Male sexual signals and female choice in Drosophila grimshawi (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

Journal of Insect Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 59-71

  Droney, David C ^a   Benjamin Hock, M ^a,b  

^a HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Female choice; Hawaiian Drosophila; Leks; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA GRIMSHAWI;

EID: 7144264426     PISSN: 08927553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020866500228     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andersson, M. B. (1986). Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: Sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804-816.
2. Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Bateson, P. P. G. (ed.). (1983). Mate Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Becker, W. A. (1984). A Manual of Quantitative Genetics, Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA.
5. Carson, H. L., Hardy, D. E., Spieth, H. T., and Stone, W. S. (1970). The evolutionary biology of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. In Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C., (eds.), Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 457-543.
6. Chatterjee, S., and Price, B. (1977). Regression Analysis by Example, New York University Press, New York.
7. Droney, D. C. (1992). Sexual selection in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila: The roles of male competition and female choice in male mating success. Anim. Behav. 44: 1007-1020.
8. Droney, D. C. (1994). Tests of hypotheses for lek formation in a Hawaiian Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 47: 351-361.
9. Droney, D. C. (1996). Environmental influences on male courtship and its implications for female choice in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 51: 821-830.
10. Ewing, L. S., and Ewing, A. W. (1984). Courtship in Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour of mixed-sex groups in large observation chambers. Behaviour 90: 184-202.
11. Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd ed., Longman, New York.
12. Flury, B., and Riedwyl, H. (1993). Multivariate Statistics: A Practical Approach, Chapman and Hall, London.
13. Halliday, T. R. (1983). The study of mate choice. In Bateson, P. P. G. (ed.), Mate Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Hodosh, R., Ringo, J. M., and McAndrew, F. T. (1979). Density and lek displays in D. grimshawi (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 49: 164-172.
15. Höglund, J., and Alatalo, R. V. (1995). Leks, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Johnstone, R. A. (1995). Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: Reviewing the evidence. Biol. Rev. 70: 1-65.
17. Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M. J. (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature Lond. 350: 33-38.
18. Lessells, C. M., and Boag, P. T. (1987). Unrepeatable repeatabilities: A common mistake. Auk 104: 116-121.
19. Møller, A. P., and Pomiankowski, A. (1993). Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 167-176.
20. Ohta, A. T. (1978). Ethological isolation and phytogeny in the grimshawi species complex of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 32: 485-492.
21. Reynolds, J. D., and Gross, M. R. (1990). Costs and benefits of female mate choice: Is there a lek paradox? Am. Nat. 136: 230-243.
22. Spieth, H. T. (1984). Courtship Behaviours of the Hawaiian Picture-Winged Drosophila, University of California Publications in Entomology, Vol. 103.
23. Spieth, H. T. (1986). Behavioural characteristics of Hawaiian Drosophila. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 26: 101-108.
24. Wiley, R. H., and Poston, J. (1996). Perspective: Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50: 1371-1381.
25. Wilkinson, L. (1992). SYSTAT: The System for Statistics, SYSTAT, Evanston, IL.
26. Yoon, J. S. (1985). Drosophilidae II: Drosophila species other than D. melanogaster. In Singh, P., and Moore, R. F. (eds.), Handbook of Insect Rearing, Vol. II, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 85-91.