Ambivalence under scrutiny: Returning to the future;La ambivalencia bajo escrutinio: Regresando al futuro

Estudios de Psicologia

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 117-130

  Valsiner, Jaan ^a  

^a CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambivalence; cognitive modelling; dialogical self; evolutionary psychology; finite simplicial complex; Morse functions; qualitative mathematics; theory of locales

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450098063     PISSN: 02109395     EISSN: 15793699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021093906776173207     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abbey, E. A., (2006). Triadic frames for ambivalent experience. Estudios de Psicologia, 21 (1), 33–40.
2. Aslin, R. N., (1993). Commentary: the strange attractiveness of dynamic systems to development. In L. B., Smith & E., Thelen (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development (pp. 385–389). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. th Century. In A., Shenitzer & J., Stillwell (Eds), Mathematical evolutions (pp. 1–15). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
4. Bates, A., & Maxwell, A., (2005). DNA topology. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Beek, P., & Hopkins, B., (1992). Four requirements for a dynamic systems approach to the development of social coordination. Human Movement Sciences, 11, 425–442.
6. Bergson, H., (1889). Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Paris: PUF.
7. Bergson, H., (1896/1988). Matière et mémoire. Paris: PUF. [English translation 1988 by Urzone/Zed Books].
8. Brower, D., (1949). The problem of quantification in psychological science. Psychological Review, 56, 325–333.
9. Branco, A. U., & Valsiner, J., (1997). Changing methodologies: A co-constructivist study of goal orientations in social interactions. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 1, 35–64.
10. Brush, S. G., (1996). The reception of Mendeleev's Periodic Law in America and Britain. Isis, 81, 595–628.
11. Buller, A., (2006). Mechanisms underlying ambivalence: a psychodynamic model. Estudios de Psicologia, 27 (1), 49–66.
12. Christiansen, P. V., (2000). Macro and micro-levels in physics. In P. B., Andersen, C., Emmeche, N. O., Finnemann and P. V., Christiansen (Eds.), Downward causation: minds, bodies, and matter (pp. 51–62). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
13. Donnelly, M., (1998). From political arithmetic to social statistics: how some nineteenth-century roots of the social sciences were implanted. In J., Heilbron, L., Magnusson & B., Wittrock (Eds.), The rise of the social sciences and the formation of modernity (pp. 225–239). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Eilenberg, S., & Maclane, S., (1945). General theory of natural equivalences. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 58, 2, 231–294.
15. Ferreira, T., Salgado, J., & Cunha, C., (2006). Ambiguity and the dialogical self: In search for a dialogical psychology. Estudios de Psicologia, 27 (1), 19–32.
16. Galis, T., & Haviv, N., (submitted). The importance of doing nothing: International actors and the prevention of genocide. International Relations.
17. Gigerenzer, G., (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98 (2), 254–267.
18. Gigerenzer, G., (1993). The Superego, the Ego, and the Id in statistical reasoning. In G., Keren & C., Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 311–339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Gottlieb, G., (2003). Probabilistic epigenesis of development. In J., Valsiner & K. J, Connolly, (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 3–17). London: Sage.
20. Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R., (2002). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Grosser, M., (1962). The discovery of Neptune. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Hentschel, K., (1992). Einsteins attitude towards experiments: testing relativity theory 1907–1927. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23, 4, 593–624
23. Hermans, H. J. M., (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 1, 31–50.
24. Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G., (1995). Body, mind, and culture: Dialogical nature of mediated action. Culture & Psychology, 1, 1, 104–114
25. Joyce, D., & Kennison, J., (2006). Mathematical concepts for analyzing ambiguous situations. Estudios de Psicologia, 27 (1), 85–100.
26. Lewin, K., (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Lewin, K., (1938). The conceptual representation and measurement in psychology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
28. Lewis, M. D., (1995). Cognition-emotion feedback and the self-organization of developmental paths. Human Development, 38, 71–102.
29. Lewis, M. D., (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71, 1, 36–43.
30. London, I., (1944). Psychologists' misuse of the auxiliary concepts of physics and mathematics. Psychological Review, 51, 266–291.
31. Mernissi, F., (2002). The fear of freedom of thought. In F. Mernissi, Islam and democracy (pp. 85–103). New York: Basic Books.
32. Michell, J., (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–383.
33. Michell, J., (1999). Measurement in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Molenaar, P. C. M., (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 4, 201–218.
35. Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R., (2003). The relationship between the structure of interindividual and intraindividual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of Developmental Systems Theory. In U. M., Staudinger & U., Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development: Dialoques with lifespan psychology (pp. 339–360). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
36. Poddiakov, A. N., (2006). Ambivalence and cognitive heuristics for dealing with ambiguity in complex social worlds. Estudios de Psicologia, 27 (1), 101–116.
37. Preda, A., (2005). AIDS, rhetoric, and medical knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Rudolph, L., (2006). Spaces of ambivalence: qualitative mathematics in the modeling of complex fluid phenomena. Estudios de Psicologia, 21 (1), 67–83.
39. Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E., (Eds.) (1993). A dynamic systems approach to development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Sovran, T., (1992). Between similarity and sameness. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 4, 329–344.
41. Strout, S., (2006). Sex in the city: the ambiguity of female mating strategies. Estudios de Psicologia, 27 (1), 41–48.
42. Tsuda, I., (2001). Toward an interpretation of dynamic neural activity in terms of chaotic dynamic systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 793–847.
43. Valsiner, J., (1986). Between groups and individuals: Psychologists' and laypersons' interpretations of correlational findings. In J., Valsiner (Ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology (pp. 113–152). New York: Plenum.
44. nd . Ed. New York: Wiley.
45. th.
46. Valsiner, J., (2005). Attractors, repulsors, and directors: making Dynamic Systems Theory developmental. Hokkaido University Science Folia, 13–25.
47. Valsiner, J., & Abbey, E. A., (2006). Ambivalence in focus: Remembering the life and work of Else Frenkel-Brunswik. Estudios de Psicologia, 27 (1), 9–17.
48. Valsiner, J., & Diriwächter, R., (2005). Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in historischen und epistemologischen Kontexten In G. Mey (Hgbr), Qualitative Forschung in der Entwicklungspsychologie (pp. 35–55). Köln: Kölner Studien Verlag
49. Valsiner, J., & Sato, T., (in press). Whom to Study in Cultural Psychology: From random to historically structured sampling. In J., Straub, C., Kölbl, D., Weidemann and B., Zielke (Eds), Pursuit of Meaning. Theoretical and Methodological Advances Cultural and Cross-Cultural Psychology Bielefeld: transcript.
50. Valsiner, J., & Van DER, Veer, R., (1993). The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations. In R. R., Cocking & K. A., Renninger (Eds.), The development and meaning of psychological distance (pp. 35–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Van Geert, P., (1994). Dynamic systems of development. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
52. Van Geert, P., (1998). We almost had a great future behind us: the contribution of non-linear dynamics to developmental-science-in-the-making. Developmental Science, 1, 143–159.
53. Van Geert, P., (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J., Valsiner & K. J., Connolly (Eds), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640–672). London: Sage.
54. Wagoner, B., & Valsiner, J., (2005). Rating tasks in psychology: from static ontology to dialogical synthesis of meaning. In A., Gülerç, I., Steauble, A., Hofmeister, G., Saunders and J., Kaye (Eds.), Contemporary theorizing in psychology: Global perspectives (pp. 197–213). Toronto: Captus Press.
55. Weyl, H., (2002). Topology and abstract algebra as two roads of mathematical comprehension. In A., Shenitzer & J., Stillwell (Eds), Mathematical evolutions (149–162). Washington, D.C.: Mathematical Association of America. [German original from 1931]