Assessment of differences between the modified Cincinnati and International Knee Documentation Committee patient outcome scores: A prospective Study

American Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2151-2157

  Agel, Julie ^a   Laprade, Robert F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex knee disorders; International knee documentation committee (ikdc) subjective questionnaire; Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System questionnaire; Outcome scores

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL KNEE DOCUMENTATION COMMITTEE RATING SCALE; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED CINCINNATI KNEE RATING SYSTEM; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE INJURIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70649112999     PISSN: 03635465     EISSN: 15523365     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0363546509337698     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Agel J, Swiontkowski M. Guide to outcomes instruments for musculoskeletal trauma research. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20 (8 Suppl) : S1-S146.
2. Arthur A, LaPrade R F, Agel J. Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy as the initial treatment for chronic posterolateral corner deficiency in the varus knee: a prospective clinical study. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1844-1850.
3. Barei D P, Agel J, Swiontkowski M F. Current utilization, interpretation, and recommendations: the musculoskeletal function assessments (MFA/SMFA). J Orthop Trauma. 2007; 21: 738-742.
4. Brozek JL, Guyatt GH, Heels-Ansdell D, et al. Specific HRQL instruments and symptom scores were more responsive than preferencebased generic instruments in patients with GERD. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62 (1) : 102-110.
5. Irrgang JJ, Anderson A F, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 600-613.
6. Irrgang JJ, Anderson A F, Boland AL, et al. International Knee Documentation Committee: responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee subject knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1567-1573.
7. Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability: the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26: 764-772.
8. L'Insalata JC, Warren R F, Cohen SB, Altchek DW, Peterson MG. A selfadministered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 738-748.
9. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990; 28: 632-642.
10. Marx RG, Jones EC, Allen AA, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 1459-1469.
11. Mohtadi N. Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26: 350-359.
12. Noyes FR, ed. The Cincinnati Knee Rating System. Cincinnati, OH: Cincinnati SportsMedicine Research and Education Foundation; 1983.
13. Noyes FR, Matthews DS, Mooar P, Grood E. The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part II: the results of rehabilitation, activity modification, and counseling on functional disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 163-174. (Pubitemid 13142113)
14. Noyes FR, Mooar P, Matthews DS, Butler DE. The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part I: the long-term functional disability in athletically active individuals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 154-162. (Pubitemid 13142112)
15. Paradowski PT, Englund M, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Similar group mean scores, but large individual variations, in patient-relevant outcomes over 2 years in meniscectomized subjects with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2: 38.
16. Risberg MA, Holm I, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L. Neuromuscular training versus strength training during first 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 737-750.
17. Risberg MA, Holm I, Tjomsland O, Ljunggren E, Ekeland A. Prospective study of changes in impairments and disabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999; 29: 400-412. (Pubitemid 29315975)
18. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, Lohmander LS. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) : validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998; 8: 439-448. (Pubitemid 128531478)
19. Shapiro ET, Richmond JC, Rockett SE, McGrath MM, Donaldson WR. The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 196-200.
20. Siebold R, Buelow JU, Bos L, Ellermann A. Primary ACL reconstruction with fresh-frozen patellar versus Achilles tendon allografts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123: 180-185.
21. Suh M, Hanson B P, Norvell DC, Helfet DL. AO Handbook of Musculoskeletal Outcomes Measures and Instruments. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2005.