Maximally entangled three-qubit states via geometric measure of entanglement

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Tamaryan, Sayatnova ^a,d   Wei, Tzu Chieh ^b   Park, Daekil ^c  

^a YEREVAN PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Armenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d Kyungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENT; BIPARTITION; GEOMETRIC MEASURES; GREENBERGER-HORNE-ZEILINGER; LOWER BOUNDS; MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATE; MULTIPARTITE STATE; PURE STATE; QUBIT STATE; RELATIVE ENTROPY OF ENTANGLEMENT; SCHMIDT DECOMPOSITION; W STATE;

CONTROL THEORY; GEOMETRY; QUANTUM OPTICS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 70450255165     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052315     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046
2. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80. 2245
3. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824
4. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935). 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
5. J. S. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964).
6. G. Vidal and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5803 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5803
7. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5239
8. C. H. Bennett, S. Popescu, D. Rohrlich, J. A. Smolin, and A. V. Thapliyal, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012307 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.012307
9. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314
10. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, and H. Verschelde, Phys. Rev. A 65, 052112 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.052112
11. D. Cavalcanti, F. G. S. L. Brandäo, and M. O. Terra Cunha, Phys. Rev. A 72, 040303 (R) (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.040303
12. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, in Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, edited by, M. Kafatos, (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989).
13. V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306
14. V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2275
15. M. B. Plenio and V. Vedral J. Phys. A 34, 6997 (2001) 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/325
16. T.-C. Wei, M. Ericsson, P. M. Goldbart, and W. J. Munro, Quantum Inf. Comput. 4, 252 (2004).
17. K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.883
18. W. J. Munro, D. F. V. James, A. G. White, and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. A 64, 030302 (R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.030302
19. F. Verstraete, K. Audenaert, and B. De Moor, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012316 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012316
20. T.-C. Wei, K. Nemoto, P. M. Goldbart, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. A 67, 022110 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022110
21. T.-C. Wei and P. M. Goldbart, Phys. Rev. A 68, 042307 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042307
22. H. A. Carteret, A. Higuchi, and A. Sudbery, J. Math. Phys. 41, 7932 (2000). 10.1063/1.1319516
23. A. Acín, A. Andrianov, L. Costa, E. Jané, J. I. Latorre, and R. Tarrach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1560 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1560
24. L. Tamaryan, D. K. Park, and S. Tamaryan, e-print arXiv:0809.1290.
25. G. Vidal, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 355 (2000).
26. R. Werner and A. Holevo, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4353 (2002). 10.1063/1.1498491
27. O. Biham, M. A. Nielsen, and T. J. Osborne, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062312 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.062312
28. O. Gühne, M. Reimpell, and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 110502 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.110502
29. L. Tamaryan, D. K. Park, J.-W. Son, and S. Tamaryan, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032304 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032304
30. J. J. Hilling and A. Sudbery, e-print arXiv:0905.2094.
31. These solutions are minimizing the overlap. Stationarity equations do not differ maximums and mimimums and give both extremes. Surprisingly, there is a solution which, depending on state parameters, maximizes the overlap for some states and minimizes for some other states. This solution is presented in Sec..
32. P. Parashar and S. Rana, Phys. Rev. A 80, 012319 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.012319
33. Notice that the maximal angle θmax is given by tan θmax =22 and this is the angle between sides of a regular tetrahedron.
34. L. Tamaryan, D. K. Park, and S. Tamaryan, Phys. Rev. A 77, 022325 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022325
35. E. Jung, M. R. Hwang, H. Kim, M. S. Kim, D. K. Park, J. W. Son, and S. Tamaryan, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062317 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.062317
36. R. Hübener, M. Kleinmann, T.-C. Wei, C. González- Guillén, and O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032324 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032324
37. Notice that when t=0, the phase γ can be further made zero by changing local phases as eiγ can be absorbed in the definition of the product state | 111. It turns out that for 0≤γ≤π/4, the maximal entanglement is achieved when t=0 and GHZ is the only maximally entangled state in this range.
38. For mixed state, the three-tangle does not properly quantify even some GHZ-type states [E. Jung, D. K. Park and J. W. Son, Phys. Rev. A 80, 010301 (R) (2009)]. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.010301