Diversionary reframing of the great lakes water quality agreement

Journal of Public Health Policy

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 201-215

  Gilbertson, Michael ^a,b   Watterson, Andrew E ^a  

^a Stirling University ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Injury to health; Neo liberal; Neuro development; Policy analysis; Restoration

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER;

ARTICLE; CANADA; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGAL ASPECT; POLICY; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; WATER POLLUTION; WATER SUPPLY;

CANADA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; WATER POLLUTION; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 34250889333     PISSN: 01975897     EISSN: 1745655X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200134     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. International Joint Commission. Pollution of Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. Ottawa: Information Canada; 1970.
2. International Joint Commission. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Review: Web Dialogue. Available at http://www.ijc.org/en/ activities/consultations/glwqa/index.php, accessed 11 December 2005.
3. International Joint Commission. Advice to Governments on their Review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: A Special Report to the Governments of Canada and the United States. Washington, Ottawa & Windsor: International Joint Commission; 2006.
4. Pekkanen J, Pearce N. Environmental epidemiology: challenges and opportunities. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:1-5.
5. United States Environmental Protection Agency. GLWQA Review. Available at http://akron.glnpo.net/glwqa, accessed 4 October 2006.
6. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage: London; 1992.
7. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan. 2000. Available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakemich/ lmlamp2000/LM%2oappendix%2oc.pdf, accessed 20 September 2006.
8. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Lake Erie Lakewide Management Plan. Available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/lakeerie/2006update/ Section_8.pdf, accessed 20 September 2006.
9. International Joint Commission. Priorities 2003-2005: Priorities and Progress Under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Available at http://www.canamglass.org/glwqa/files/prioritiesfullreport.pdf, accessed 20 September 2006.
10. Gilbertson M, Fox GA, Bowerman WW. Trends in Levels and Effects of Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes. The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1998.
11. Fox GA. Practical causal inference for ecoepidemiologists. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991533:359-73.
12. Cook PM, Robbins JA, Endicott DD, Lodge KB, Guiney PD, Walker MK, et al. Effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated early life stage toxicity on lake trout populations in Lake Ontario during the 2oth century. Environ Sei Technol. 2003;37:3864-77.
13. Regier HA, Cowell HA. Application of ecosystem theory: succession, diversity, stability, stress and conservation. Biol Conserv. 1972;4:83-8.
14. Botts L, Muldoon PR. Evolution of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press; 2005.
15. National Research Council of the United States and The Royal Society of Canada. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: An Evolving Instrument for Ecosystem Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985.
16. Caldwell KL. Perspectives on Ecosystem Management for the Great Lakes: A Reader. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1988.
17. International Joint Commission. Twelfth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Washington, Ottawa & Windsor: International Joint Commission; 2004.
18. Freudenburg WR. Institutional failure and the organisational amplification of risks: the need for a closer look In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P, editors. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003, p. 102-20.
19. Environment Canada and United States Environmental Protection Agency. Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy,. Progress Report, Table 6.1. Available at http://binational.net/bns/2005/2005-GLBTS-English-web.pdf, accessed 25 September 2006.
20. Great Lakes Regional Collaboration. Strategy to Restore and Protect the Great Lakes. Available at http://www.glrc.us/strategy.html, accessed 25 September 2006.
21. International Joint Commission. Tenth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Washington, Ottawa & Windsor: International Joint Commission; 2000.
22. Adkin L. Politics of Sustainable Development; Citizens, Unions and the Corporations. Montreal: Black Rose Books; 1998.
23. Habermas J. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press; 1970.
24. International Joint Commission. Fifth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Part II. Washington, Ottawa & Windsor: International Joint Commission; 1990.
25. International Joint Commission. Sixth Biennial Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Washington, Ottawa & Windsor: International Joint Commission; 1992.
26. Durnil GK. The Making of a Conservative Environmentalist. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1995.
27. Johnson BL, De Rosa CT. Conclusions: public health implications. Environ Res. 1999;80(Section A):S246-8.
28. Johnson BL, Hicks HE, De Rosa CT. Introduction: key environmental human health issues in the Great Lakes and St Lawrence River basins. Environ Res. 1999;80(Section A):S1-12.
29. Saul JR. The Collapse of Globalism: and the Reinvention of the World. Toronto: Viking Canada; 2005.
30. Doonahue MJ. The case for good government: why a comprehensive review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement is needed. Toledo J Great Lakes Law Sci Policy. 1999;1:1-11.
31. Council of Great Lakes Industries. Position of the Council of Great Lakes Industries on the Remedial Action Plan Process. Available at http://www.cgli.org/rap.html, accessed 21 November 2003.
32. Barlow M. Too Close for Comfort. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart; 2005.
33. Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Chesapeake 2000: The Renewed Bay Agreement. Available at http://dnrweb.dnr.state.md.us/bay/res_protect/ c2k/history.asp, accessed 4 October 2006.
34. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Everglades Restoration. Available at http://www.dep.state.fl.us/secretary/everglades/, accessed 4 October 2006.