Active learning for directed exploration of complex systems

Proceedings of the 26th International Conference On Machine Learning, ICML 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 89-96

  Burl, Michael C ^a   Wang, Esther ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; CURRENT SIMULATION; INFORMATION-THEORETIC APPROACH; INPUT PARAMETER; MODEL COMPLEXES; PHYSICS-BASED SIMULATION; PREDICTIVE MODELS; SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING; SYSTEM BEHAVIORS;

EDUCATION; INFORMATION THEORY; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; ROBOT LEARNING; SIMULATORS; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 71149121482     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Baram, Y., El-Yaniv, R., & Luz, K. (2004). Online choice of active learning algorithms. J. Machine Learning Research, 5, 255-291.
2. Burl, M. C., DeCoste, D., Enke, B. L., Mazzoni, D., Merline, W. J., & Scharenbroich, L. (2006). Automated knowledge discovery from simulators. SIAM Int. Conf. on Data Mining (pp. 82-93).
3. Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2001). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cj1in/libsvm.
4. Cohn, D., Atlas, L., & Ladner, R. (1994). Improving generalization with active learning. Machine Learning, 15, 201-221.
5. Durda, D. D., Bottke, W. F., Enke, B. L., Merline, W. J., Asphaug, E., Richardson, D. C., & Leinhardt, Z. M. (2004). The formation of asteroid satellites in large impacts: results from numerical simulations. Icarus, 170, 243-257.
6. Gramacy, R. B., Lee, H. K., & Macready, W. G. (2004). Parameter space exploration with gaussian process trees. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 353-360).
7. Guestrin, C., Krause, A., & Singh, A. P. (2005). Near-optimal sensor placements in gaussian processes. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 265-272).
8. Holub, A., Perona, P., & Burl, M. C. (2008). Entropy-based active learning for object recognition. Proc. Online Learning for Classification (pp. 1-8).
9. Knuth, K., Erner, P., & Frasso, S. (2007). Designing intelligent instruments. MaxEnt, Amer. Inst. of Physics, Conf. Proc. 954 (pp. 203-211).
10. Kwakernaak, H., & Sivan, R. (1972). Linear optimal control systems. Wiley-Interscience.
11. Lindenbaum, M., Markovitch, S., & Rusakov, D. (2004). Selective sampling for nearest neighbor classifiers. Machine Learning, 54, 125-152.
12. MacKay, D. (1992). Information-Based Objective Functions for Active Data Selection. Neural Computation, 4, 590-604.
13. Olivetti, E. (2008). Sampling strategies for expensive data. Doctoral dissertation, U. of Trento.
14. Pfingsten, T. (2006). Bayesian active learning for sensitivity analysis. Lec. Notes in CS., 4212, 353-364.
15. Platt, J. (1999). Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. Adv. in Large Margin Classifiers (pp. 61-74). MIT Press.
16. Sacks, J., Welch, W., Mitchell, T., & Wynn, H. (1989). Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Statistical Science, 4, 409-423.
17. Tong, S., & Koller, D. (2001). Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Machine Learning Research, 2, 45-66.
18. Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York.
19. Veeramachaneni, S., Olivetti, E., & Avesani, P. (2006). Active sampling for detecting irrelevant features. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (pp. 961-968).
20. Zadrozny, B. (2004). Learning and evaluating classifiers under sample selection bias. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (p. 114).