Typological guidance in the acquisition of V2 Dutch

Lingua

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 264-283

  van Kampen, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Celtic; Germanic; Subject obligation; Typological hierarchy; Verb movement

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450273443     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bayer J. Decomposing the left periphery: dialectal and cross-linguistic evidence. In: Lohnstein H., and Trissler S. (Eds). The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery (2004), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 59-95
2. den Besten H. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In: Werner A. (Ed). On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania (1983), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 47-131
3. Blom, E., 2003. From Root Infinitive to Finite Sentence. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
4. Borsley R.D., and Morris Jones B. The development of finiteness in early Welsh. Journal of Celtic Language Learning 6 (2001) 9-20
5. Briscoe E.J. Grammatical acquisition: inductive bias and co-evolution of language and the language acquisition device. Language 76 2 (2000) 245-296
6. Bury D. Preverbal particles in verb-initial languages. In: Carnie A., Harley H., and Dooley S. (Eds). Verb-First (2005), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 135-154
7. Bury, this volume. Verb-second, particles, and flexible verb-initial orders
8. Chomsky N. Reflections on Language (1975), Pantheon, New York
9. Chomsky N. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36 1 (2005) 1-22
10. Clahsen H. Constraints on parameter setting. A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in erman child language. Language Acquisition 1 4 (1991) 361-391
11. Dresher B.E. Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1999) 27-67
12. Evers A. Verb second movement rules. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 26 (1981) 15-34
13. Evers A. Twee functionele principes voor de regel "Verschuif het werkwoord". GLOT (1982) 11-30
14. Evers, A., van Kampen, J., 2001. E-language, I-language and the order of parameter setting, Uil OTS Working Papers 00105-S-S, Utrecht.
15. Evers A., and van Kampen J. Parameter setting and input reduction. In: Biberauer T. (Ed). The Structure of Parametric Variation (2008), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
16. Fodor J.D. Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29 (1998) 1-36
17. de Haan G.J. A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch. In: de Haan G.J., and Zonneveld W. (Eds). Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar III (1987) 15-30
18. Haegeman L. Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures in Dutch. Language Acquisition 4 3 (1995) 205-255
19. Hoekstra T., and Hyams N. Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua 106 (1998) 81-112
20. Jakobson R. Kindersprache. Aphasie und Allgemeine Lautgesätze (1942), Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift, Uppsala
21. Jouitteau, M., 2005. La Syntaxe Comparée du Breton, Thèse de doctorat Université de Nantes.
22. van Kampen J. First Steps in Wh-movement (1997), Eburon, Delft
23. van Kampen J. Bootstraps at two for lexicon and discourse. Proceedings of ELA (Early Lexicon Acquisition). Lyon, December 5-8 (2001). http://www.let.uu.nl/∼Jacqueline.vanKampen/personal/downloadables.htm
24. Kampen J. The learnability of syntactic categories. In: van Kampen J., and Bauuw S. (Eds). Proceedings of GALA 2003 (2004) 245-256
25. Kampen J. The rise of predication by EPP. In: Brugos A., Micciulla L., and Smith Ch. (Eds). Proceedings of BUCLD 2003 (2004) 267-281
26. van Kampen J. Learnability order in the French pronominal system. In: Bok-Bennema R., Hollebrandse B., Kampers-Manhe B., and Sleeman P. (Eds). Selected Papers from Going Romance 2002 (2004), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 163-183
27. van Kampen J. Language-specific bootstraps for UG categories. International Journal of Bilingualism 9 2 (2005) 253-277
28. van Kampen J. The acquisition of the standard EPP in Dutch and French. In: Costa J., and Figueiredo Silva M.C. (Eds). Studies on Agreement (2006), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
29. van Kampen J. Early operators and late topic-drop/pro-drop. In: Torrens V., and Escobar L. (Eds). The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages (2006), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
30. van Kampen J. Relative agreement in Dutch. In: Los B., and van Koppen M. (Eds). Linguistics in the Netherlands (2007), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 112-125
31. Koeneman, O., 2000. The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
32. Koeneman, this volume. Verb movement in Germanic and Celtic languages: a flexible approach.
33. Koster J. Why subject sentences don't exist. In: Keyser S.J. (Ed). Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages (1978), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 53-64
34. Lebeaux, D., 1988. Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
35. MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd edition (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
36. McCloskey J. The morphosyntax of WH-extraction in Irish. Journal of Linguistics 37 (2001) 67-100
37. Migdalski, this volume. On the relation between V2 and the second position cliticization.
38. Mörnsjö, M., 2002. V1 Declaratives in Spoken Swedish. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
39. Radford A. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: the Nature of Early Child Grammars of English (1990), Basil Blackwell, Oxford
40. Rizzi. The fine structure of the left periphery. In: Haegeman L. (Ed). Elements of Grammar (1997), Kluwer, Dordrecht 281-337
41. Rouveret, this volume. On Verb-Subject languages.
42. Schütze C.T., and Wexler K. Subject case licensing and English root infinitives. Proceedings of the 20th Boston University Conference on Language Development (1996) 670-681
43. Watanabe A. The role of triggers in the extended split Infl hypothesis: Unlearnable parameter settings. Studia Linguistica 48 (1994) 156-178
44. Wechsler S. Verb second and illocutionary force. In: Leffel K., and Bouchard D. (Eds). Views on Phrase Structure (1991), Kluwer, Dordrecht 177-191
45. Weerman F. The V2 Conspiracy (1989), ICG Printing, Dordrecht
46. Weissenborn J. Functional categories and verb movement: the acquisition of German syntax reconsidered. In: Rothweiler (Ed). Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 3 Spracherwerb und Grammatik (1991), Westdeutscher Verlag, Göttingen 190-224
47. Wexler K. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106 (1998) 23-79
48. Wijnen F. Functionele categorieën in Nederlandse kindertaal. Nederlandse Taalkunde 3 (1997) 178-198
49. Yang C. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
50. Zwart, C.J.-W., 1993. Dutch Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.