Geometric measure of entanglement for symmetric states

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Hübener, Robert ^a   Kleinmann, Matthias ^b   Wei, Tzu Chieh ^c   González Guillén, Carlos ^d   Gühne, Otfried ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRIC MEASURES; HOMOGENEOUS POLYNOMIALS; MULTILINEAR FORMS; QUANTUM STATE; SPIN MODELS; SYMMETRIC STATE;

EID: 70349436052     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032324     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. M. Plenio and S. Virmani, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 1 (2007)
2. R. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009). 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
3. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009). 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004
4. A well-known exception is the entanglement of formation or the concurrence for two qubits, see W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245
5. B. M. Terhal and K. G. H. Vollbrecht, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2625 (2000) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2625
6. P. Rungta and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012307 (2003) 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012307
7. R. Lohmayer, A. Osterloh, J. Siewert, and A. Uhlmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 260502 (2006) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.260502
8. T.-C. Wei, Phys. Rev. A 78, 012327 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012327
9. T.-C. Wei and P. M. Goldbart, Phys. Rev. A 68, 042307 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042307
10. M. Hayashi, D. Markham, M. Murao, M. Owari, and S. Virmani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 040501 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.040501
11. T.-C. Wei, D. Das, S. Mukhopadyay, S. Vishveshwara, and P. M. Goldbart, Phys. Rev. A 71, 060305 (R) (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.060305
12. R. Orus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 130502 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 130502
13. R. Orus, S. Dusuel, and J. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 025701 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.025701
14. Y. Nakata, D. Markham, and M. Murao, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042313 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042313
15. T.-C. Wei, e-print arXiv:0810.2564.
16. D. Gross, S. T. Flammia, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190501 (2009) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190501
17. M. J. Bremner, C. Mora, and A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190502 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190502
18. D. Markham, A. Miyake, and S. Virmani, New J. Phys. 9, 194 (2007) 10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/194
19. J. J. Hilling and A. Sudbery, e-print arXiv:0905.2094.
20. M. Hayashi, D. Markham, M. Murao, M. Owari, and S. Virmani, Phys. Rev. A 77, 012104 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.012104
21. L. Tamaryan, D. K. Park, and S. Tamaryan, Phys. Rev. A 77, 022325 (2008) 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022325
22. S. Tamaryan, T.-C. Wei, and D. Park, e-print arXiv:0905.3791.
23. O. Gühne, F. Bodoky, and M. Blaauboer, Phys. Rev. A 78, 060301 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.060301
24. M. Hayashi, D. Markham, M. Murao, M. Owari, and S. Virmani, e-print arXiv:0905.0010
25. T.-C. Wei and S. Severini, e-print arXiv:0905.0012.
26. P. Gawron, Z. Puchala, J. Miszczak, L. Skowronek, M. Choi, and K. Zyczkowski, e-print arXiv:0905.3646.
27. A polynomial P is N -homogeneous if P (λx) = λN P (x).
28. S. Dineen, Complex Analysis on Infinite Dimensional Spaces (Springer, London, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999).
29. O. D. Kellogg, Math. Z. 27, 55 (1928) 10.1007/BF01171085
30. S. Banach, Ann. Pol. Math 12, 116 (1933).
31. L. Hörmander, Math. Scand. 2, 55 (1954).
32. T. Takagi, Jpn. J. Math. 1, 83 (1927)
33. see also R. Horn and C. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999), p. 204.
34. Note that e and e□ are vectors with complex conjugated elements, i.e., e= er +i ei and e□ = er -i ei where er, ei □ Rk. Hence er, ei is an example for a real basis, being linearly independent since e ≡ e□. In fact, any real orthonormal basis of spanC (f1, f2, as long as they fulfill (iii).
35. An example of a for four-qubit state where the maximizations over real and complex product vectors differ is |ψ□ = [| 0000 □ + | 0001 □ + | 0010 □ + | 0100 □ + | 1000 □ -2 (| 1110 □ + | 1101 □ + | 1011 □ + | 0111 □)] / 21.
36. G. Pólya, Acta Math. 68, 145 (1937). 10.1007/BF02546665
37. See Chapter 5 (Fig. 5.3) in T.-C. Wei, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004.
38. C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. 10, 1388 (1969). 10.1063/1.1664978
39. G. Tóth and O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 170503 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.170503
40. One can embed isometrically l1k (i.e., Rk with norm ∥ 1) into Hk by a direct mapping into the diagonal. As c (N, l1k) = NN /N! for N≤k [17] and on the other hand c (N,E) ≤ NN /N! for any Banach space E, we have c (N, Hk) = NN /N! for N≤k.
41. A. Defant and K. Floret, Tensor Norms and Operator Ideals (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993).
42. A. Grothendieck, Bol. Soc. Mat. São Paulo 8, 1 (1953).
43. R. F. Werner and A. S. Holevo, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4353 (2002). 10.1063/1.1498491