Erratum: Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study (Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation DOI: 10.1007/s10926-006-9041-4);Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 93-106

  Holmgren, Kristina ^a   Ivanoff, Synneve Dahlin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Rehabilitation; Return to work; Sick leave; Social support; Supervisor perspective

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPLOYEE; EMPLOYER; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL LEAVE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORK RESUMPTION; WORKPLACE;

EID: 33847308618     PISSN: 10530487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-007-9080-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S. Women on sickness absence-views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26(4):213-222.
2. Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13(1):11-20.
3. Strunin L, Boden LI. Paths of reentry: Employment experiences of injured workers. Am J Ind Med 2000;38(4):373-384.
4. Riksförsäkringsverket. Socialförsäkring. Lagen om allmän försäkran och andra författningar (Social Insurance. The law of general insurance and other constitutions.): Riksförsä kringsverket, 2001. Report No.: AFL 22:3. (In Swedish.)
5. Heijbel B, Josephson M, Jensen I, Vingard E. Employer, insurance, and health system response to long-term sick leave in the public sector: Policy implications. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(2):167-176.
6. Arnetz BB, Sjogren B, Rydehn B, Meisel R. Early workplace intervention for employees with musculo skeletal related absenteeism: A prospective controlled intervention study. J Occup Environ Med 2003;45(5):499-506.
7. Burkhauser RV, Butler JS, Yang WK. The importance of employer accommodation on the job duration of workers with disabilities: A hazard model approach. Labour Economics 1995;2:109-130.
8. Dahlin Ivanoff S. Focus group discussions as a tool for developing a health education programme for elderly persons with visual impairment. Scan J Occup Ther 2002;9:3-9.
9. Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 1994;16:103-121.
10. Krueger RA. Quality control in focus group research. In: Morgan DL, ed. Successful focus groups. Advancing the state of the art. California: Sage Publication; 1993, pp. 65-85.
11. Kitzinger J, Barbour R. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In: Barbour R, Kitzinger J, ed. Developing focus group research. Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage Publications; 1999, pp 1-20.
12. Krueger RA. Focus group. A practical guide for applied research. California: Sage Publications; 1988.
13. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Verbeek JH, de Boer AG, Blonk RW, van Dijk FJ. Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems. Occup Environ Med 2004;61(10):817-823.
14. Janssen N, van den Heuvel WP, Beurskens AJ, Nijhuis FJ, Schroer CA, van Eijk JT. The Demand-Control-Support model as a predictor of return to work. Int J Rehabil Res 2003;26(1):1-9.
15. Kenny DT. Employers' perspectives on the provision of suitable duties in occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 1999;9(4):267-276.
16. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: A review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998;8(2):113-139.
17. Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(4):607-631.
18. Navarro V, Shi L. The political context of social inequalities and health. Soc Sci Med 2001;52(3):481-491.
19. Östlin P. Gender inequalities in health: The significance of work. In: Wamala SP, Lynch J, ed. Gender and social inequities in health. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2002, pp. 43-65.
20. Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Theorell T. Effect of change in the psychosocial work environment on sickness absence: A seven year follow up of initially healthy employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54(7):484-493.
21. Vahtera J, Kivimaki M, Pentti J. Effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees. Lancet 1997;350(9085):1124-1128.
22. Bourbonnais R, Mondor M. Job strain and sickness absence among nurses in the province of Quebec. Am J Ind Med 2001;39(2):194-202.
23. North FM, Syme SL, Feeney A, Shipley M, Marmot M. Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: The Whitehall II study. Am J Public Health 1996;86(3):332-340.
24. Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F. Physical, psychosocial, and organisational factors relative to sickness absence: A study based on Sweden Post. Occup Environ Med 2001;58(3):178-184.
25. Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F. How do job characteristics, family situation, domestic work, and lifestyle factors relate to sickness absence? A study based on Sweden Post. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46(11):1134-1143.
26. Vingard E, Lindberg P, Josephson M, Voss M, Heijbel B, Alfredsson L, et al. Long-term sick-listing among women in the public sector and its associations with age, social situation, lifestyle, and work factors: A three-year follow-up study. Scand J Public Health 2005;33(5):370-375.
27. North F, Syme SL, Feeney A, Head J, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG. Explaining socioeconomic differences in sickness absence: The Whitehall II Study. BMJ 1993;306(6874):361-366.
28. Ostlund G, Cedersund E, Hensing G, Alexanderson K. Domestic strain: A hindrance in rehabilitation? Scand J Caring Sci 2004;18(1):49-56.
29. Lundberg U, Mårdberg B, Frankenhaeuser M. The total workload of male and female white collar workers as related to age, occupational level, and number of children. Scand J Psychol 1994;35(4):315-327.
30. Hensing G, Alexanderson K. The relation of adult experience of domestic harassment, violence and sexual abuse to health and sickness absence. Int J Behav Med 2000;7:1-18.
31. Pollock N. Client-centered assessment. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47(4):298-301.
32. Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson AM, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med 2002;34(1):5-11.
33. Riksförsäkringsverket. Långtidssjukskrivna - diagnos, yrke, partiell sjukskrivning och återgång i arbete (Long-term sick-listed - diagnoses, occupation, partial sick-listing and return to work). Stockholm: Riksförsäkringsverket, 2004. Report No.: 2004:7. (In Swedish.)
34. Dunn W, Brown C, McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. Am J Occup Ther 1994;48(7):595-607.
35. Law M, Cooper BA, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The Person-Environment-Occupational Model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther 1996;63(1):9-23.