Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support Devices

Cardiology Clinics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 169-184

  Sarkar, Kunal ^a   Kini, Annapoorna S ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

IABP; IMELLA; Left ventricular; TandemHeart

Indexed keywords

CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA ANALYSIS; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; REVIEW; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; SYSTOLIC DYSFUNCTION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

CARDIAC OUTPUT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMPING; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 70649104685     PISSN: 07338651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2009.09.007     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Ellis S.G., Tamai H., Nobuyoshi M., et al. Contemporary percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary stenoses: initial results from a multicenter registry analysis 1994-1996. Circulation 96 11 (1997) 3867-3872
2. Kosuga K., Tamai H., Ueda K., et al. Initial and long-term results of angioplasty in unprotected left main coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 83 1 (1999) 32-37
3. Valgimigli M., Malagutti P., Aoki J., et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the percutaneous treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a combined RESEARCH and T-SEARCH long-term analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 3 (2006) 507-514
4. Kar B., Adkins L.E., Civitello A.B., et al. Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device. Tex Heart Inst J 33 2 (2006) 111-115
5. Kar B., Butkevich A., Civitello A.B., et al. Hemodynamic support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device during stenting of an unprotected left main coronary artery. Tex Heart Inst J 31 1 (2004) 84-86
6. Hamon M., Rasmussen L.H., Manoukian S.V., et al. Choice of arterial access site and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy: the ACUITY trial. EuroIntervention 5 1 (2009) 115-120
7. Mehran R., Lansky A.J., Witzenbichler B., et al. Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (2009) [Epub ahead of print]
8. Babaev A., Frederick P.D., Pasta D.J., et al. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 294 4 (2005) 448-454
9. Laschinger J.C., Cunningham Jr. J.N., Catinella FP., et al. 'Pulsatile' left atrial-femoral artery bypass. A new method of preventing extension of myocardial infarction. Arch Surg 118 8 (1983) 965-969
10. Laschinger J.C., Grossi E.A., Cunningham Jr. J.N., et al. Adjunctive left ventricular unloading during myocardial reperfusion plays a major role in minimizing myocardial infarct size. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 90 1 (1985) 80-85
11. Catinella F.P., Cunningham Jr. J.N., Glassman E., et al. Left atrium-to-femoral artery bypass: effectiveness in reduction of acute experimental myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86 6 (1983) 887-896
12. Chen J.M., DeRose JJ., Slater J.P., et al. Improved survival rates support left ventricular assist device implantation early after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 33 7 (1999) 1903-1908
13. Vogel R.A., Shawl F., Tommaso C., et al. Initial report of the National Registry of Elective Cardiopulmonary Bypass Supported Coronary Angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 15 1 (1990) 23-29
14. Shawl F.A., Domanski M.J., Wish M.H., et al. Percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass support in the catheterization laboratory: technique and complications. Am Heart J 120 1 (1990) 195-203
15. Scholz K.H., Dubois-Rande J.L., Urban P., et al. Clinical experience with the percutaneous hemopump during high-risk coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 82 9 (1998) 1107-1110 A6
16. Scholz K.H., Tebbe U., Chemnitius M., et al. Transfemoral placement of the left ventricular assist device "Hemopump" during mechanical resuscitation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 38 2 (1990) 69-72
17. Kantrowitz A., Tjonneland S., Freed P.S., et al. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA 203 2 (1968) 113-118
18. Cohen M., Urban P., Christenson J.T., et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in US and non-US centres: results of the Benchmark Registry. Eur Heart J 24 19 (2003) 1763-1770
19. Moulopoulos S.D., Kwan-Gett C.S., Collan R., et al. Intra-aortic balloon pumping. Effect in sheep with a ligated coronary artery. Minn Med 53 3 (1970) 261-265
20. Nanas J.N., Nanas S.N., Charitos C.E., et al. Hemodynamic effects of a counterpulsation device implanted on the ascending aorta in severe cardiogenic shock. ASAIO Trans 34 3 (1988) 229-234
21. Sjauw K.D., Engström A.E., Vis M.M., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?. Eur Heart J 30 4 (2009) 459-468
22. Thiele H., Lauer B., Hambrecht R., et al. Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation 104 24 (2001) 2917-2922
23. Fonger J.D., Zhou Y., Matsuura H., et al. Enhanced preservation of acutely ischemic myocardium with transseptal left ventricular assist. Ann Thorac Surg 57 3 (1994) 570-575
24. Rajdev S., Krishnan P., Irani A., et al. Clinical application of prophylactic percutaneous left ventricular assist device (TandemHeart) in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention using an arterial preclosure technique: single-center experience. J Invasive Cardiol 20 2 (2008) 67-72
25. Rajdev S., Benza R., Misra V., et al. Use of TandemHeart as a temporary hemodynamic support option for severe pulmonary artery hypertension complicated by cardiogenic shock. J Invasive Cardiol 19 8 (2007) E226-E229
26. Meyns B., Stolinski J., Leunens V., et al. Left ventricular support by catheter-mounted axial flow pump reduces infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 7 (2003) 1087-1095
27. Meyns B., Dens J., Sergeant P., et al. Initial experiences with the Impella device in patients with cardiogenic shock-Impella support for cardiogenic shock. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 51 6 (2003) 312-317
28. Reesink K.D., Dekker A.L., Van Ommen V., et al. Miniature intracardiac assist device provides more effective cardiac unloading and circulatory support during severe left heart failure than intraaortic balloon pumping. Chest 126 3 (2004) 896-902
29. Valgimigli M., Steendijk P., Sianos G., et al. Left ventricular unloading and concomitant total cardiac output increase by the use of percutaneous Impella Recover LP 2.5 assist device during high-risk coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65 2 (2005) 263-267
30. Cheng J.M., den Uil C.A., Hoeks S.E., et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J 30 17 (2009) 2102-2108
31. Reitan O., Ohlin H., Peterzén B., et al. Initial tests with a new cardiac assist device. ASAIO J 45 4 (1999) 317-321
32. Reitan O., Steen S., and Ohlin H. Hemodynamic effects of a new percutaneous circulatory support device in a left ventricular failure model. ASAIO J 49 6 (2003) 731-736
33. Dixon S.R., Henriques J.P., Mauri L., et al. A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2 2 (2009) 91-96
34. Seyfarth M., Sibbing D., Bauer I., et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 52 19 (2008) 1584-1588