Prediction of heavy metal concentrations in urban stormwater

Water and Environment Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 247-254

  May, Daniel B ^a   Sivakumar, Muttucumaru ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Catchment management; Diffuse pollution; Modelling; Storm; Urban; Water quality

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT; CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS; DIFFUSE POLLUTION; EVENT MEAN CONCENTRATIONS; HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION; METROPOLITAN AREA; REGRESSION MODEL; STATISTICAL MODELS; STORMWATERS; SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT; URBAN RUNOFF; URBAN STORMWATER; URBAN STORMWATER RUNOFF; URBAN WATERS;

CATCHMENTS; LEAD; METALS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RUNOFF; SEWAGE; STORMS; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; ZINC;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

COPPER; HEAVY METAL; LEAD; RAIN; STORM WATER; ZINC;

CATCHMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); COPPER; LEAD; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RUNOFF; STORMWATER; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; ZINC;

ACCURACY; ACID RAIN; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER POLLUTANT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 71249124919     PISSN: 17476585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2008.00138.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Athayde DN, Shelley PE, Driscoll ED, Gaboury D, Boyd G. Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program 1983, Vol. 1. U S Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
2. Brezonik PL, Stadelmann TH. Analysis and Predictive Models of Stormwater Runoff Volumes, Loads and Pollutant Concentrations from Watersheds in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota, USA. Water Res. 2002, 36:1743-1757.
3. 1998, http://www.eng.ua.edu/~awra/download.htm, Cahaba/Warrier Student Chapter of the American Water Resources Association., NURP data, University of Alabama [online]., [accessed 16 March 2001]
4. Driver N, Tasker G. 1990, , United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2363, Washington
5. Duncan HP. 1999, , Report 99/3, CRC for Catchment Hydrology, Victoria
6. Hill AR. Stream Nitrate-N Loads in Relation to Variations in Annual and Seasonal Runoff Regimes. Water Resour. Bull. 1986, 22((5)):829-839.
7. Loke E, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, Harremoes P, Joliffe IB, Ball JE. Artificial Neural Networks and Grey-Box Modelling: A Comparison. 8 th International Conference: Urban Storm Drainage Proceedings 1999, Vol. 1. (eds), The Institution of Engineers Australia, Australia
8. Maier HR, Dandy GC. The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for the Prediction of Water Quality Parameters. Water Resour. Res. 1996, 32((4)):1013-1022.
9. May D, Sivakumar M. Techniques for Predicting Total Phosphorus in Urban Stormwater Runoff at Unmonitored Catchments. J. Australia NZ Ind. Appl. Math. (ANZIAM) 2003, 45((E)):C296-C309.
10. 1994, http://nadp.sws.uiuc,edu, National Atmospheric Deposition Program., National trends network [online]., [accessed 15 January 2003]
11. Pandit A, Gopalakrishnan G. Estimation of Annual Pollutant Loads Under Wet-Weather Conditions. J. Hydrologic Eng. 1997, 2((4)):211-218.
12. Sliva L, Williams DD. Buffer Zone Versus Whole Catchment Approaches to Studying Land Use Impact on River Water Quality. Water Res. 2001, 35((14)):3462-3472.
13. Zoppou C. Review of Urban Storm Water Models. Environ. Model. Software 2001, 16:195-231.