Quantifying mineral dust mass budgets : Terminology, constraints, and current estimates

Eos

Volumn 85, Issue 48, 2004, Pages

  Zender, C S ^a   Miller, R L ^b   Tegen, I ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NASA GODDARD INSTITUTE FOR SPACE STUDIES   (United States)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR TROPOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450081735     PISSN: 00963941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2004EO480002     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Luo, C., N. M. Mahowald, and J. del Corral (2003), Sensitivity study of meteorological parameters on mineral aerosol mobilization, transport, and distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4447, doi:10.1029/2003JD003483.
2. Myhre, G. A., et al. (2004), Intercomparison of satellite retrieved aerosol optical depth over ocean, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 499-513.
3. Perlwitz, J., I. Tegen, and R. L. Miller (2001), Interactive soil dust aerosol model in the GISS GCM: 1. Sensitivity of the soil dust cycle to radiative properties of soil dust aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 18, 167-18, 192.
4. Prospero, J. M., P. Ginoux, O. Torres, S. E. Nicholson, and T. E. Gill (2002), Environmental characterization of global sources of atmospheric soil dust identified with the NIMBUS 7 Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer absorbing aerosol product, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1002, doi:10.1029/2000RG000095.
5. Zender, C. S., D. J. Newman, and O. Torres (2003), Spatial heterogeneity in aeolian erodibility: Uniform, topographic, geomorphic, and hydrologic hypotheses, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4543, doi:10.1029/2002JD003039.