Mapping of cross-reference activity between journals by use of multidimensional unfolding: Implications for mapping studies

12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 443-454

  Schneider, Jesper W ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

COMMON SPACES; COMPREHENSIVE COMPARISONS; DUAL ROLE; EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS; MAPPING STUDIES; MULTIDIMENSIONAL UNFOLDING; PUBLICATION ACTIVITIES; REFERENCE NETWORK;

MAPPING;

EID: 71249105506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Borg, I. & Groenen, P.J.F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications, 2nd edition, Springer Science: New York.
2. Busing, F., Groenen, P. & Heiser, W. (2005). Avoiding degeneracy in multidimensional unfolding by penalizing on the coefficient of variation. Psychometrika, Vol. 70(1), p. 71-98.
3. Heiser, W. J. & Busing, F. M .T. A. (2004). Multidimensional scaling and unfolding of symmetric and asymmetric proximity relations. In: D. Kaplan, The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences; London: Sage Publications, pp.25-48.
4. Klavans, R. & Boyack, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, Vol. 64(3), p. 351-374.
5. Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The Challenge of Scientometrics. The development, measurement and selforganization of scientific communication. 2nd Edition. Universal Publishers: uPublish.com.
6. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, Vol. 57(5), 601-613.
7. Noma, E. (1982). An improved method for analyzing square scientometric transaction matrices. Scientometrics, Vol. 4(4), p. 297-316.
8. Price, D.J.D. (1981). The analysis of square matrices of scientometric transactions. Scientometrics, Vol. 3(1), p. 55-63.
9. Schneider, J.W. (2008). Analyzing asymmetric proximity relations in transaction matrices: The case of journal cross-reference matrices. IN: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Ed. E. Schiebel, 17-20/9 - 2008, Vienna.
10. Tijssen, R.J.W., De Leeuw, J. & Van Raan, A.F.J. (1987). Quasi-correspondence analysis on scientometric transaction matrices. Scientometrics, Vol. 11(5-6), p. 351-366.
11. Van Deun, K., Marchal, K., Heiser, W., Engelen, K., & Van Mechelen, I. (2007). Joint mapping of genes and conditions via multidimensional unfolding analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, Vol 8, 181.
12. White, H.D. & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49(4), p. 327-355.
13. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Information Science during the first decade of the Web: An enriched author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(6), 916-937.
14. Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(7), p. 947-957.