Meta-analysis

Communication Monographs

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 398-407

  Allen, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949084561     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: 14795787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637750903310386     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, M. (1989). A comparison of self report, observer, and physiological assessments of public speaking anxiety reduction techniques using meta-analysis. Communication Studies, 40, 127-139.
2. Allen, M. (2002). A synthesis and extension of constructivist comforting research. In M. Allen, R. Preiss, B. Gayle, & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 227-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Allen, M., & Preiss, R. (1998). Evaluating the advice offered by the tool users. In M. Allen & R. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 243256). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
4. Allen, M., & Preiss, R. (2002). An analysis of textbooks in interpersonal communication: How accurate are the representations? In M. Allen, R. Preiss, B. Gayle, & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 371-388). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Allen, M., & Preiss, R. (2006). What to do in the classroom? Evaluating the advice. In B. Gayle, R. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen, M. (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 405-422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Allen, M., Preiss, R., & Burrell, N. (2007). The challenge of media effects for teaching and policy. In R. Preiss, B. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant, J. (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 489-504). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Allen, M., & Stiff, J. (1998). An analysis of the sleeper effect. In M. Allen & R. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 175-188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
8. Benoit, W. (1998). Forewarning and persuasion. In M. Allen & R. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
9. Casey, M., Allen, M., Emmers-Sommer, T., Sahlstein, E., DeGooyer, D., Winters, A., et al. (2003). When a celebrity contracts a disease: The example of Earvin "Magic" Johnson's announcement that he was HIV positive. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 249-266.
10. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (pB.05). The American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
11. Cook, T. D., Cooper, H., Cordray, D. S., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L. V., Light, R. J., et al. (1992). Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
14. Emmers-Sommer, T., & Allen, M. (1999). Variables related to sexual coercion: A path model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 659-678.
15. Fink, A. (2009). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Hamilton, M. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The effect of language intensity on receiver evaluation of message, source, and topic. In M. Allen & R. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 99-138). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
19. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Kim, M., & Hunter, J. E. (1993a). Attitude-behavior relations: A meta-analysis of attitudinal relevance and topic. Journal of Communication, 43, 101-142.
23. Kim, M., & Hunter, J. E. (1993b). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior. Communication Research, 20, 331-364.
24. Levine, T. R., Weber, R., Hullett, C., Park, H. S., & Lindsey, L. L. M. (2008). A critical assessment of hull hypothesis significance testing in quantitative communication research. Human Communication Research, 34, 171-187.
25. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Meehl, P. E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Muliak, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 393-425). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Petitti, D. B. (2000). Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Rosenthal, R. (1987). Judgment studies: Design, analysis, and meta-analysis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. L. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Stiff, J. B. (1986). Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta-analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes. Communication Monographs, 53, 75-89.
32. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 591-615.