Semen molecular and cellular features: These parameters can reliably predict subsequent ART outcome in a goat model

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages 125-

  Berlinguer, Fiammetta ^a   Madeddu, Manuela ^a   Pasciu, Valeria ^a   Succu, Sara ^a   Spezzigu, Antonio ^a   Satta, Valentina ^a   Mereu, Paolo ^a   Leoni, Giovanni G ^a   Naitana, Salvatore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIVISION; CELL LEVEL; CELL VIABILITY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA INTEGRATION; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FREEZE THAWING; GOAT; MALE; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CRYOPRESERVATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GOATS; INFERTILITY; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SEMEN; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEMEN PRESERVATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CAPRA HIRCUS;

EID: 70749099494     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777827     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-125     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Garrido N, Remohí J, Martínez-Conejero JA, García-Herrero S, Pellicer A, Meseguer M. Contribution of sperm molecular features to embryo quality and assisted reproduction success. Reprod Biomed Online 2008, 17:855-865.
2. Rodriguez-Martinez H, Barth AD. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality related to in vivo function and fertility. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 2007, 64:39-54.
3. Miki K. Energy metabolism and sperm function. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 2007, 65:309-325.
4. Silva PF, Gadella BM. Detection of damage in mammalian sperm cells. Theriogenology 2006, 65:958-978.
5. Travis AJ, Jorgez CJ, Merdiushev T, Jones BH, Dess DM, Diaz-Cueto L, Storey BT, Kopf GS, Moss SB. Functional relationships between capacitation-dependent cell signaling and compartmentalized metabolic pathways in murine spermatozoa. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:7630-7636.
6. Visconti PE, Bailey JL, Moore GD, Pan D, Olds-Clarke P, Kopf GS. Capacitation of mouse spermatozoa. I. Correlation between the capacitation state and protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Development 1995, 121:1129-1137.
7. Mukai C, Okuno M. Glycolysis plays a major role for adenosine triphosphate supplementation in mouse sperm flagellar movement. Biol Reprod 2004, 71:540-547.
8. Garrett LJ, Revell SG, Leese HJ. Adenosine triphosphate production by bovine spermatozoa and its relationship to semen fertilizing ability. J Androl 2008, 29:449-458.
9. Madeddu M, Berlinguer F, Ledda M, Leoni GG, Satta V, Succu S, Rotta A, Pasciu V, Zinellu A, Muzzeddu M, Carru C, Naitana S. Ejaculate collection efficiency and post-thaw semen quality in wild-caught Griffon vultures from the Sardinian population. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009, 19:7-18.
10. Kirk ES, Squires EL, Graham JK. Comparison of in vitro laboratory analyses with the fertility of cryopreserved stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2005, 64:1422-1439.
11. Mocé E, Graham JK. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci 2008, 105:104-118.
12. Marcus-Braun N, Braun G, Potashnik G, Har-Vardi I. Effect of cryopreservation on quality and fertilization capacity of human sperm. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004, 116:63-66.
13. Freeman MR, Archibong AE, Mrotek JJ, Whitworth CM, Weitzman GA, Hill GA. Male partner screening before in vitro fertilization: preselecting patients who require intracytoplasmic sperm injection with the sperm penetration assay. Fertil Steril 2001, 76:1113-1118.
14. Strassburger D, Friedler S, Raziel A, Schachter M, Kasterstein E, Ron-el R. Very low sperm count affects the result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000, 17:431-436.
15. Mortimer ST. CASA-practical aspects. J Androl 2000, 21:515-524.
16. Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HD, Reed HC, Curnock RM. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J Androl 1997, 18:312-323.
17. Foote RH. Fertility estimation: a review of past experience and future prospects. Anim Reprod Sci 2003, 75:119-139.
18. Wilhelm KM, Graham JK, Squires EL. Comparison of the fertility of cryopreserved stallion spermatozoa with sperm motion analyses, flow cytometric evaluation, and zona-free hamster oocyte penetration. Theriogenology 1996, 46:559-578.
19. Farrell PB, Presicce GA, Brockett CC, Foote RH. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology 1998, 49:871-879.
20. Bilodeau JF, Chatterjee S, Sirard MA, Gagnon C. Levels of antioxidant defenses are decreased in bovine spermatozoa after a cycle of freezing and thawing. Mol Reprod Dev 2000, 55:282-288.
21. Januskauskas A, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenology 2003, 60:743-758.
22. Madrid-Bury N, Pérez-Gutiérrez JF, Pérez-Garnelo S, Moreira P, Pintado Sanjuanbenito B, Gutiérrez-Adán A, de la Fuente Martínez J. Relationship between non-return rate and chromatin condensation of deep frozen bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2005, 64:232-241.
23. Leboeuf B, Restall B, Salamon S. Production and storage of goat semen for artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 2000, 62:113-141.
24. Pintado B, de la Fuente J, Roldan ER. Permeability of boar and bull spermatozoa to the nucleic acid stains propidium iodide or Hoechst 3 or to eosin: accuracy in the assessment of cell viability. J Reprod Fertil 3258, 118:145-152.
25. Zinellu A, Sotgia S, Pasciu V, Madeddu M, Leoni GG, Naitana S, Deiana L, Carru C. Intracellular adenosine 5'-triphosphate, adenosine 5'-diphosphate, and adenosine 5'-monophosphate detection by short-end injection capillary electrophoresis using methylcellulose as the effective electroosmostic flow suppressor. Electrophoresis 2008, 29:3069-3073.
26. Balestri F, Giannecchini M, Sgarrella F, Carta MC, Tozzi MG, Camici M. Purine and pyrimidine nucleosides preserve human astrocytoma cell adenylate energy charge under ischemic conditions. Neurochem Int 2007, 50:517-523.
27. Lewis SE, Agbaje IM. Using the alkaline comet assay in prognostic tests for male infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Mutagenesis 2008, 23:163-170.
28. Sakkas D, Moffatt O, Manicardi GC, Mariethoz E, Tarozzi N, Bizzarro D. Nature of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa and the possibile involvement of apoptosis. Biol Reprod 2002, 66:1061-1067.
29. Olive PL, Durand RE, Banath JP, Johnston PJ. Analysis of DNA damage in individual cells. Methods Cell Biol 2001, 64:235-249.
30. Rosenkrans C, Zeng G, Mcnamara G, Schoff PK, First NL. Development of bovine embryos in vitro as affected by energy substrates. Biol Reprod 1993, 49:459-462.
31. Palomo MJ, Izquierdo D, Mogas T, Paramio MT. Effect of semen preparation on IVF of prepubertal goat oocytes. Theriogenology 1999, 51:927-40.
32. Eid LN, Lorton SP, Parrish JJ. Paternal influence on S-phase in the first cell cycle of the bovine embryo. Biol Reprod 1994, 51:1232-1237.
33. Larsson B, Rodríguez-Martínez H. Can we use in vitro fertilization tests to predict semen fertility?. Anim Reprod Sci 2000, 60-61:327-336.
34. Sellés E, Gadea J, Romar R, Matás C, Ruiz S. Analysis of in vitro fertilizing capacity to evaluate the freezing procedures of boar semen and to predict the subsequent fertility. Reprod Domest Anim 2003, 38:66-72.
35. Zhang BR, Larsson B, Lundeheim N, Håård MG, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Prediction of bull fertility by combined in vitro assessments of frozen-thawed semen from young dairy bulls entering an AI-programme. Int J Androl 1999, 22:253-260.
36. Van Loon AA, Den Boer PJ, Schans GP, Mackenbach P, Grootegoed JA, Baan RA, Lohman PH. Immunochemical detection of DNA damage induction and repair at different cellular stages of spermatogenesis of the hamster after in vitro or in vivo exposure to ionizing radiation. Exp Cell Res 1991, 193:303-309.
37. Aitken RJ, Koopman P, Lewis SE. Seeds of concern. Nature 2004, 432:48-52.
38. Hammadeh ME, Askari AS, Georg T, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W. Effect of freeze-thawing procedure on chromatin stability, morphological alteration and membrane integrity of human spermatozoa in fertile and subfertile men. Int J Androl 1999, 22:155-162.
39. Donnelly ET, McClure N, Lewis SE. Cryopreservation of human semen and prepared sperm: effects on motility parameters and DNA integrity. Fertil Steril 2001, 76:892-900.
40. Donnelly ET, Steele EK, McClure N, Lewis SE. Assessment of DNA integrity and morphology of ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men before and after cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2001, 16:1191-1199.
41. Bordignon V, Smith LC. Ultraviolet-irradiated spermatozoa activate oocytes but arrest preimplantation development after fertilization and nuclear transplantation in cattle. Biol Reprod 1999, 61:1513-1520.
42. Fatehi AN, Bevers MM, Schoevers E, Roelen BAJ, Colenbrander B, Gadella BM. DNA damage in bovine sperm cells does not block fertilization but induces apoptosis after the first cleavages. J Androl 2006, 27:176-188.
43. Tesarik J, Greco E, Mendoza C. Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 2004, 19:611-615.
44. Sakkas D, Urner F, Bizzaro D, Manicardi G, Bianchi PG, Shoukir Y, Campana A. Sperm nuclear DNA damage and altered chromatin structure: effect on fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 1998, 13:11-19.
45. Morris ID, Ilott S, Dixon L, Brison DR. The spectrum of DNA damage in human sperm assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) and its relationship to fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod 2002, 17:990-998.
46. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Developmental capacity of damaged spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1999, 14:2279-2285.
47. Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1997, 56:602-607.
48. Erenpreiss J, Bungum M, Spano M, Elzanaty S, Orbidans J, Giwercman A. Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications. Hum Reprod 2006, 21:2061-2064.
49. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nada EA, El-Tonsy MH, Sharma RK, Meyer A, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ. Negative effects of increased sperm DNA damage in relation to seminal oxidative stress in men with idiopathic and male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 2003, 79:1597-1605.
50. Garrido N, Meseguer M, Remohí J, Simón C, Pellicer A. Semen characteristics in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and hepatitis C (HCV)-seropositive males: predictors of the success of viral removal after sperm washing. Hum Reprod 2005, 20:1028-1034.
51. Bungum M, Spanò M, Humaidan P, Eleuteri P, Rescia M, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART. Hum Reprod 2008, 23:4-10.
52. Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, Erenpreiss J, Giwercman A. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:174-179.
53. Thurston LM, Watson PF, Holt WV. Semen cryopreservation: a genetic explanation for species and individual variation?. Cryo Letters 2002, 23:255-262.
54. Parinaud J, Richoilley G, Moutaffian H, Vieitez G, Mieusset R. Are the characteristics of spermatozoa in the insemination medium useful for predicting in-vitro fertilization results?. Int J Androl 1996, 19:103-108.
55. De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Koppers B, Nieschlag E. Diagnostic accuracy of computer-assisted sperm motion analysis. Hum Reprod 1998, 13:2512-2520.
56. Donnelly ET, Lewis SE, McNally JA, Thompson W. In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. Fertil Steril 1998, 70:305-314.
57. Amelar RD, Dubin L, Schoenfeld C. Sperm motility. Fertil Steril 1980, 34:197-215.
58. Liu DY, Clarke GN, Baker HW. Relationship between sperm motility assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyzer and fertilization rates in vitro. J Androl 1991, 12:231-239.
59. Aitken J. On the future of the hamster oocyte penetration assay. Fertil Steril 1994, 62:17-19.
60. Ford WC, Williams KM, Harrison S, Rees JM, Ray BD, McLaughlin EA, Hull MG. Value of the hamster oocyte test and computerised measurements of sperm motility in predicting if four or more viable embryos will be obtained in an IVF cycle. Int J Androl 2001, 24:109-119.