Effects of pedigree errors on the efficiency of conservation decisions

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2009, Pages

  Oliehoek, Pieter A ^a   Bijma, Piter ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANCESTRY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DATA INTERPRETATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; KINSHIP; MODEL TEST;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 70449704407     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations. JD Ballou RC Lacy, Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation New York: Columbia University Press, Ballou JD, Gilpin ME, Foose TJ, 1995 375 76 111
2. R Frankham JD Ballou DA Briscoe, Introduction to Conservation Genetics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2002
3. Optimisation of contribution of candidate parents to maximise genetic gain and restricting inbreeding using semidefinite programming (Open Access publication). R Pong-Wong JA Woolliams, Genetics Selection Evolution 2007 39 3 25 10.1051/gse:2006031 (Pubitemid 46103348)
4. Minimization of rate of inbreeding for small populations with overlapping generations. AK Sonesson THE Meuwissen, Genetical Research 2001 77 285 292 10.1017/S0016672301005079 11486511
5. Assessing the contribution of breeds to genetic diversity in conservation schemes. H Eding R Crooijmans MAM Groenen THE Meuwissen, Genetics Selection Evolution 2002 34 613 633 10.1051/gse:2002027
6. Estimating Relatedness Between Individuals in General Populations With a Focus on Their Use in Conservation Programs. PA Oliehoek JJ Windig JAM van Arendonk P Bijma, Genetics 2006 173 483 496 16510792 10.1534/genetics.105.049940 (Pubitemid 43800217)
7. Strategic planning for captive populations: Projecting changes in genetic diversity. JM Earnhardt SD Thompson K Schad, Animal Conservation 2004 7 9 16 10.1017/S1367943003001161 (Pubitemid 40318514)
8. Wrong and missing sire information affects genetic gain in the Angeln dairy cattle population. K Sanders J Bennewitz E Kalm, Journal of Dairy Science 2006 89 315 16357295
9. Use of DNA markers to determine paternity in a multiple-sire mating flock. AM Laughlin DF Waldron BF Craddock GR Engdahl RK Dusek JE Huston CJ Lupton DN Ueckert TL Shay NE Coekett, Sheep and Goat Research Journal 2003 18 14 17
10. History of Lipizzan horse maternal lines as revealed by mtDNA analysis. T Kavar G Brem F Habe J Sölkner P Dovc, Genetics Selection Evolution 2002 34 635 10.1051/gse:2002028
11. Estimation of pedigree errors in the UK dairy population using microsatellite markers and the impact on selection. PM Visscher JA Woolliams D Smith JL Williams, Journal of Dairy Science 2002 85 2368 12362470
12. Utilisation of molecular information in dairy cattle breeding. RJ Spelman, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 2002 11 17
13. How reliable are sheep pedigrees? AM Crawford ML Tate JC McEwan G Kumaramanickavel KM McEwan KG Dodds PA Swarbrick P Thompson, Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 1993 53 363 366
14. Protein polymorphism in sheep pedigree testing. S Wang WC Foote, Theriogenology 1990 34 1079 1085 10.1016/S0093-691X(05)80007-X
15. Estimation of milk protein gene frequencies in crossbred cattle by maximum likelihood. H Bovenhuis JA Van Arendonk, Journal of Dairy Science 1991 74 2728 1918546
16. Analysis of Vaginal Swabs for Paternity Testing and Marker-Assisted Selection in Cattle. M Ron R Domochovsky M Golik E Seroussi E Ezra C Shturman JI Weller, Journal of Dairy Science 2003 86 1818 1820 12778592
17. Factors Affecting Incorrect Paternity Assignment in the Israeli Holstein Population. JI Weller E Feldmesser M Golik I Tager-Cohen R Domochovsky O Alus E Ezra M Ron, Journal of Dairy Science 2004 87 2627 2640 15328288
18. Systematic Procedures For Calculating Inbreeding Coefficients. LO Emik CE Terrill, Journal of Heredity 1949 40 51 55 18116093
19. Accounting for Inbreeding and Crossbreeding in Genetic Evaluation of Large Populations. PM VanRaden, Journal of Dairy Science 1992 75 3136 3144
20. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. A Caballero MA Toro, Genetical Research 2000 75 331 343 10.1017/S0016672399004449 10893869
21. Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: Founder equivalents and founder genome equivalents. RC Lacy, Zoo Biology 1989 8 111 10.1002/zoo. 1430080203
22. Communicating statistical information. U Hoffrage S Lindsey R Hertwig G Gigerenzer, Science 2000 290 2261 10.1126/science.290.5500.2261 11188724
23. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. THE Meuwissen, Journal of Animal Science 1997 75 934 940 9110204
24. Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations. J Fernandez MA Toro A Caballero, Genetics 2003 165 885 894 14573495
25. Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations. L Snchez P Bijma JA Woolliams, Genetics 2003 164 1589 1595 12930762
26. PyPedal: A computer program for pedigree analysis. JB Cole, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2007 57 107 113 10.1016/j.compag.2007.02.002 (Pubitemid 46505366)
27. Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. JD Ballou, Journal of Heredity 1997 88 169 9183845