Case law in extended argumentation frameworks

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 118-127

  Bench Capon, Trevor ^b   Modgil, Sanjay ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; CASE LAW; DIALOGUE GAME; VALUE-BASED ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 70450189396     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1568234.1568248     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. V. Aleven. Teaching Case Based Argumentation Through an Example and Models. Phd thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1997.
2. K. D. Ashley. Modeling Legal Argument. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990.
3. K. Atkinson, T. Bench-Capon, and P. McBurney. Arguing about cases as practical reasoning. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL 2005), pages 35-44. ACM Press, 2005.
4. T. Bench-Capon. Representation of case law as an argumentation framework. In A. Daskalopoulu T. Bench-Capon and R. Winkels, editors, Proceedings of JURIX 2002, pages 103-112, Amsterdman, The Netherlands, 2002. IOS Press.
5. T. Bench-Capon and E. L. Rissland. Back to the future: dimensions revisited. In B. Verheij, A. Lodder, R. Loui, and A. Muntjewerff, editors, Proceedings of JURIX 2001, pages 41-52, Amsterdman, The Netherlands, 2001. IOS Press.
6. T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13 3:429-48, 2003.
7. T. J. M. Bench-Capon. Try to see it my way: Modelling persuasion in legal discourse. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11 (4):271-87, 2003.
8. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson, and Alison Chorley. Persuasion and value in legal argument. J. Log. Comput., 15(6):1075-1097, 2005.
9. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sylvie Doutre, and Paul E. Dunne. Audiences in argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell., 171(1):42-71, 2007.
10. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon and Giovanni Sartor. A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif. Intell., 150(1-2):97-143, 2003.
11. D. H. Berman and C. D. Hafner. Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link. In Proc. of the 4th ICAIL, pages 50-59. ACM Press, 1993.
12. Karl Branting. A reduction-graph model of ratio decidendi. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, pages 40-49, 1993.
13. L. Karl Branting. Reasoning with portions of prcedents. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on AI and Law (ICAIL 1991), pages 145-154. ACM Press, 1991.
14. C. G. Christie. The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument. Kluwer Academic Press, 2000.
15. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
16. Paul E. Dunne and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Coherence in finite argument systems. Artif. Intell., 141(1/2):187-203, 2002.
17. Paul E. Dunne and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency. Artif. Intell., 149(2):221-250, 2003.
18. T. F. Gordon and N. I. Karacapilidis. The Zeno argumentation framework. In Proc. of 6th International Conference on AI and Law, pages 10-18. ACM Press, 1997.
19. Thomas F. Gordon and Douglas Walton. Pierson vs. post revisited - a reconstruction using the carneades argumentation framework. In Paul E. Dunne and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, editors, COMMA, volume 144 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 208-219. IOS Press, 2006.
20. S. Modgil. Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence (doi:10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001), 2009. In press.
21. Sanjay Modgil and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. Integrating object and meta-level value based argumentation. In Philippe Besnard, Sylvie Doutre, and Anthony Hunter, editors, COMMA, volume 172 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 240-251. IOS Press, 2008.
22. C. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, USA, 1969.
23. Henry Prakken. Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowledge Eng. Review, 21(2):163-188, 2006.
24. A. Wyner, T. Bench-Capon, and K. Atkinson. Arguments, values and baseballs: Representation of popov v. hayashi. In Proceedings of Jurix 2007, pages 151-160, Amsterdam, 2007. IOS Press.