The price of tolerance: Wolf damage payments after recovery

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 18, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 4003-4021

  Treves, Adrian ^a   Jurewicz, Randle L ^b   Naughton Treves, Lisa ^a,c   Wilcove, David S ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^c Center for Applied Biodiversity Science   (United States)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptively; Compensation; Manage; Programs

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CANID; COMPENSATION SYSTEM; DAMAGE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

CANIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS; CANIS LUPUS;

EID: 71049155887     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9695-2     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bangs EE et al (1998) Status of gray wolf restoration in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming. Wildl Soc Bull 26: 785-793.
2. Blume L, Rubinfeld B (1984) Compensation for takings: an economic analysis. Calif Leg Rev 569: 620-621.
3. Breitenmoser U, Angst C (2001) Statistics of damage caused by large carnivores in Europe. Carniv Damage Prev News 4: 11-13.
4. Brown JS (1995) Restoration ecology: living with the prime directive. In: Bowles ML, Whelan CJ (eds) Restoration of endangered species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 355-380.
5. Bruskotter JT et al (2007) Are attitudes toward wolves changing? A case study in Utah. Biol Conserv 139: 211-218.
6. Bulte EH, Rondeau D (2005) Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation. J Wildl Manag 69: 14-19.
7. Cilliers D (2003) South African cheetah compensation fund. Carniv Damage Prev News 6: 15-16.
8. Decker DJ et al (2006) Situation-specific "impact dependency" as a determinant of management acceptability: insights from wolf and grizzly bear management in Alaska. Wildl Soc Bull 34: 426-432.
9. Dillman DA (2007) Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored designed method. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. Doremus H (1999) Restoring endangered species: the importance of being wild. The Harvard Environmental Law Review 23.
11. Ericsson G et al (2004) Support for hunting as a means of wolf Canis lupus population control in Sweden. Wildl Biol 10: 269-276.
12. Ericsson G et al (2007) Wolves as a symbol of people's willingness to pay for large carnivore conservation. Soc Nat Resour 21: 294-309.
13. Ferraro PJ, Kiss A (2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298: 1718-1719.
14. Finance JCo (2005) Endangered resources funding, Paper #507. Legislative Fiscal Bureau, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
15. Fritts SH et al (1992) Trends and management of wolf-livestock conflicts in Minnesota. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 181, Washington, DC.
16. Gill RB (1996) The wildlife professional subculture: the case of the crazy aunt. Human Dimens Wildl 1: 60-69.
17. Hazzah L (2006) Living among lions (panthera leo): coexistence or killing? Community attitudes towards conservation initiatives and the motivations behind lion killing in Kenyan Maasailand. Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
18. Heberlein TA (2000) The gun, the dog and the thermos: culture and hunting in Sweden and the United States. Swed Am Fall 2000: 24-29.
19. Heberlein TA, Ericsson G (2005) Ties to the countryside: accounting for urbanites attitudes toward hunting, wolves, and wildlife. Human Dimens Wildl 10: 213-227.
20. Hötte M, Bereznuk S (2001) Compensation for livestock kills by tigers and leopards in Russia. Carniv Damage Prev News 3: 6-7.
21. Jackson R, Wangchuk R (2001) Linking snow leopard conservation and people-wildlife conflict resolution: grassroots measures to protect the endangered snow leopard from herder retribution. Endanger Species Updat 18: 138-141.
22. Jacobson CA, Decker DJ (2008) Governance of state wildlife management: reform and revive or resist and retrench? Soc Nat Resour 21: 441-448.
23. James JM, Bolstein R (1992) Large monetary incentives and their effect on mail survey response rates. Public Opin Q 56: 442-453.
24. Kapp K (2006) Socioecological correlates of human-black bear conflict in northern Wisconsin. Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
25. Karanth KU, Madhusudan MD (2002) Mitigating human-wildlife conflicts in southern Asia. In: Terborgh J et al (eds) Making parks work: identifying key factors to implementing parks in the tropics. Island Press, Covelo, pp 250-264.
26. Karlsson J (2007) Management of wolf and lynx conflicts with human interests. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Ecology, SLU. Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae vol 2007: 59.
27. Karlsson K, Sjostrom M (2007) Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biol Conserv 137: 610-616.
28. Knight J (2003) Waiting for wolves in Japan. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Linnell JDC, Broseth H (2003) Compensation for large carnivore depredation of domestic sheep. Carniv Damage Prev News 6: 11-13.
30. Mech LD (1998) Estimated costs of maintaining a recovered wolf population in agricultural regions of Minnesota. Wildl Soc Bull 26: 817-822.
31. Montag J (2003) Compensation and predator conservation: limitations of compensation. Carniv Damage Prev News 6: 2-6.
32. Montag J et al (2003) Political & social viability of predator compensation programs in the west. School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, 138 pp.
33. Naughton-Treves L et al (2003) Paying for tolerance: the impact of livestock depredation and compensation payments on rural citizens' attitudes toward wolves. Conserv Biol 17: 1500-1511.
34. Nemtzov SC (2003) A short-lived wolf depredation compensation program in Israel. Carniv Damage Prev News 6: 16-17.
35. Nie M (2003) Beyond wolves: the politics of wolf recovery and management. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
36. Nyhus PJ et al (2003) Taking the bite out of wildlife damage: the challenges of wildlife compensation schemes. Conserv Pract 4: 37-40.
37. Phillips MK, Smith DW (1998) Gray wolves and private landowners in the Greater Yellowstone Area. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 63: 443-450.
38. Refsnider R (2009) The role of the endangered species act in midwest wolf recovery. In: Wydeven AP et al (eds) Recovery of gray wolves in the Great Lakes region of the United States: an endangered species success story, Chap 20. Springer, New York.
39. Roberts DH (1986) Determination of predators responsible for killing small livestock. S Afr J Wildl Res 16: 150-152.
40. Rodriguez SL (2008) Perceptions and attitudes of a Maasai community regarding wildlife-damage compensation, conservation, and the predators that prey on their livestock. Human Dimens Wildl 13: 205-206.
41. Schanning K (2009) Human dimensions: public opinion research concerning wolves in the Great Lakes States of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. In: Wydeven AP et al (eds) Recovery of gray wolves in the great Lakes region of the United States: an endangered species success story. Springer, New York.
42. Schwerdtner K, Gruber B (2007) A conceptual framework for damage compensation schemes. Biol Conserv 134: 354-360.
43. Smyth J et al (2006) Comparing check-all and forced-choice question formats in web surveys. Public Opin Q 70: 66-77.
44. Stroup R (1997) The economics of compensating property owners. Contemp Econ Policy XV(4): 55-57.
45. Thompson JG (1993) Addressing the human dimensions of wolf reintroduction: an example using estimates of livestock depredation and costs of compensation. Soc Nat Resour 6: 165-179.
46. Thompson BH Jr (1997) The endangered species act: a case study in takings & incentives. Stanf Law Rev 49: 305-380.
47. Torres SG et al (1996) Mountain lion and human activity in California: testing speculations. Wildl Soc Bull 24: 457-460.
48. Treves A (2008) Beyond recovery: Wisconsin's wolf policy 1980-2008. Human Dimens Wildl 13: 329-338.
49. Treves A et al (2002) Wolf depredation on domestic animals: control and compensation in Wisconsin, 1976-2000. Wildl Soc Bull 30: 231-241.
50. Treves A et al (2004) Predicting human-carnivore conflict: a spatial model based on 25 years of wolf predation on livestock. Conserv Biol 18: 114-125.
51. USDA-WS (2005) Wildlife services annual tables. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services.
52. USFWS (2009) Final rule to identify the western great lakes populations of gray wolves as a distinct population segment; final rule to identify the northern Rocky Mountain population of gray wolf as a distinct population segment; and to revise the list of endangered and Federal Register Notice: threatened wildlife. Fed Regist 74: 15070-15123.
53. Wagner KK et al (1997) Compensation programs for wildlife damage in North America. Wildl Soc Bull 25: 312-319.
54. WDNR (2005) Wisconsin's Fish & Wildlife Annual Report 2004-2005. PUB-CE-259 2006. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
55. WDNR (2007a) Guidelines for conducting depredation control on wolves in Wisconsin following federal delisting: guidelines for 2007-2008. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Park Falls.
56. WDNR (2007b) Wisconsin Wolf Management Plan 2007 Revision. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
57. Wildlife Do (2008) The Bailey wildlife foundation wolf compensation trust, Washington, DC.
58. Williams CK et al (2002) A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972-2000). Wildl Soc Bull 30: 575-584.
59. Wilson MA (1999) Appendix H: public attitudes towards wolves in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison.
60. Wydeven AP et al (eds) (2009) Recovery of gray wolves in the great Lakes region of the United States: an endangered species success story. Springer, New York.
61. Zabel A, Holm-Muller K (2008) Conservation performance payments for carnivore conservation in Sweden. Conserv Biol 22: 247-251.