Repairs as the last orderly provided defense of safety in aviation

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 443-465

  Arminen, Ilkka ^a   Auvinen, Petra ^a   Palukka, Hannele ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Aviation safety; Conversation analysis; Ethnomethodology; Interaction; Intersubjectivity; Multimodality; Organization of repair

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450280604     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arminen I. Institutional interaction-studies of talk at work. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis vol. 2 (2005), Ashgate, Aldershot
2. Arminen I. Sequential order and sequence structure-the case of incommensurable studies on mobile phone calls. Discourse Studies 7 6 (2005) 649-662
3. Arminen I. On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction. Discourse & Society 11 4 (2000) 435-458
4. Auvinen P. Achievement of intersubjectivity in airline cockpit interaction (2009), University of Tampere Press, Tampere
5. Dekker S.W.A. The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error (2006), Ashgate, Aldershot, England
6. Dekker S.W.A. The Field Guide to Human-Error Investigations (2002), Ashgate, Aldershot, England
7. Dismukes K., and Nowinski J. Prospective Memory, Concurrent Task Management, and Pilot Error. In: Kramer A., Wiegmann D., and Kirlik A. (Eds). Attention: From Theory to Practice (2006), Oxford University Press, New York. http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/flightcognition/download/promem_concurrenttask.pdf [Electronic version] Retrieved 2 Mars, 2006 from http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/flightcognition/download/promem_concurrenttask.pdf
8. Drew P. "Open" class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28 (1997) 69-101
9. Garcia A.C., and Jacobs J.B. The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom. Qualitative Sociology 21 3 (1998) 299-317
10. Goodwin C. Practices of seeing visual analysis: an ethnomethodological approach. In: Van Leeuwen T., and Jewitt C. (Eds). Handbook of Visual Analysis (2001), Sage Publications, London 157-182
11. Goodwin C. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (2000) 1489-1522
12. Goodwin C. Transparent vision. In: Ochs E., Schegloff E.A., and Thompson S.A. (Eds). Interaction and Grammar (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 370-404
13. Goodwin C. Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science 25 (1995) 237-274
14. Goodwin C. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96 3 (1994) 606-633
15. Goodwin C., and Goodwin M.H. Seeing as situated activity: formulating planes. In: Engeström Y., and Middleton D. (Eds). Cognition, and Communication at Work (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 61-95
16. Harper, Richard, Randall, Dave, 1992. Rogues in the air: an ethnomethodology of 'conflict' in socially organised airspace. Technical Report EPC-1992-109. Rank Xerox Research Centre, Cambridge.
17. Harper R.H.R., Hughes J.A., and Shapiro D.Z. Working in harmony: an examination of computer technology in air traffic control. In: Bowers J.M., and Benford S.D. (Eds). Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design (1991), Elsevier, Amsterdam 225-234
18. ten Have P. Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology (2004), Sage, London
19. Heath C., and Luff P. Technology in Action (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. Heritage J. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (1984), Polity Press, Cambridge
21. Hopkin V.D. Human Factors in Air Traffic Control (1995), Taylor & Francis, London
22. Hutchins E. How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science 19 (1995) 265-288
23. Hutchby I., and Wooffitt R. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications (1998), Polity Press, Oxford
24. Jefferson G. On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In: Button G., and Lee J.R.E. (Eds). Talk and Social Organisation (1987), Multilingual Matters, Clevedon 87-100
25. Knorr-Cetina K., and Bruegger U. Global microstructures: the virtual societies of financial markets. American Journal of Sociology 107 4 (2002) 905-950
26. Koskela I., Arminen I., and Palukka H. Centers of coordination as nexus of mobile systems-a study of The Finnish Air Traffic Control. In: Haddington P., et al. (Ed). Being Mobile: Movement as Social Action (2010), Hampton Press
27. Laury R. On the development of the definite article se in Spoken Finnish. In: Vilkuna M., and Anttila A. (Eds). SKY 1991. Suomen kielitieteellisen yhdistyksen vuosikirja. The 1991 Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland. (1991), Suomen kielitieteellinen yhdistys, Helsinki 93-122
28. Leary W.M. The impact of instrument flying and radio navigation on U.S. Commercial Air Operations between the wars. In: Leary W.M. (Ed). From Airships to Airbus. The History of Civil and Commercial Aviation (1995), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
29. Loukopoulos L.D., Dismukes R.K., and Barshi I. Concurrent task demands in the cockpit: challenges and vulnerabilities in routine flight operations. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. The Wright State University, Dayton, OH (2003) 737-742. http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/flightcognition/Publications/LL_KD_IB_ISAP_03.pdf [Electronic version] Retrieved February 6, 2006 from http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/flightcognition/Publications/LL_KD_IB_ISAP_03.pdf
30. In: Luff P., Hindmarsh J., and Heath C. (Eds). Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. Nevile M. Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots. Discourse Studies 8 2 (2006) 279-302
32. Nevile M. Beyond the black box: talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (2004), Ashgate, Aldershot, UK
33. Nevile M. Integrity in the airline cockpit: embodying claims about progress for the conduct of an approach briefing. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2004) 447-480
34. Nevile M. Coordinating talk and non-talk activity in the airline cockpit. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 25 1 (2002) 131-146
35. Nevile M. Institutional talk-in-interaction: studies of teams in sociotechnical settings. Australian Language Matters 9 July/August/September (3) (2001)
36. Nevile M., and Walker M.B. A context for error: using conversation analysis to represent and analyse recorded voice data. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 5 2 (2005) 109-135
37. Norris S. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction-A Methodological Framework (2004), Routledge, London & NewYork
38. Palukka, Hannele, Auvinen, Petra, 2005. Ilmailuvuorovaikutus-lentäjien ja lennonjohtajien yhteistoiminnalliset työkäytänteet. [Interaction in aviation-collaborative working practices in air traffic control and airline cockpit] Research report. [Electronic version] Retrieved January 2, 2006 from http://www.etampere.fi/etre_old/ilmoittamis/pics/772.pdf.
39. Perrow C.B. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies (1984), Basic Books, New York
40. Reason J. Managing the Risk of Organizational Accidents (1997), Ashgate, Aldershot
41. Reason J. Human Error (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. Rochlin G.I. Trapped in the Net: The Unanticipated Consequences of Computerization (1997), Princeton University Press, New York
43. Schegloff E.A. Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97 5 (1992) 1295-1345
44. Schegloff E.A. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. Syntax and Semantics 12 (1979) 261-286
45. Schegloff E.A., Jefferson G., and Sacks H. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (1977) 361-382
46. Schulman R. The analysis of high reliability organizations: a comparative framework. In: Roberts K.H. (Ed). New Challenges to Understand Organizations (1993), Macmillan, New York
47. Schutz A. The Phenomenology of the Social World (1967), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL
48. Shappell S.A., and Wiegmann D.A. Applying reason: the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 1 1 (2001) 59-86
49. Shappell, S.A., Wiegmann, D.A., 2000. The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS). Report Number DOT/FAA/AM-00/7. Federal Aviation administration, Washington, DC. http://www.errorsolutions.com/images/journal_article1.pdf
50. Spagnolli A., Gamberini L., and Gasparini D. Situated breakdown analysis for the evaluation of a virtual environment. Psychonology Journal 1 1 (2002) 5-17. http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:n4fo_NnETgIJ:www.psychnology.org/File/ [Electronic version] Retrieved June 13, 2006 from http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:n4fo_NnETgIJ:www.psychnology.org/File/
51. Suchman L. Technologies of accountability: of lizards and aeroplanes. In: Button G. (Ed). Technology in Working Order (1993), Routledge, London 113-126
52. Suchman L. Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (1987), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
53. US Department of Transportation, 2001. Air carrier volumes and flight safety (airlines) in the US 1950-2000. Retrieved September 26, 2006 from http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/2001/html/table_02_09.html.
54. Weick K.E., and Roberts K.H. Collective minds in organizations: heedful interrelation on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (1993) 357-381
55. Wiegmann D.A., and Shappell S.A. Human error perspectives in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 11 4 (2001) 341-357
56. Young M.S., Shorrock S.T., and Faulkner J.P.E. Taste preferences of transport safety investigators: who doesn't like Swiss cheese?. In: Bust P.D., and McCasbe P.T. (Eds). Contemporary Ergonomics 2005 (2005), Taylor and Francis, London