Editorial: Roles and rewards of journal peer reviewers

Japan Journal of Nursing Science

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 67-69

  Izumi, Shigeko ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; METHODOLOGY; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLICATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; NURSE'S ROLE; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 70949096840     PISSN: 17427932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2009.00132.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Gennaro, S. (2008). Viewing and reviewing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40, 299.
2. Henly, S. J. Dougherty, M. C. (2009). Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research. Nursing Outlook, 57, 18 26.
3. Holzemer, W. L. (2009). Strategies for serving as a peer reviewer for a refereed journal: Providing constructive criticism. Paper presented at the Japan Journal of Nursing Science Seminar; 13 Jun 2009, Tokyo, Japan.
4. Kearney, M., Baggs, J., Broome, M., Dougherty, M. Freda, M. (2008). Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40, 395 400.