The impact of local supporters on smart growth policy adoption

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 281-291

  O'Connell, Lenahan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehensive planning; Environmental activism; Growth regulation; Local politics; Smart growth

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTALISM; INNER CITY AREA; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLITICAL INTEGRATION; REDEVELOPMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; URBAN GROWTH;

EID: 70549102176     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360902885495     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Planning Association. (2002). Policy guide on smart growth. Retrieved September 5, 2007, from http://www.planning.org/policy/ guides/adopted/smartgrowth.htm
2. Babcock, R., & Bosselman, F. (1973). Exclusionary zoning: Land use regulation and housing in the 1970s. New York: Praeger.
3. Baldassare, M., & Protash, W. (1982). Growth controls, population growth and community satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 47(3), 339-346.
4. Baldassare, M., & Wilson, G. (1996). Changing sources of suburban support for local growth controls. Urban Studies, 33(12), 459-471.
5. Barkan, S. E. (2004). Explaining public support for the environmental movement: A civic voluntarism model. Social Science Quarterly, 85(4), 913-937.
6. Bogart, W. (1993). "What big teeth you have!" Identifying the motivations for exclusionary zoning. Urban Studies, 30(10), 1669-1681.
7. Bridgeland, W. M., & Sofranko, A. (1975). Community structure and issue-specific influences: Community mobilization over environmental quality. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 11(2), 186-214.
8. Burby, R., & May, P. (1997). Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Calthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. (2001). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press
10. Carruthers, J. I. (2002). The impacts of state growth management programmes: A comparative analysis. Urban Studies, 39(11), 1959-1982.
11. Cervero, R. (2006). Alternative approaches to modeling the traveldemand impacts of smart growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 285-295.
12. Chapin, T. S., & Connerly, C. E. (2004). Attitudes toward growth management in Florida: Comparing resident support in 1985 and 2001. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 443-452.
13. Checkoway, B. (1986). Political strategy for social planning. In B. Checkoway (Ed.), Strategic perspective on planning practice (pp. 195-214). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
14. Clark, T. N. (1994). Race and class versus the new political culture. In T.N. Clark (Ed.), Urban innovations: Creative strategies for turbulent times (pp. 21-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Clark, T. N., & Goetz. E. (1994). The antigrowth machine: Can city governments control, limit, or manage growth? In T. N. Clark (Ed.), Urban innovations: Creative strategies for turbulent times (pp. 105-145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Clark, T. N. & Inglehart, R. (1998). The new political culture: Changing dynamics of support for the welfare state and other policies in postindustrial societies. In T. N. Clark, V. Hoffman-Martinot, & M. Gromala (Eds.). The new political culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17. Danielson, M. (1976). The politics of exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Dawkins, C. J., & Nelson, A. C. (2003). State growth management programs and central-city revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 381-396.
19. Dilman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
20. Donovan, T., & Neiman, M. (1992). Citizen mobilization and the adoption of suburban growth controls. Western Political Quarterly, 45(4), 651-675.
21. Downs, A. (2005). Smart growth: Why we discuss it more than we do it. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(4), 367-378.
22. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck J. (2000). Suburban nation. New York: North Point Press.
23. Feagin, J. R., & Parker R. (1990). Building American cities: The urban real estate game. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Forrester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Gillham, O. (2002). The limitless city. Washington, DC: Island Press.
26. Glickfeld, M., & Levine, N. (1992). Regional growth ... Local reaction. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
27. Green, G., & Fleischmann, A. (1991). Promoting economic development: A comparison of central cities, suburbs and nonmetropolitan communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 27(2), 145-154.
28. Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
29. Ihlanfeldt, K. (2004). Introduction: Exclusionary land-use regulations. Urban Studies, 41(2), 255-259.
30. Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science and Politics, 63(2), 57-72.
31. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460-472.
33. Judd, D. R., & Swanstrom, T. (1998). City politics: Private power and public policy. New York: Longman.
34. Knaap, G. (1985). The price effects of urban growth boundaries in metropolitan Portland, Oregon. Land Economics, 61(1), 26-35.
35. Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Logan, J., & Zhou, M. (1990). The adoption of growth controls in suburban communities. Social Science Quarterly, 71(1), 118-129.
37. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Lucy, W., & Phillips, D. (2006). Tomorrow's cities, tomorrow's suburbs. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
39. McDonald, D., & McMillan, D. (2004). Determinants of suburban development controls: A Fischel expedition. Urban Studies, 41 (2), 341-361
40. Nelson, A. C., Burby R., Feser, E., Dawkins, C., Malizia, E., & Quercia, R. (2004). Urban containment and central-city revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 411-424.
41. Nelson, A. C., Dawkins, C., & Sanchez, S. (2004). Urban containment and residential segregation: A preliminary investigation. Urban Studies, 41(2), 423-439.
42. Orfield, M. (1998). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
43. Pendall, R. (2000). Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66 (2), 125-142.
44. Portney, K. (2005). Civic engagement and sustainable cities in the United States. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 579-591.
45. Princtl, S. (1994). The regional management of growth in California: A history of failure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(2), 256-274.
46. Protash, W., & Baldassare, M. (1983). Growth policies and community status: A test and modification of Logan's theory. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18(3), 397-412.
47. Purcell, M. (2000). The decline of the political consensus for urban growth; Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(1), 85-100.
48. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
49. Rosenbaum, N. (1978). Growth and its discontents: Origins of local population controls. In J. May & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), The policy cycle (pp. 43-61). London: Sage.
50. Rusk, D. (1999). Inside game/outside game: Winning strategies for saving urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
51. Staley, S. (1999). The sprawling of America: In defense of the American city. Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
52. Steel, B., & Lovrich, N. (2000). Growth management policy and county government: Correlates of policy adoption across the United States. State and Local Government Review, 32(1), 7-19.
53. Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
54. U.S. Census Bureau. (1994a). County and city data book: 1994 Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
55. U.S. Census Bureau. (1994b). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1994 (114th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
56. U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2007 (127th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service. (2000). Summary report: 1997 national resources inventory Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
58. U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Resource Conservation Service (2003). National resources inventory 2003. Retrieved March 2, 2009, from www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/nri/2003/ nri03landuse-mrb.html
59. Warner, K., & Molotch H. (1995). Power to build: How development persists despite local limits. Urban Affairs Review, 30(3), 378-406
60. Wassmer, R., & Lascher, E. (2006). Who supports local growth and regional planning to deal with its consequences? Urban Affairs Review, 41(5), 621-645.