The mating system of polar bears: A genetic approach

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 87, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1195-1209

  Zeyl, E ^a   Aars, J ^b   Ehrich, D ^c   Bachmann, L ^a   Wiig, O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN POLAR INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE STRUCTURE; BEAR; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; PARENTAGE; PATERNITY; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEX RATIO; SIBLING;

ARCTIC OCEAN; BARENTS SEA;

URSUS MARITIMUS;

EID: 71149099891     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/Z09-107     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aars, J., Dallas, J.F., Piertney, S.B., Marshall, F., Gow, J.L., Telfer, S., and Lambin, X. 2006. Widespread gene flow and high genetic variability in populations of water voles Arvicola terrestris in patchy habitats. Mol. Ecol. 15(6): 1455-1466. doi:10.1111/j. 1365-294X.2006.02889.x. PMID:16629803.
2. Aars, J., Marques, T.A., Buckland, S.T., Andersen, M., Belikov, S., Boltunov, A.N., and Wiig, Ø. 2009. Estimating the Barents Sea polar bear subpopulation size. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 25(1): 35-52. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00228.x.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
4. Baker, R.J., Makova, K.D., and Chesser, R.K. 1999. Microsatellites indicate a high frequency of multiple paternity in Apodemus (Rodentia). Mol. Ecol. 8(1): 107-111. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X. 1999.00541.x. PMID:12187947.
5. Bellemain, E., Swenson, J.E., and Taberlet, P. 2006a. Mating strategies in relation to sexually selected infanticide in a non-social carnivore: the brown bear. Ethology, 112(3): 238-246. doi:10. 1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01152.x.
6. Bellemain, E., Zedrosser, A., Manel, S., Waits, L., Taberlet, P., and Swenson, J.E. 2006b. The dilemma of female mate selection in the brown bear, a species with sexually selected infanticide. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 273(1584): 283-291. doi:10. 1098/rspb.2005.3331.
7. Boness, D.J. 1991. Chap. 1. Determinants of mating systems in the Otariidae (Pinnipedia). In Behaviour of pinnipeds. Edited by Deane Renouf. Chapman and Hall, Bristol, UK. pp. 1-44.
8. Boness, D.J., Bowen, W.D., and Oftedal, O.T. 1988. Evidence of polygyny from spatial patterns of hooded seals (Cystophora cristata). Can. J. Zool. 66(3): 703-706. doi:10.1139/z88-104.
9. Bonin, A., Bellemain, E., Bronken Eidesen, P., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C., and Taberlet, P. 2004. How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol. Ecol. 13(11): 3261-3273. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02346.x. PMID:15487987.
10. Bunnell, F.L., and Tait, D.E.N. 1981. Population dynamics of bears - implications. In Dynamics of large mammal populations. Edited by C.W. Fowler and B.R. Smith. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 75-98.
11. Burton, C. 2002. Microsatellite analysis of multiple paternity and male reproductive success in the promiscuous snowshoe hare. Can. J. Zool. 80(11): 1948-1956. doi:10.1139/z02-187.
12. Calvert, W., and Ramsay, M. 1998. Evaluation of age determination of polar bears by counts of cementum growth layer groups. Ursus, 10: 449-453.
13. Cassini, M.H. 1999. The evolution of reproductive systems in pinnipeds. Behav. Ecol. 10(5): 612-616. doi:10.1093/beheco/10.5.612.
14. Cercueil, A., Bellemain, E., and Manel, S. 2002. PARENTE: computer program for parentage analysis. J. Hered. 93(6): 458-459. doi:10.1093/jhered/93.6.458.PMID:12642650.
15. Christensen-Dalsgaard, S.N. 2006. Temporal patterns in age structure of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in Svalbard, with special emphasis on validation of age determination. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø and Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway.
16. Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1989. Review lecture: Mammalian mating systems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 236(1285): 339-372. doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0027.PMID:2567517.
17. Costello, C.M., Creel, S.R., Kalinowski, S.T., Vu, N.V., and Quigley, H.B. 2008. Sex-biased natal dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in American black bears as revealed by spatial genetic analyses. Mol. Ecol. 17(21): 4713-4723. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03930.x.PMID:18828781.
18. Crawford, J.C., Liu, Z., Nelson, T.A., Nielsen, C.K., and Bloomquist, C.K. 2008. Microsatellite analysis of mating and kinship in beavers (Castor canadensis). J. Mammal. 89(3): 575-581. doi:10.1644/07-MAMM-A-251R1.1.
19. Crompton, A.E., Obbard, M.E., Petersen, S.D., and Wilson, P.J. 2008. Population genetic structure in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Hudson Bay, Canada: implications of future climate change. Biol. Conserv. 141(10): 2528-2539. doi:10.1016/j. biocon.2008.07.018.
20. Davies, N.B., and Lundberg, A. 1984. Food distribution and a variable mating system in the dunnock, Prunella modularis. J. Anim. Ecol. 53(3): 895-912. doi:10.2307/4666.
21. DeMaster, D.P., and Stirling, I. 1981. Ursus maritimus. Mamm. Species, 145(145): 1-7. doi:10.2307/3503828.
22. Derocher, A.E. 2005. Population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway. Popul. Ecol. 47(3): 267-275. doi:10.1007/s10144-005-0231-2.
23. Derocher, A.E., and Stirling, I. 1998. Geographic variation in growth of polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J. Zool. (Lond.), 245(1): 65-72. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00072.x.
24. Derocher, A.E., Stirling, I., and Calvert, W. 1997. Male-biased harvesting of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. J. Wildl. Manage. 61(4): 1075-1082. doi:10.2307/3802104.
25. Derocher, A.E., Wiig, Ø., and Andersen, M. 2002. Diet composition of polar bears in Svalbard and the western Barents Sea. Polar Biol. 25: 448-452. doi:10.1007/s00300-002-0364-0.
26. Derocher, A.E., Andersen, M., and Wiig, Ø. 2005. Sexual dimorphism of polar bears. J. Mammal. 86(5): 895-901. doi:10.1644/ 1545-1542(2005)86[895:SDOPB]2.0.CO;2.
27. DeYoung, R.W., Demarais, S., Gonzales, R.A., Honeycutt, R.L., and Gee, K.L. 2002.Multiple paternity inwhite-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) revealed by DNA microsatellites. J. Mammal. 83(3): 884-892. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0884:MPIWTD>2.0. CO;2.
28. Dyck, M.G. 2006. Characteristics of polar bears killed in defense of life and property in Nunavut, Canada, 1970-2000. Ursus, 17(1): 52-62. doi:10.2192/1537-6176(2006)17[52:COPBKI]2.0. CO;2.
29. Ferguson, S.H., Taylor, M.K., Born, E.W., and Messier, F. 1998. Fractals, sea-ice landscape and spatial patterns of polar bears. J. Biogeogr. 25: 1081-1092.
30. Gehrt, S.D., and Fritzell, E.K. 1998. Resource distribution, female home range dispersion and male spatial interactions: group structure in a solitary carnivore. Anim. Behav. 55(5): 1211-1227. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0657. PMID:9632506
31. Hosken, D.J., and Stockley, P. 2003. Benefits of polyandry: a life history perspective. Evol. Biol. 33: 173-194.
32. Ims, R.A. 1988. The potential for sexual selection in males: effect of sex ratio and spatiotemporal distribution of receptive females. Evol. Ecol. 2(4): 338-352. doi:10.1007/BF02207565.
33. Ishibashi, Y., and Saitoh, T. 2008. Effect of local density of males on the occurrence of multimale mating in gray-sided voles (Myodes rufocanus). J. Mammal. 89(2): 388-397. doi:10.1644/ 07-MAMM-A-036.1.
34. Isvaran, K., and Clutton-Brock, T. 2007. Ecological correlates of extra-group paternity in mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 274(1607): 219-224. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3723.
35. Jones, A.G., and Ardren, W.R. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 12(10): 2511-2523. doi:10. 1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01928.x. PMID:12969458.
36. Kalinowski, S.T., Wagner, A.P., and Taper, M.L. 2006. ML-Relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6(2): 576-579. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01256.x.
37. Kamler, J.F., Ballard, W.B., Lemons, P.R., and Mote, K. 2004. Variation in mating system and group structure in two populations of swift foxes, Vulpes velox. Anim. Behav. 68(1): 83-88. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.017.
38. Kokko, H., and Rankin, D.J. 2006. Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361(1466): 319-334. doi:10.1098/rstb. 2005.1784. PMID:16612890.
39. Kovacs, K.M. 1995. Harp and hooded seal reproductive behavior and energetics - A case study in the determinants of mating systems in pinnipeds. In Whales, seals, fish and man. Edited by A. Schytte-Blix, L. Walloe, and O. Ulltang. Elsevier Science B, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 329-335.
40. Kovacs, K.M., Lydersen, C., Hammill, M.O., White, B.N., Wilson, P.J., and Malik, S. 1997. A harp seal hooded seal hybrid. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 13(3): 460-468. doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1997.tb00652.x.
41. Le Boeuf, B.J. 1991. Pinniped mating systems on land, ice and in the water: emphasis on the Phocidae. In Behaviour of pinnipeds. Edited by Deane Renouf. Chapman and Hall, Bristol, UK. pp. 45-65.
42. Le Boeuf, B.J., and Reiter, J. 1988. Lifetime reproductive success in northern elephant seals. In Reproductive success. Edited by T.H. Clutton-Brock. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 344-362.
43. Lønø, O. 1970. The polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps) in the Svalbard area. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter. No. 149.
44. Mayor, L.R., and Balding, D.J. 2006. Discrimination of half-siblings when maternal genotypes are known. Forensic Sci. Int. 159(2-3): 141-147. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.07.007. PMID:16153794.
45. McLoughlin, P.D., Taylor, M.K., and Messier, F. 2005. Conservation risks of male-selective harvest for mammals with low reproductive potential. J. Wildl. Manag. 69: 1592-1600. doi:(2005)69[1592:CROMHF]2.0.CO;2. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint. 2005.07.007. PMID:16153794.
46. McRae, S.B., and Kovacs, K.M. 1994. Paternity exclusion by DNA fingerprinting, and mate guarding in the hooded seal Cystophora cristata. Mol. Ecol. 3(2): 101-107. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00110.x. PMID:8019687.
47. Molnár, P.K., Derocher, A.E., Lewis, M.A., and Taylor, M.K. 2008. Modelling the mating system of polar bears: a mechanistic approach to the Allee effect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275(1631): 217-226. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1307.
48. Morrissey, M.B., and Wilson, A.J. 2005. The potential costs of accounting for genotypic errors in molecular parentage analyses. Mol. Ecol. 14(13): 4111-4121. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005. 02708.x. PMID:16262862.
49. Paetkau, D., and Strobeck, C. 1994. Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations. Mol. Ecol. 3(5): 489-495. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00127.x. PMID:7952329.
50. Paetkau, D., Amstrup, S.C., Born, E.W., Calvert, W., Derocher, A.E., Garner, G.W., Messier, F., Stirling, I., Taylor, M.K., Wiig, Ø., and Strobeck, C. 1999. Genetic structure of the world's polar bear populations. Mol. Ecol. 8(10): 1571-1584. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00733.x. PMID:10583821.
51. Peakall, R., and Smouse, P. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6(1): 288-295. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005. 01155.x.
52. Pemberton, J.M., Coltman, D.W., Smith, J.A., and Pilkington, J.G. 1999. Molecular analysis of a promiscuous, fluctuating mating system. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68(1-2): 289-301. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01170.x.
53. Prestrud, P., and Strirling, I. 1994. The international polar bear agreement and the current status of polar bear conservation. Aquat. Mamm. 20: 113-124.
54. Ramsay, M.A., and Stirling, I. 1986. On the mating system of polar bears. Can. J. Zool. 64: 2142-2151. doi:10.1139/z86-329.
55. Randall, D.A., Pollinger, J.P., Wayne, R.K., Tallents, L.A., Johnson, P.J., and Macdonald, D.W. 2007. Inbreeding is reduced by female-biased dispersal and mating behavior in Ethiopian wolves. Behav. Ecol. 18(3): 579-589. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm010.
56. Raymond, M., and Rousset, F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248-249.
57. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.r-project.org/ [accessed 30 October 2008].
58. Rosing-Asvid, A., Born, E.W., and Kingsley, M.C.S. 2002. Age at sexual maturity of males and timing of the mating season of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in Greenland. Polar Biol. 25: 878-883. doi:10.1007/s00300-002-0430-7.
59. Sambrook, J., and Russell, D.W. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
60. Say, L., Pontier, D., and Natoli, E. 1999. High variation in multiple paternity of domestic cats (Felis catus L.) in relation to environmental conditions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266: 2071-2074. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0889.
61. Schenk, A., and Kovacs, K.M. 1995. Multiple mating between black bears revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Anim. Behav. 50(6): 1483-1490. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80005-0.
62. Sinclair, E.A., Black, H.L., and Crandall, K.A. 2003. Population structure and paternity in an american black bear (Ursus americanus) population using microsatellite DNA. West. N. Am. Nat. 63: 489-497.
63. Smith, T.G., and Lydersen, C. 1991. Availability of suitable landfast ice and predation as factors limiting ringed seal populations, Phoca hispida, in Svalbard. Polar Res. 10(2): 585-594. doi:10. 1111/j.1751-8369.1991.tb00676.x.
64. Stirling, I., Andriashek, D., and Calvert, W. 1993. Habitat preference of polar bears in the western Canadian Arctic in late winter and spring. Polar Rec. (Gr. Brit.), 29(168): 13-24. doi:10.1017/S0032247400023172.
65. Stockley, P., Searle, J.B., Macdonald, D.W., and Jones, C.S. 1993. Female multiple mating behaviour in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 254(1341): 173-179. doi:10.1098/rspb.1993.0143.
66. Taylor, M., McLoughlin, P.D., and Messier, F. 2008. Sex-selective harvesting of polar bears Ursus maritumus. Wildl. Biol. 14: 52-60. doi:0.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[52:SHOPBU]2.0.CO;2.
67. Tumanov, I.L. 2001. Reproductive biology of captive polar bears. Ursus, 12: 107-108.3
68. Waits, L.P., Luikart, G., and Taberlet, P. 2001. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol. Ecol. 10(1): 249-256. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x. PMID:11251803.
69. Wiig, Ø. 1995. Distribution of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. J. Zool. (Lond.), 237(4): 515-529. doi:10.1111/j. 1469-7998.1995.tb05012.x.
70. Wiig, Ø., and Derocher, A.E. 1999. Application of aerial survey methods to polar bears in the Barents Sea. In Marine mammal survey and assessment methods. Edited by G.W. Garner, S.C. Amstrup, J.L. Laake, B.F.J. Manly, L.L. McDonald, and D.G. Robertson. A.A. Bolkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Holland. pp. 27-36.
71. Wiig, Ø., Gjertz, I., Hansson, R., and Thomassen, J. 1992. Breeding behaviour of polar bears in Hornsund, Svalbard. Polar Rec. (Gr. Brit.), 28(165): 157-159. doi:10.1017/S0032247400013474.
72. Zeyl, E., Aars, J., Ehrich, D., and Wiig, Ø. 2009. Families in space: relatedness in the Barents Sea population of polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Mol. Ecol. 18(4): 735-749. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04049.x. PMID:19175504.