Evolution of visual performance in 250 eyes implanted with Tecnis ZM900 multifocal IOL

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 762-768

  Bautista, Carlos Palomino ^a   González, David Carmona ^a   Gómez, Alfredo Castillo ^a   Bescos, José Angel Cristóbal ^b  

^a Neurology Service   (Spain)

^b Lozano Blesa Hospital   (Spain)

Author keywords

Diffractive optic; Multifocal intraocular lens; Neuroadaptation; Tecnis ZM900

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONOCULAR VISION; NEAR VISUAL ACUITY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOPIC VISION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; REFRACTION ERROR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATARACT; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSEUDOPHAKIA; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 70549099826     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210901900513     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemsen D. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res 1983; 23: 689-99.
2. Guirao A, Redondo M, Artal P. Optical aberrations of the human cornea as a function of age. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2000; 17: 1697-702.
3. Glasser A, Campbell MC. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res 1998; 38: 209-29.
4. Alió JL, Schimchak P, Negri HP, et al. Crystalline lens optical dysfunction through aging. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 2022-9.
5. Kershner RM. Retinal image contrast and functional visual performance with spheric, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses. Prospective evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1684-94.
6. Mester U, Dillinger P, Anterist N. Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 652-60.
7. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, et al. Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 986-92.
8. Ricci F, Scuderi G, Missiroli F, et al. Low contrast visual acuity in pseudophakic patients implanted with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004; 82: 718-22.
9. Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L, et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: a multicenter randomized study [erratum 2005; 31: 1857]. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 712-7.
10. Denoyer A, Le Lez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: effect of contrast sensitivity and wave-front aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 210-6.
11. Bellucci R, Morselli S, Pucci V. Spherical aberration and coma with an aspherical and a spherical intraocular lens in normal age-matched eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 203.
12. Cillino S, Casuccio A, Pace FD, et al. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology Epub 2008 Jun 4.
13. Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB, Röhrig B, Grolmus R. Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 2015-21.
14. Mester U, Hunold W, Wesendahl T, Kaymak H. Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1033-40.
15. Toto L, Falconio G, Vecchiarino L, et al. Visual performance and biocompatibility of 2 multifocal diffractive IOLs: six-month comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1419-25.
16. Goes FJ. Refractive lens exchange with the diffractive multifocal Tecnis ZM900 intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 243-50.
17. Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1464-73.
18. Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Baamonde MB, Montés-Micó R. Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 430-8.
19. Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB, Röhrig B, Grolmus R. Intermediate vision and reading speed with array, Tecnis, and ReSTOR intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 251-6.
20. Alió JL, Tavolato M, De la Hoz F, Claramonte P, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Galal A. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffracfive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 2494-503.
21. Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, et al. Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 827-32.
22. Kaymak H, Fahle M, Ott G, Mester U. Intraindividual comparison of the effect of training on visual performance with ReSTOR and Tecnis diffractive multifocal IOLs. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 287-93.
23. Tan DT, Fong A. Efficacy of neural vision therapy to enhance contrast sensitivity function and visual acuity in low myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 570-7.
24. Mäntyjärvi M, Laitinen T. Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 261-6.
25. Martínez Palmer A, Gómez Faiña P, España Albelda A, Comas Serrano M, Nahra Saad D, Castilla Céspedes M. Visual function with bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: 257-64.