Environmental influences on male courtship and implications for female choice in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 821-830

  Droney, David C ^a  

^a HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURTSHIP; LEKKING; MATE CHOICE;

DIPTERA; DROSPHILA GRIMSHAWI;

EID: 0029769554     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0086     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution, 40, 804-816.
2. Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Archs néerl. Zool., 14, 200-281.
3. Barker, J. S. F., Starmer, W. T. & Vacek, D. C. 1987. Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in the community structure of yeasts associated with decaying Opuntia cactus. Microb. Ecol., 14, 267-276.
4. Bateson, P. P. G. (Ed.). 1983. Mate Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bradbury, J. W. & Andersson, M. B. (Eds) 1987. Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. Chichester: John Wiley.
6. Carson, H. L. & Ohta, A. T. 1981. Origin of the genetic basis of colonizing ability. In: Evolution Today. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Systematics and Evolutionary Biology (Ed. by G. G. E. Scudder & J. L. Reveal), pp. 365-370. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.
7. Carson, H. L., Hardy, D. E., Spieth, H. T. & Stone, W. S. 1970. The evolutionary biology of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. In: Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky (Ed. by M. K. Hecht & W. C. Steere), pp. 437-543. New York: Appleton Century-Crofts.
8. Cobb, M., Burnet, B. & Connolly, K. 1986. The structure of courtship in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Behaviour, 97, 182-212.
9. Coyne, J. A., Crittenden, A. P. & Mah, K. 1994. Genetics of pheromone difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science, 265, 1461-1464.
10. Droney, D. C. 1992. Sexual selection in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila. the roles of male competition and female choice in male mating success. Anim. Behav., 44, 1007-1020.
11. Droney, D. C. 1994. Tests of hypotheses for lek formation in a Hawaiian Drosophila. Anim. Behav., 47, 351-361.
12. Ewing, L. S. & Ewing, A. W. 1984. Courtship in Drosophila melanogaster. behaviour of mixed-sex groups in large observation chambers. Behaviour, 90, 184-202.
13. Flury, B. & Riedwyl, H. 1993. Multivariate Statistics: A Practical Approach. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps, J. theor. Biol., 144, 517-546.
15. Hodosh, R., Ringo, J. M. & McAndrew, F. T. 1979. Density and lek displays in D. grimshawi (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Z. Tierpsychol., 49, 164-172.
16. Hoikkala, A. & Liimatainen, J. 1992. Competitive mating success and attractiveness of sterile and fertile males of Drosophila montana. Ethology, 91, 122-133.
17. Kambysellis, M. & Heed, W. B. 1971. Studies of oogenesis in natural populations of Drosophilidae. I. Relation to ovarian development and ecological habitats of the Hawaiian species. Am. Nat., 105, 31-49.
18. Kaneshiro, K. Y. & Boake, C. R. B. 1987. Sexual selection and speciation: issues raised by Hawaiian Drosophila. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2, 207-212.
19. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, Lond., 350, 3338.
20. Knapp, R. A. & Kovach, J. T. 1991. Courtship as an honest indicator of male parental quality in the bicolor damselfish, Stegastespartitus. Behav. Ecol., 2, 295-300.
21. Krainacker, D. A., Carey, J. R. & Vargas, R. I. 1987. Effect of larval host on life history traits of the mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Oecologia (Berl.), 73, 583-590.
22. Markow, T. A. & Toolson, E. C. 1990. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. In: Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics (Ed. by J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer & R. J. Maclntyre), pp. 315-331. New York: Plenum Press.
23. Montgomery, S. L. 1975. Comparative breeding site ecology and the adaptive radiation of picture-winged Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Hawaii. Proc. Hawaii. entomol. Soc., 22, 65-103.
24. Ohta, A. T. 1978. Ethological isolation and phylogeny in the grimshawi species complex of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution, 32, 485-492.
25. Ohta, A. T. 1989. Coadaptive changes in speciation via the founder principle in the grimshawi complex of Hawaiian Drosophila. In: Genetics, Speciation, and the Founder Principle (Ed. by L. V. Giddings, K. Y. Kaneshiro & W. W. Anderson), pp. 315-328. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Price, T., Schluter, D. & Heckman, N. E. 1993. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Blol. J. Linn. Soc., 48, 187-211.
27. Reynolds, J. D. & Gross, M. R. 1990. Costs and benefits of female choice: is there a lek paradox? Am. Nat., 136, 230-243.
28. Reynolds, J. D. & Gross, M. R. 1992. Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 250, 57-62.
29. Ringo, J. M. & Hodosh, R. J. 1978. A multivariate analysis of behavioral divergence among closely related species of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution, 32, 389-397.
30. Ringo, J. M. & Pratt, N. R. 1978. A juvenile hormone induces precocious sexual behavior in Drosophila grimshawi. Ann. entomol. Soc. Am., 71, 264-266.
31. Robertson, F. W., Shook, M., Takei, G. & Gaines, H. 1968. Observations on the biology and nutrition of Drosophila disticha (Hardy), an indigeneous Hawaiian species. Univ. Tex. Pubis, 6818, 279-299.
32. Scott, D. 1994. Genetic variation for female mate discrimination in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 48, 112-121.
33. Spieth, H. T. 1984. Courtship behaviors of the Hawaiian picture-winged Drosophila. Univ. Calif. Publs Entomol., 103, 1-92.
34. Spieth, H. T. 1986. Behavioral characteristics of Hawaiian Drosophila. Proc. Hawaii. entomol. Soc., 26, 101-108.
35. Starmer, W. T. & Wolf, L. W. 1989. Causes of variation in wing loading among Drosophila species. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 37, 247-261.
36. Vehrencamp, S. L., Bradbury, J. W. & Gibson, R. M. 1989. The energetic cost of display in male sage grouse. Anim. Behav., 38, 885-896.
37. Wilkinson, L. 1992. SYSTAT: Statistics. Version 5.2. Evanston, Illinois: Systat.
38. Yoon, J. S. 1985. Drosophilidae II: Drosophila species other than D. melanogaster. In: Handbook of Insect Rearing, Vol. II (Ed. by P. Singh & R. F. Moore), pp. 85-91. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
39. Zuk, M. 1991. Sexual ornaments as animal signals. Trends Ecol. Evol., 6, 228-231.