A note on adaptive Bonferroni and Holm procedures under dependence

Biometrika

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1012-1018

  Guo, Wenge ^a  

^a NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bonferroni procedure; Conditional dependence; Familywise error rate; Holm procedure; Multiple testing; Step down procedure

Indexed keywords

EID: 71249097006     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: 14643510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asp048     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BENJAMINI, Y. & HELLER, R. (2007). False discovery rate for spatial signals. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 102, 1272-1281
2. BENJAMINI, Y. & HOCHBERG, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57, 289-300.
3. BENJAMINI, Y. & HOCHBERG, Y. (2000). The adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple hypothesis testing with independent statistics. J. Educ. Behav. Statist. 25, 60-83.
4. BENJAMINI, Y.,KRIEGER, K.&YEKUTIELI, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93, 491-507.
5. GAVRILOV, Y., BENJAMINI, Y. & SARKAR, S. K. (2009). An adaptive step-down procedures with proven FDR control under independence. Ann. Statist. 37, 619-629
6. GENOVESE, C. & WASSERMAN, L. (2004). A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. Ann. Statist. 32, 1035-1061. (Pubitemid 41250292)
7. HOCHBERG, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple testing of significance. Biometrika 75, 800-802
8. HOCHBERG, Y. & BENJAMINI, Y. (1990). More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Statist. Med. 9, 811-818
9. HOLM, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple testing procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 6, 65-70.
10. JIN, J. & CAI, T. (2007). Estimating the null and the proportion of nonnull effects in large-scale multiple comparisons. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 102, 495-506.
11. MEINSHAUSEN, N. & RICE, J. (2006). Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses. Ann. Statist. 34, 1850-1873
12. SARKAR, S. K. (2006). False discovery and false non-discovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures. Scand. Ann. Statist. 34, 394-415.
13. SARKAR, S. K. & GUO, W. (2009). On a generalized false discovery rate. Ann. Statist., 37, 337-363
14. SCHWEDER, T. & SPJTVOLL, E. (1982). Plots of p-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika 69, 493-502.
15. STOREY, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 64, 479-498
16. STOREY, J. D. (2003). The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann. Statist. 31, 2013-2035
17. STOREY, J. D., TAYLOR, J. E. & SIEGMUND, D. (2004). Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 66, 187-205.
18. WU, W. (2008). On false discovery control under dependence. Ann. Statist. 36, 364-380