Promoting the use of outcome measures by an educational programme for physiotherapists in stroke rehabilitation: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1005-1017

  Van Peppen, Roland P S ^a   Schuurmans, M J ^a   Stutterheim, E C ^a   Lindeman, E ^b   Van Meeteren, N L U ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSIOTHERAPIST ATTITUDE; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CARE; SELF REPORT; TEACHER;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PILOT PROJECTS; STROKE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 71049174870     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509338999     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Australian Physiotherapy Association. APA Position Statement - Clinical justification and outcome measures. Accessed from https://apa.advsol.com.au/staticcontent/staticpages/position_statements/ public/ClinicalJustification&Outcome%20Measures.pdf 2003.
2. Abrams D., Davidson M., Harrick J., Harcourt P., Zylinski M., Clancy J. Monitoring the change: Current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther 2006; 11: 46-53.
3. Akinpelu AO, Eluchie NC Familiarity with, knowledge, and utilization of standardized outcome measures among physiotherapists in Nigeria. Physiother Theory Pract 2006; 22: 61-72.
4. Chesson R., Macleod M., Massie S. Outcome measures used in therapy departments in Scotland. Physiotherapy 1996; 82: 673-79.
5. Lennon S. Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: A survey. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 455-61.
6. Maher C., Williams M. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physiotherapy management of lung transplant patients in Australia and New Zealand. Physiother Theory Pract 2005; 21: 201-17.
7. Mayo N., Cole B., Dowler J., Gowland C., Finch E. Use of outcome measures in physiotherapy: Survey of current practice. Can J Rehabil 1994; 7: 81-82.
8. Oostendorp RAB, Pluimers DJ, Nijhuis-van, der Sanden MWG, Wensing M. Physiotherapy patient documentation: The Achilles heel of evidence-based practice? [In Dutch: FysiotherDpeutische verslaglegging: de Achilleshiel voor Evidence-based Practice (EBP)?]. Ned Tijdschr v Fysioth 2006; 116: 56-61.
9. Van Peppen RPS, Maissan JF, Van Genderen FR, Van Dolder R., Van Meeteren NLU Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: A survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiother Res Int 2008; 13: 255-70.
10. Jette DU, Bacon K., Batty C. et al. Evidence-based practice: Beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 786-805.
11. Parker-Taillon D. CPA initiatives put the spotlight on evidence-based practice in physiotherapy. Physiother Can 2002; 24: 12-15.
12. Van Peppen RPS, Hendriks HJM, Van Meeteren NLU, Helders PJM, Kwakkel G. The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The Netherlands: A systematic review of available evidence. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 767-83.
13. Turner-Stokes L., Turner-Stokes T. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 306-13.
14. Pollock AS, Legg L., Langhorne P., Sellars C. Barriers to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 611-17.
15. Hammond R. Evaluation of physiotherapy by measuring outcome. Physiotherapy 2000; 86: 170-72.
16. Glasziou P., Irwig L., Mant D. Monitoring in chronic disease: A rational approach. BMJ 2005; 330: 644-48.
17. Lomas J. Teaching old (and not so old) does new tricks: Effective ways to implement research findings. In Dunn EV, Norton PG, Steward M, Tudiver F, Bass MJ. eds. Disseminating research/changing practice. London, Sage, 1993.
18. Powell CV How to implement change in clinical practice. Paediatr Respir Rev 2003; 4: 340-46.
19. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol 50. 179-211.
20. Grol R., Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003; 362: 1225-30.
21. Dolmans DH, Gijselaers WH, Moust JH, de Grave WS, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Med Teach 2002; 24: 173-80.
22. Schmidt HG, van der Arend A., Moust JH, Kokx I., Boon L. Influence of tutors' subject-matter expertise on student effort and sachievement in problem-based learning. Acad Med 1993; 68: 784-91.
23. Portney LG, Watkins MP Foundations of clinical research applications to practice, second edition. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 2000.
24. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M. et al. Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour, a manual for health services researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle, 2004.
25. Eccles M., Grimshaw J., Walker A., Johnston M., Pitts N. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: The use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 107-12.
26. Groves M., Rego P., O'Rourke P. Tutoring in problem-based learning medical curricula: The influence of tutor background and style on effectiveness. BMC Med Educ 2005; 5: 20.
27. Rogers EM Diffusion of innovations. New York, The Free Press, 1983.
28. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Kant I. [Roaming through the methodology. VIII. Pilot studies: Sense and nonsense]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998; 142: 2142-45.
29. Lancaster GA, Dodd S., Williamson PR Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004; 10: 307-12.
30. Rothstein JM, Echternach JL, Riddle DL The Hypothesis-Oriented Algorithm for Clinicians II (HOAC II): A guide for patient management. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 455-70.
31. Vreeman DJ, Taggard SL, Rhine MD, Worrell TW Evidence for electronic health record systems in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 434-46.
32. Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. Vox Sang 2002; 83(suppl 1): 383-86.
33. Steiner WA, Ryser L., Huber E., Uebelhart D., Aeschlimann A., Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 1098-107.
34. World Health Organization. ICF-introduction. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO, 2001. http://www.who.int/classification/icf/intros/ICF-Eng-Intro.pdf
35. Schenkman M., Deutsch JE, Gill-Body KM An integrated framework for decision making in neurologic physical therapist practice. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 1681-702.