84. Carson R. Silent Spring. NY: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
85. Crozier M, Huntington S, et al. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. NY: New York University Press, 1975.
86. Chomsky N. Language and Politics. NY: Black Rose, 1988.
87. Stone DA. Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly 1989;104:281-300.
88. Clark D. Neoliberalism and public service reform: Canada in comparative perspective. Can J Political Sci. 2002;35:771-793.
89. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. NY: Oxford University Press, 2005.
90. Prasad M. The Politics of Free Markets: The Rise of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
91. Snider L. Captured by neo-liberalism: Regulation and risk in Walkerton, Ontario. Risk Management: An International Journal 2003;5:27-36.
92. Snider L. Resisting neo-liberalism: The poisoned water disaster in Walkerton, Ontario. Social and Legal Studies 2004;13:265-289.
93. Great Lakes Water Quality Board. Risk assessment, communication and management in the Great Lakes Basin. Windsor, Ontario, Canada: International Joint Commission, 1993.
94. Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk: Assessing 15 years of research and theory. In Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P, eds, The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 13-46.
95. Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P, eds. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press., 2003
96. Egilman DS, Bohme SR. Over a barrel: Corporate corruption of science and its effects on workers and the environment. Int J Occup Environ Health 2005;11:331-337.
97. Freudenburg WR. Institutional failure and the organisational amplification of risks: The need for a closer look. In Pidgeon, N Kasperson, RE, Slovic, P, eds, The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 102-120.
98. Jay M. The Virtues of Mendacity: On Lying in Politics. 2008; http://www.iue.it/ MaxWeberProgramme/PDFs/JayTheVirtues.pdf Accessed November 4, 2008.
99. Colborn T. Great Lakes, Great Legacy?Washington, DC and Ottawa, Canada: Conservation Foundation and Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1990.
100. International Joint Commission. 1989 Report of the Great Lakes Science Advisory Board to the International Joint Commission. Windsor, Ontario: International Joint Commission, 1989.
101. Gilbertson M, Schneider RS. International Joint Commission Workshop on Cause-Effect Linkages: Preface. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 1991;33(4):v-x.
102. Durnil GK. The Making of a Conservative Environmentalist. Bloomington, IA: Indiana University Press, 1995.
103. International Joint Commission. Fifth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Part II.Washington, DC and Ottawa, Canada: International Joint Commission, 1990.
104. International Joint Commission. Sixth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Washington, DC and Ottawa Canada: International Joint Commission, 1992.
105. De Rosa C, Gilman AP, Rosemond ZA, eds, Proceedings of Health Conference '97-Great Lakes/St Lawrence. Environ Res. 1999;A80:S1-S248.
106. International Joint Commission. Tenth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Washington, DC and Ottawa, Canada: International Joint Commission, 2000.
107. International Joint Commission. Twelfth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Washington, DC and Ottawa, Canada: International Joint Commission, 2004.
108. Gilbertson M, Watterson AE. Diversionary reframing of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Journal of Public Health Policy 2007;28:201-215.
109. Vallentyne JR. Extending causality in the Great Lakes basin ecosystem. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 1999;2:229-237.
110. Hartig JH, Zarull MA. Under RAPs: Toward Grassroots Ecological Democracy in the Great Lakes Basin. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1992.
111. Westra L. An Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.
112. Regier HA, Cowell HA. Application of ecosystem theory: Succession, diversity, stability, stress and conservation. Biological Conservation 1972;4:83-88.
113. Chalmers AF. What is This Thing Called Science? 2nd ed. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, 1982.
114. Selye H. Stress without Distress. Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: New American Library of Canada, 1975.
115. Rapport DJ, Regier HA, Hutchinson TC. Ecosystem behaviour under stress. American Naturalist 1985;125(5):617-640.
116. National Research Council of the United States and The Royal Society of Canada. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: An Evolving Instrument for Ecosystem Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.
117. Krantzberg G. The ongoing review of the Great Lakes water quality agreement. J Great Lakes Res 2007;33:699-703.
118. Cook PM, Robbins JA, Endicott DD, Lodge KB, Guiney PD, Walker MK, Zabel EW, Peterson RE. Effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated early life stage toxicity on lake trout populations in Lake Ontario during the 20th century. Environ Sci Technol 2003;37(17):3864-3877.
119. Wynne B. Establishing the rules of laws: Constructing expert authority. In Smith R. Wynne B, eds, Expert Evidence: Interpreting Science in the Law. London, UK: Routledge, 1989.
120. Longo J, Hodge RA. The ecosystem dilemma: Discordance between nature and culture. Horizons 2007;9(3). http://www.whitehallpolicy.ca/Horizons V9N3 Longo and Hodge.pdf Accessed October 28, 2008.
121. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Great Lakes Pollution Prevention and Toxics Reduction: Strategic Outcomes and Ecosystem Goals: Lake Superior. 2007; http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakesuperior/draftecosystemgoals121207. pdf. Accessed: October 29, 2008.
122. Council of Great Lakes Industries. Building a Sustainable Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. 2007; http://www.cgli.org/sustainable/WQAConfWorkshop FinalReport3-07.pdf. Accessed 29 October, 2008.
123. Canada- United States Binational Executive Committee. Review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: Final Report to the Binational Executive Committee. 2007; http://binational.net/glwqa/v1 glwqareview en.pdf. Accessed 29 October, 2008.
124. International Joint Commission. Advice to Governments on their Review of the Great LakesWater Quality Agreement: A Special Report to the Governments of Canada and the United States. 2006; http://www.ijc.org/php/publications/pdf/ ID1603.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2008.
125. Hayek FA. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2007.
126. Gramsci A. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London, UK: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971.
127. Krantzberg G, Manno J, de Boer C. Great Lakes St Lawrence River Governance: Report on the Expert Workshop. Toronto: Joyce Foundation/ McMaster University, 2007.
128. Jackson J, Sloan KK. Strengthening Decision-making and Accountability under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Buffalo: Great Lakes United, 2008.
129. Natural Resources Defense Council. The Bush Record. 2005; http://www. nrdc.org/. Accessed October 29, 2008.
130. Clinton HR Remarks at the 100th Anniversary of the Boundary Waters Treaty. 2009; http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/06/124716.htm. Accessed July 30, 2009.