On false discovery control under dependence

Annals of Statistics

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 364-380

  Wu, Wei Biao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Dependence; False discovery rate; Markov random field; Multiple testing; p value

Indexed keywords

EID: 49749111978     PISSN: 00905364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1214/009053607000000730     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BAKER, JR., G. A. and KRINSKY, S. (1977). Renormalization group structure for translationally invariant ferromagnets. J. Math. Phys. 18 590-607. MR0443771
2. BENJAMINI, Y. and HOCHBERG, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 289-300, MR1325392
3. BENJAMINI, Y. and YEKUTIELI, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Statist. 29 1165-1188. MR1869245
4. BILLINGSLEY, P. (1968). Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley, New York, MR0233396
5. CHI, Z. (2005). Criticality of a false discovery rate controlling procedure. Technical Report 05-25, Dept. Statistics, Univ. Connecticut.
6. DE CASTRO, M. C. and SINGER, B. H. (2006). Controlling the false discovery Rate: A new application to account for multiple and dependent tests in local statistics of spatial association. Geographical Analysis 38 180-208.
7. FARCOMENI, A. (2004). Multiple testing procedures under dependence, with applications. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Roma "La Sapienza."
8. GENOVESE, C., LAZAR, N. A. and NICHOLS, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15 870-878.
9. GENOVESE, C. and WASSERMAN. L. (2004). A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. Ann. Statist. 32 1035-1061. MR2065197
10. GREENWOOD, P. E., MCKEAGUE, I. W. and WEFELMEYER, W. (1998). Information bounds for Gibbs samplers. Ann. Statist. 26 2128-2156. MR1700224
11. HANNAN, E. J. (1973). Central limit theorems for time series regression. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 26 157-170. MR0331683
12. MCLACHLAN, G. and PEEL, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. Wiley, New York. MR1789474
13. MEINSHAUSEN, N. and RICE. J. (2006). Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses. Ann. Statist. 34 373-393. MR2275246
14. NEWMAN, C. M. (1980). Normal fluctuations and the FKG inequalities. Comm. Math. Phys. 74 119-128. MR0576267
15. PACIFICO, M. P., GENOVESE, C., VERDINELLI, I. and WASSERMAN, L. (2004). False discovery control for random fields. J. Amer: Statist. Assoc. 99 1002-1014. MR2109490
16. QIU, X., BROOKS, A. I., KLEBANOV, L. and YAKOVLEV, N. (2005). The effects of normalization on the correlation structure of microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics 6 120.
17. SHORACK, G. R. and WELLNER. J. A. (1986). Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics. Wiley, New York. MR0838963
18. STOREY, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser B Stat. Methodol. 64 479-498. MR1924302
19. STOREY, J. D., TAYLOR, J. E. and SIEGMUND. D. (2004). Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 66 187-205. MR2035766
20. STUTE, W. (1982). The oscillation behavior of empirical processes. Ann. Probab. 10 86-107. MR0637378
21. TOBLER, W. R. (1979). Cellular geography. In Philosophy in Geography (S. Gale and G. Olsson, eds.) 379-386. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
22. WINKLER, G. (2003). Image Analysis, Random Fields and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods, 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin. MR1950762
23. WU, W. B. (2005). Nonlinear system theory: Another look at dependence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 14150-14154. MR2172215
24. WU, W. B. (2006). Empirical processes of stationary sequences. Statist. Sinica. To appear.