|
Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1026-1027
|
Differences in rectal cancer surgery: east versus west
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
CANCER RECURRENCE;
CANCER RESEARCH;
CANCER STAGING;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
JAPAN;
LETTER;
LYMPHADENECTOMY;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RECTUM CANCER;
RECTUM SURGERY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP;
BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL;
DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
JAPAN;
LYMPH NODE EXCISION;
LYMPHATIC METASTASIS;
MALE;
META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC;
NEOADJUVANT THERAPY;
NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL;
NEOPLASM STAGING;
RECTAL NEOPLASMS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URINATION DISORDERS;
WESTERN WORLD;
|
EID: 71249085236
PISSN: 14702045
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70321-3 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (14)
|
References (6)
|