Tactile force perception depends on the visual speed of the collision object

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1-9

  Arai, Kan ^a   Okajima, Katsunori ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Magnitude; Motion information; Multimodal processing; Tactile perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STIMULATION; TOUCH;

FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70449713544     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.11.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bresciani, J. P., Dammeier, F., & Ernst, M. O. (2006). Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. Journal of Vision, 6(5):2, 554-564, http://journalofvision.org/6/5/2/, doi:10.1167/6.5.2.
2. Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse experimentale: De quelques éléments de la sensation de poids. Archives de Phisiologie Normale et Pathologique, 3, 122-135.
3. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science, 287, 2036-2038.
4. Ellis, R. R., & Lederman, S. J. (1993). The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 315-324.
5. Ernst, M. O. (2009). Perceptual learning: Inverting the size-weight illusion. Current Biology, 19, R23-R25.
6. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
7. Flanagan, J. R., & Beltzner, M. A. (2000). Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the sizeweight illusion. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 737-741.
8. Fujisaki, W., Shimojo, S., Kashino, M., & Nishida, S. (2004). Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 773-778.
9. Geldard, F. A., & Sherrick, C. E. (1972). The cutaneous " Rabbit" : A perceptual illusion. Science, 178, 178-179.
10. Gepshtein, S., & Banks, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology, 13, 483-488.
11. Gepshtein, S., Burge, J., Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2005). The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity. Journal of Vision, 5(11):7, 1013-1023, http://journalofvision.org/5/11/7/, doi:10.1167/5.11.7.
12. Guest, S., Catmur, C., Lloyd, D., & Spence, C. (2002). Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 161-171.
13. Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2007). Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception, 36, 1523-1533.
14. Johnson, K. O., Yoshioka, T., & Vega-Bermudez, F. (2000). Tactile functions of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hand. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 17, 539-558.
15. Lederman, S. J., & Abbott, S. G. (1981). Texture perception: Studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm, and visual versus tactual psychophysics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 902-915.
16. Lederman, S. J., Thorne, G., & Jones, B. (1986). Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 169-180.
17. Murray, D. J., Ellis, R. R., Bandomir, C. A., & Ross, H. E. (1999). Charpantier (1891) on the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1681-1685.
18. Ross, H. E. (1969). When is a weight not illusory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 346-355.
19. Spence, C., & Squire, S. (2003). Multisensory integration: Maintaining the perception of synchrony. Current Biology, 13, R519-R521.
20. Vallbo, A. B., & Johansson, R. S. (1984). Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Human Neurobiology, 3, 3-14.
21. Weisenberger, J. M., & Poling, G. L. (2004). Multisensory roughness perception of virtual surfaces: Effects of correlated cues. ProceedingsV12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 161-168.
22. Wozny, D. R., Beierholm, U. R., & Shams, L. (2008). Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference. Journal of Vision, 8(3):24, 1-11, http://journalofvision.org/8/3/24/, doi:10.1167/8.3.24.