Performance of Common Clinician- and Self-Report Measures in Assessing the Function of Community-Dwelling People With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 90, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2116-2124

  Cheville, Andrea L ^a   Basford, Jeffrey R ^a   Troxel, Andrea B ^b   Kornblith, Alice B ^c  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Neoplasms; Outcome assessment; Quality of life; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST METASTASIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY LIVING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 71049139443     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Williams G., Robertson V., Greenwood K., Goldie P., and Morris M.E. The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the high-level mobility assessment tool for measuring the mobility limitations of people with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 (2006) 437-442
2. Jette A.M. Assessing disability in studies on physical activity. Am J Prev Med 25 3 Suppl 2 (2003) 122-128
3. Rose M., Bjorner J.B., Becker J., Fries J.F., and Ware J.E. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 61 (2008) 17-33
4. Garcia S.F., Cella D., Clauser S.B., et al. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol 25 (2007) 5106-5112
5. Haley S.M., Gandek B., Siebens H., et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 (2008) 275-283
6. Jette A.M., Haley S.M., Tao W., et al. Prospective evaluation of the AM-PAC-CAT in outpatient rehabilitation settings. Phys Ther 87 (2007) 385-398
7. Fries J.F., Bruce B., Bjorner J., and Rose M. More relevant, precise, and efficient items for assessment of physical function and disability: moving beyond the classic instruments. Ann Rheum Dis 65 Suppl 3 (2006) i16-i21
8. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58 (2008) 71-96
9. McCarthy E.P., Phillips R.S., Zhong Z., Drews R.E., and Lynn J. Dying with cancer: patients' function, symptoms, and care preferences as death approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc 48 Suppl 5 (2000) S110-S121
10. Cheville A.L., Troxel A.B., Basford J.R., and Kornblith A.B. Prevalence and treatment patterns of physical impairments in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26 (2008) 2621-2629
11. Crooks V., Waller S., and Smith T. The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol 46 (1991) M139-M144
12. Extermann M., Overcash J., and Lyman G.H. Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 16 (1998) 1582-1587
13. Schag C., and Heinrich R. Karnofsky Performance Status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2 (1984) 187-193
14. O'Dell M., and Lubeck D.P. Validity of the Karnofsky Performance Status in an HIV-infected sample. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 10 (1995) 350-357
15. Fillenbaum G.G., and Smyer M.A. The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol 36 (1981) 428-434
16. Bailey C., Corner J., Addington-Hall J., Kumar D., and Haviland J. Older patients' experiences of treatment for colorectal cancer: an analysis of functional status and service use. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 13 (2004) 483-493
17. Stewart A.W. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach (1992), Univ Pr, Durham
18. Ware Jr. J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473-483
19. Hays R.D., Sherbourne C.D., and Mazel R.M. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ 2 (1993) 217-227
20. Brazier J.E., Harper R., Jones N.M., et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 305 (1992) 160-164
21. McHorney C.A., Ware Jr. J.E., Rogers W., Raczek A.E., and Lu J.F. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 30 Suppl 5 (1992) MS253-MS265
22. Granger C.V., Cotter A.C., Hamilton B.B., and Fiedler R.C. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993) 133-138
23. Granger C.V., Cotter A.C., Hamilton B.B., Fiedler R.C., and Hens M.M. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71 (1990) 870-875
24. Huang M.E., Cifu D.X., and Keyser-Marcus L. Functional outcomes in patients with brain tumor after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison with traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 79 (2000) 327-335
25. O'Dell M.W., Barr K., Spanier D., and Warnick R.E. Functional outcome of inpatient rehabilitation in persons with brain tumors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 (1998) 1530-1534
26. D'Agostino R.B., Balanger A., and D'Agostino J.R. A suggestions for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am Stat 44 (1990) 316-321
27. Royston P. sg3.5: comment on sg3.4 and an improved D'Agostino test. Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints 1 (1991) 110-112
28. Liang K., and Zeger S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73 (1986) 13-22
29. Jette A.M., Haley S.M., and Ni P. Comparison of functional status tools used in post-acute care. Health Care Financ Rev 24 (2003) 13-24
30. Jette A.M., and Haley S.M. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med 37 (2005) 339-345
31. Lunney J.R., Lynn J., Foley D.J., Lipson S., and Guralnik J.M. Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA 289 (2003) 2387-2392
32. Guadagnoli E., and Mor V. Daily living needs of cancer outpatients. J Community Health 16 (1991) 37-47
33. Streiner D.L., and Norman G.R. Scaling responses. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. (2008), Oxford Univ Pr, New York
34. Hoeymans N., Feskens E.J., van den Bos G.A., and Kromhout D. Measuring functional status: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990-1993). J Clin Epidemiol 49 (1996) 1103-1110
35. Kivinen P., Sulkava R., Halonen P., and Nissinen A. Self-reported and performance-based functional status and associated factors among elderly men: the Finnish cohorts of the Seven Countries Study. J Clin Epidemiol 51 (1998) 1243-1252
36. Lee C.E., Simmonds M.J., Novy D.M., and Jones S. Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 (2001) 227-231
37. Reuben D.B., Valle L.A., Hays R.D., and Siu A.L. Measuring physical function in community-dwelling older persons: a comparison of self-administered, interviewer-administered, and performance-based measures. J Am Geriatr Soc 43 (1995) 17-23
38. Simonsick E.M., Newman A.B., Nevitt M.C., et al. Measuring higher level physical function in well-functioning older adults: expanding familiar approaches in the Health ABC study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56 (2001) M644-M649
39. Albert S.M., Bear-Lehman J., Burkhardt A., Merete-Roa B., Noboa-Lemonier R., and Teresi J. Variation in sources of clinician-rated and self-rated instrumental activities of daily living disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61 (2006) 826-831
40. Mallinson T., Cella D., Cashy J., and Holzner B. Giving meaning to measure: linking self-reported fatigue and function to performance of everyday activities. J Pain Symptom Manage 31 (2006) 229-241
41. Tinetti M.E. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 34 (1986) 119-126
42. Podsiadlo D., and Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39 (1991) 142-148