Exploring key factors in the choice of e-health using an asthma care mobile service model

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 884-890

  Lin, Shu Ping ^a   Yang, Hung Yu ^a,b  

^a CHUNG HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b YUANPEI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Asthma care mobile service (ACMS); Disease management; Health monitoring; Innovativeness; Subjective norm; Technology acceptance model (TAM); Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH MONITORING; INNOVATIVENESS; MOBILE SERVICE; SUBJECTIVE NORM; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

HEALTH; MONITORING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELEMEDICINE;

WIRELESS NETWORKS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; TELEHEALTH; VALIDATION PROCESS; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ASTHMA; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FEMALE; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70450196345     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0047     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989;13:319-340.
2. Bhatti T. Exploring factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce. J Internet Banking Commerce 2007;12:1-13.
3. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000;46:186-204.
4. Yang KCC. Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore. Telematics Inform 2005;22:257-277.
5. McFarland DJ, Hamilton D. Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Comput Hum Behav 2006;22:427-447.
6. Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Inf Manage 2006;43:350-363.
7. Robinson JL, Marshall GW, Stamps MB. Sales force use of technology: Antecedents to technology acceptance. J Business Res. 2005;58:1623-1631.
8. Schepers J, Wetzels M. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf Manage 2007;44:90-103.
9. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Inf Manage 2002;39:297-311.
10. Schaper LK, Pervan GP. ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. Int J Med Inf 2007;76:212-221.
11. Wu JH, Wang SC, Lin LM. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:66-77.
12. Richard K. An empirical examination of patient-physician portal acceptance. Eur J Inf Syst 2007;16:751-761.
13. Hartwick J, Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Manage Sci 1994;40:440-465.
14. Hurt HT, Joseph K, Cook CD. Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Hum Commun Res 1977;4:58-65.
15. Nunnally JC. Psychonometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
16. Bagozzi RP, Yi T. On the evaluation of structural equation model. J Acad Marketing Sci 1988;16:74-94.
17. Hair JF, Black B, Babin B, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2006.