Arguments, Values and Baseballs: Representation of Popov v. Hayashi

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 165, Issue , 2007, Pages 151-160

  Wyner, Adam ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a   Atkinson, Katie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argument Schemes; Argumentation; Case based Reasoning; Values

Indexed keywords

BASEBALL;

ARGUMENT SCHEME; ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; CASEBASED REASONINGS (CBR); FORMAL ANALYSIS; LEGAL CASE; LEGAL RULES; VALUE;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 84997056669     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. K. Atkinson. What Should We Do?: Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK, 2005.
2. K. Atkinson and T. Bench-Capon. Argumentation and standards of proof. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2007), pages 107-116. ACM Press, 2007.
3. T. Bench-Capon. Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation, 13(3):429-48, 2003.
4. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357, 1995.
5. P. Finkelman. Fugitive baseballs and abandoned property: Who owns the home run ball? Cardozo Law Review, 23(5):1609-1633, 2002.
6. T. Gordon and D. Walton. Pierson v. Post revisited. In P. E. Dunne and T. Bench-Capon, editors, Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, pages 208-219. IOS Press, 2006.
7. T. L. McCarty and N. S. Sridharan. The representation of an evolving system of legal concepts: II. prototypes and deformations. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1981), pages 246-253, 1981.