GroupTime: Preference-based group scheduling

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1047-1056

  Brzozowski, Mike ^a   Carattini, Kendra ^a   Klemmer, Scott R ^a   Mihelich, Patrick ^a   Hu, Jiang ^a   Ng, Andrew Y ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Group calendaring; Group scheduling; Intelligent user interfaces; Machine learning; Supervised learning

Indexed keywords

GROUP CALENDARING; GROUP SCHEDULING; INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL ASPECTS; USER INTERFACES;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 33745872249     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. AOL Instant Messenger, 2005. America Online, Inc.: Dulles, VA. www.aim.com
2. iCal, 2005. Apple Computer, Inc.: Cupertino, CA. www.apple.com/macosx/features/ical/
3. Lotus Notes, 2005. IBM Corporation: Armonk, NY. www.ibm.com/software/lotus/
4. MSN Messenger, 2005. Microsoft Corp.: Redmond, WA. messenger.msn.com/
5. Outlook, 2003. Microsoft Corp.: Redmond, WA. office.microsoft.com
6. Palm Desktop, 2004. PalmSource, Inc.: Sunnyvale, CA. www.palmos.com/dev/tools/desktop/
7. Beard, D., M. Palaniappan, A. Humm, et al. A visual calendar for scheduling group meetings. Proc. of CSCW 1990: ACM Press, pp. 279-90, 1990.
8. Boser, B. E., I. M. Guyon, and V. N. Vapnik. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proc. Workshop on Computational Learning Theory: ACM Press, pp. 144-52, 1992.
9. Dourish, P., Social Computing, in Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. pp. 55-98, 2001.
10. Dourish, P. and S. Bly. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Proc. CHI 1992: ACM Press, pp. 541-47, 1992.
11. Evite, www.evite.com. 2005.
12. Fogarty, J., S. E. Hudson, and J. Lai. Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. Proc. CHI 2004: ACM Press, pp. 207-14
13. Friedman, N., D. Geiger, and M. Goldszmidt. Bayesian Network Classifiers. Machine Learning 29(2-3). pp. 131-63, 1997.
14. Gajos, K. and D. S. Weld. SUPPLE: automatically generating user interfaces. Proc. IUI 2004: ACM Press, pp. 93-100, 2004.
15. Gervasio, M. T., M. D. Moffitt, M. E. Pollack, et al. Active preference learning for personalized calendar scheduling assistance. In Proc. IUI 2005: ACM Press, pp. 90-97, 2005.
16. Grudin, J. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of'the ACM 37(1), 1994.
17. Higa, K., B. Shin, and V. Sivakumar. Meeting Scheduling: An Experimental Investigation. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man., and Cybernetics, 1996.
18. Horvitz, E., P. Koch, C. M. Kadie, and A. Jacobs. Coordinate: Probabilistic Forecasting of Presence and Availability. In Proc. Conf. on Uncertainty and AI: Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
19. Hu, J. and M. Brzozowski. Preference-Based Group Scheduling. In Proc. Interact 2005, 2005.
20. Hutchins, E., Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1995.
21. Isbell, C. L. and J. S. Pierce. An IP Continuum for Adaptive Interface Design. In Proc. HCI International, 2005.
22. Kushmerick, N. and T. Lau, Automated email activity management: an unsupervised learning approach, in IUI 2005, 2005, ACM Press: San Diego, CA.
23. Lamming, M., P. Brown, K. Carter, et al. The Design of a Human Memory Prosthesis. The Computer Journal 37(3). pp. 153-63, 1994.
24. Maes, P. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Commun. ACM 37(7). pp. 30-40, 1994.
25. McCullagh, P. and J. A. Neider, Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall 1989.
26. Palen, L., Calendars on the New Frontier: Challenges of Groupware Technology, University of California, Irvine, 1998.
27. Palen, L. Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems. Proc. CHI 1999: ACM Press, pp. 17-24, 1999.
28. Rocco, E., Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact, in CHI 1998. 1998, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
29. Schmandt, C., N. Marmasse, S. Marti, et al. Everywhere messaging. IBM Syst. J. 39(3-4). pp. 660-77, 2000.
30. Searle, J., Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press 1969.
31. Sen, S., T. Haynes, and N. Arora. Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies 47(3). pp. 407-27, 1997.
32. Shneiderman, B. and P. Maes. Direct manipulation vs. interface agents, interactions 4(6). pp. 42-61, 1997.
33. Suchman, L. Speech acts and voices: response to Winograd et al. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 3(1). pp. 85-95, 199:5.
34. Suchman, L. A., Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication: Cambridge University Press. 203 1987.
35. Thrift, N., The Making of a Capitalist Time Consciousness, in The Sociology of Time, J. Hassard, Editor. St. Martin's Press: New York, 1990.
36. Tullio, J. Intelligent groupware to support communication and persona management Proc. VIST 2003, 2003.
37. Winograd, T. A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. HCI 3(1). pp. 3-30, 1988.