Electricity systems with near-zero emissions of CO2 based on wind energy and coal gasification with CCS and hydrogen storage

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 683-692

  Davison, John ^a  

^a Stoke Orchard   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CCS; CO2 capture; Costs; Electricity; Hydrogen; Wind

Indexed keywords

BUFFER STORAGE; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COAL GASIFICATION; COAL INDUSTRY; COAL STORAGE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; ELECTRICITY; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GAS EMISSIONS; GAS GENERATORS; GREENHOUSE GASES; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN STORAGE; UNDERGROUND GAS STORAGE; WIND; WIND POWER;

CO2 CAPTURE; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; GAS TURBINE POWER GENERATION; RESIDUAL GENERATION; STORAGE OF HYDROGEN; VARIABLE RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

ABATEMENT COST; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; HYDROGEN ISOTOPE; POLLUTION TAX; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; WIND POWER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 71149119255     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 2 capture and storage. Energy Procedia 1 February (1) (2009) 1521-1526
2. Amos, W.A., 1998. Cost of Storing and Transporting Hydrogen. National Renewable Energy Laboratories, NREL/TP-570-25106, November 1998.
3. Balling L., and Hofman D. Fast cycling towards bigger profits. Mod. Power Syst. 27 June (6) (2007) 24-29
4. 2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost. Energy Policy 37 2009 (2009) 915-924
5. 2 capture and storage-part A: review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 32 2 (2006) 215-246
6. Drake B., and Hubacek K. What to expect from a greater geographical dispersion of wind farms?-a risk portfolio approach. Energy Policy 35 2007 (2007) 3999-4008
7. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2009. Europe's Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Potential: An Assessment of Environmental and Economic Constraints. EEA technical report No. 6/2009, ISSN 1725-2237.
8. Floch P.-H., Gabriel S., Mansilla C., and Werkoff F. On the production of hydrogen via alkaline electrolysis during off-peak times. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 (2007) 461-467
9. Forsberg C.W. Economic implications of peak vs base-load electric costs on nuclear hydrogen systems. AIChE Annual Meeting. San Francisco, USA, November 12-17, 2006 (2006)
10. G8, 2009. G8 leaders declaration: responsible leadership for a sustainable future, 8 July 2009. www.g8italia2009.it.
11. 2 capture: impacts on IGCC plant performance in a high elevation application using western sub-bituminous coal. Gasification Technologies Conference, San Francisco, USA, October 15-17, 2007. www.gasification.org.
12. González A., McKeogh E., and Gallachóir B.O. The role of hydrogen in high wind energy penetration electricity systems: the Irish case. Renew. Energy 29 (2003) 471-489
13. IEA (International Energy Agency), 2005. Prospects for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells, IEA/OECD, Paris, France.
14. IEA GHG (IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme), 2004. Improvement in Power Generation with Post Combustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide. Report PH4/33, November 2004.
15. 2 Capture to Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants. Report 2005/1, January 2005.
16. 2 Capture. Report 2007/13, September 2007.
17. 2 Capture-Updated Economic Analysis. Report 2008/9, August 2008.
18. 2 Emissions. Technical review 2009/TR3, May 2009.
19. IPCC, 2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge University Press, ISBN-13 978-0-521-68551-1.
20. Joffe, D., Strachan, N., Balta-Ozkan, N., 2007. Representation of hydrogen in the UK, US and Netherlands MARKAL energy system models. UK SHEC social science working paper no. 29, www.psi.org.uk.
21. Klara, 2007. Cost and Performance Baselines for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity, Final Report. DOE/NETL-2007/1281, National Energy Technology Laboratory, USA, May 2007.
22. Ladwig M., Stevens M., and Tripod B. Clean optimised CCGT solutions-three UK plants compared. Mod. Power Syst. 28 November (11) (2008) 29-32
23. Modern Power Systems. Dealing with cycling: TRD 301 and the Euro Norm compared. Mod. Power Syst. 27 October (10) (2007) 33-38
24. National Grid, 2009. www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Data/Demand+data/.
25. NETA, 2009. www.bmreports.com/bsp/bsp_home.htm.
26. Norris, D.P., Tabberer, R.J., Dimou, E., Zhang, N., 2004. Techno-economic Evaluation-Cleaner Coal Plant Operability. Report No. COAL R238 DTI/Pub URN 04/698, November 2004.
27. Parker G.D. Hydrogen cavern operation. Presentation at IPCE 2006, Conoco Phillips. Bartlesville, OK, USA (2006)
28. Poyry, 2009. Impact of Intermittency: How Wind Variability Could Change the Shape of The British and Irish Electricity Markets, Summary Report, July 2009.
29. Praxair, 2009. Hydrogen Storage Cavern Spec Sheet, www.praxair.com.
30. Roads2HyCom, 2009. Large Hydrogen Underground Storage, www.ika.rwth-aachen.de.
31. Scottish and Southern Energy, 2009. Preliminary Results for the Year to 31 March 2009, 21 May 2009, www.scottish-southern.co.uk.
32. Sinden G. Characteristics of the UK wind resource: long-term patterns and relationships to electricity demand. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 112-127
33. Starr F., Tzimas E., Steen M., and Peteves S. Flexibility in the production of hydrogen and electricity from fossil fuel power plants. Proc. Int. Hydrogen Congress and Exhibition IHEC 2005. Istanbul, Turkey, 13-15 July 2005 (2005) 2005
34. UK Energy Research Centre, 2009. Making the Transition to a Secure and Low Carbon Energy System: Synthesis Report. UKERC Report S3097, 2009, www.ukerc.ac.uk.