Overt attentional prioritization of new objects and feature changes during real-world scene viewing

Visual Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 6-7, 2009, Pages 835-855

  Matsukura, Michi ^a   Brockmole, James R ^a   Henderson, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Gaze control; Oculomotor capture; Real world scenes; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; OCULOMOTOR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL SALIENCE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 70549095129     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280902868660     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aivar, M. P., Hayhoe, M. M., Chizk, C. L., & Mruczek, R. E. B. (2005). Spatial memory and saccadic targeting in a natural task. Journal of Vision, 5, 177-193.
2. Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 62-70.
3. Boot, W. R., Brockmole, J. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005a). Attention capture is modulated in dual-task situations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 662-668.
4. Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2005b). Oculomotor consequences of abrupt object onsets and offsets: Onsets dominate oculomotor capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 910-928.
5. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2005a). Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1061-1067.
6. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2005b). Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 857-868.
7. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object-scene consistency. Visual Cognition, 16, 375-390.
8. Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cueing. Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 1366-1378.
10. Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2007). Can the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual saliency in scene perception? Perception, 36, 1123-1138.
11. Gibson, B. S., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search. Psychological Science, 9, 176-182.
12. Hayhoe, M. M., Shrivastava, A., Mruczek, R., & Pelz, J. B. (2003). Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task. Journal of Vision, 3, 49-63.
13. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during search in real-world scenes. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537-562). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
14. Henderson, J. M., & Castelhano, M. S. (2005). Eye movements and visual memory for scenes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 213-235). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance while reading and while watching dynamic scenes (pp. 269-293). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
16. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 5, 438-443.
17. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
18. Hollingworth, A. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 519-537.
19. Hollingworth, A. (2006). Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 781-807.
20. Hollingworth, A. (2007). Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 31-47.
21. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 213-235.
22. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
23. Hyun, J.-S., Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (in press). The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
24. Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M., Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons. Vision Research, 40, 1443-1458.
25. Itti, L., & Baldi, P. F. (in press). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research.
26. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
27. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
28. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural capacity. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
29. Land, M., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28, 1311-1328.
30. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 476-490.
31. Mackworth, N. H., & Morandi, A. J. (1967). The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 547-552.
32. Mitroff, S. R., & Alvarez, G. A. (2007). Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1199-1204.
33. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual selective attention. Vision Research, 42, 107-123.
34. Rauschenberger, R. (2003). Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 814-842.
35. Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 147-155.
36. Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D., & Merikle, P. M. (2000). Does unattended information facilitate change detection? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 480-487.
37. Tatler, B. W., Baddeley, R. J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2005). Visual correlates of eye movements: Effects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45, 643-659.
38. Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., & Land, M. F. (2005). Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: From fixations to object files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 58A, 931-960.
39. Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., & Rusted, J. (2003). The time course of abstract visual representation. Perception, 32, 579-592.
40. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
41. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1595-1608.
42. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
43. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
44. Walther, D., & Koch, C. (2006). Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks, 19, 1395-1407.
45. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676-681.
46. Yantis, S. (1998). Objects, attention, and perceptual experience. In R. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 187-214). New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 73-103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Yantis, S., & Gibson, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in motion perception and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182-204.
49. Yantis, S., & Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 95-107.
50. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt visual onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1505-1513.
51. Yarbus, A. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
52. Zelinsky, G. J. (2001). Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 209-225.