An analytical approach to building a technology development envelope (tde) for roadmapping of emerging technologies

International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 121-135

  Gerdsri, N ^a,b  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b Portland State University   (United States)

Author keywords

TDE; Technology development envelope; Technology roadmapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449702244     PISSN: 02198770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219877007001004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Azani, C. H. and Khorramshahgol, R. (1992). A product planning support system for strategic planning and implementation. IEEE in Engineering Management, pp. 190- 193.
2. Azar, K. (2000). The history of power dissipation. Electronics Cooling, 6: 42-50.
3. Azar, K. (2001). The future of thermal management in the unstable technology market. Electronics Cooling, 7: 1.
4. Betz, F. (1998). Managing Technological Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. Bower, J. L. and Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 43-53.
6. Bray, O. H. and Garcia, M. L. (1997). Technology roadmapping: The integration of strategic and technology planning for competitiveness. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR.
7. Bright, J. R. and Schoeman, M. E. F. (1973). A Guide to Practical Technological Forecasting. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Byun, D.-H. (1998). Prioritizing telecommunication standardization work areas using Delphi Analytic Hierarchy process based on a spreadsheet model. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 11, 1-2: 45-52.
9. Cauffiel, D. A. and Porter, A. L. (1996). Electronic manufacturing in 2020: A national technological university management of technology mini-Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 51: 185-194.
10. Cetron, M. J. (1969). Technological Forecasting: A Practical Approach, Technology Forecasting Institute, New York.
11. Chakravarti, A. K. (1998). Modified Delphi methodology for technology forecasting: Case study of electronics and information in India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58: 155-165.
12. Chun, Y. H. (1994). Sequential decisions under uncertainty in the R&D project selection problem. IEEE Transaction in Engineering Management, 41, 4: 404-413.
13. Costello, D. (1983). A practical approach to R&D selection. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23: 353-368.
14. Dalkey, N. C. and Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9: 458-467.
15. Dieftz, T. (1987). Methods for analyzing data from Delphi panels: Some evidence from a forecasting study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 31: 79-85.
16. Easley, R. F., et al. (2000). Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision. European Journal of Operational Research, 125: 73-83.
17. Galvin, R. (1998). Science roadmaps. Science, 280, May: 803.
18. Gedney, R. W. (1998). The implication of roadmapping on university research. 1998 Electronic Components and Technology Conference.
19. Groenveld, P. (1997). Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Research Technology Management, pp. 48-55.
20. Hall, D. L. and Nauda, A. (1990). An interactive approach for selecting IR&D projects. IEEE Transaction in Engineering Management, 47, 2: 126-133.
21. Henriksen, A. D. and Traynor, A. J. (1999). A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Transaction in Engineering Management, 46, 2: 158-170.
22. Hill, K. Q. and Fowler, J. (1975). The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 7: 179-192.
23. Intel (2001). Moore?s Law, www.intel.com/research/silicon/mooreslaw.htm.
24. Iyigun, M. G. (1993). A decision support system linking research and development project selection with business strategy. Project Management Journal, 24: 5-13.
25. Jantsch, E. (1967). Technological forecasting in perspective: A framework for technological forecasting. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris.
26. Kappel, T. A. (2001). Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18: 39-50.
27. Khorramshahgol, R., (1988). An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35, 4: 265-271.
28. Khorramshahgol, R. and Steiner, H. (1988). Resource analysis in project evaluation: A multicriteria approach. Journal of Operational Research Society, 39, 9: 795-803.
29. Khorramshahgol, R. and Vassilis, S. (1988). Delphic Hierarchy Process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the Delphi Method and Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 37, 3: 347-354.
30. Khrustalev, D. (2001). Loop Thermosyphons for Cooling of Electronics, Thermacore, Inc.
31. Kocaoglu, D. F. and Iyigun, M. G. (1994). Strategic R&D project selection and resource allocation with a decision support system application. IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.
32. Kokubo, A. (1992). Japanese competitive intelligence for R&D. Research-Technology Management, January-February: 33-34.
33. Kostoff, R. N. and Schaller, R. R. (2001). Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 2: 132-143.
34. Liberatore, M. J. and Titus, G. J. (1983). The practice of management science in R&D project management. Management Science, 29, 8: 962-974.
35. Linstone, H. A. (1999). Decision Making for Technology Executives: Using Multiple Perspectives to Improve Performance, Artech House Publishers.
36. Linstone, H. A. (1999). TFSC 1969-1999. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65: 1-8.
37. Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, London.
38. Martino, J. P. (1987). An Introduction to Technological Forecasting. Gordon and Breach, New York.
39. Martino, J. P. (1993). Technological Forecasting. The Futurist, July-August: 13-16.
40. McCarthy, K. J. (1992). Comment on the Analytic Delphi Method. International Journal of Production Economics, 27, 2: 135-137.
41. Azani, H. and Khorramshahgol (1990), R. Analytic Delphi Method (ADM): A strategic decision making model applied to Location Planning. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 20, 1: 23-29.
42. Mitchell, A. (1975). Handbook of Forecasting Techniques. Stanford Research Institute, Springfield, VA.
43. Montgomery, S. (2002). High-density architecture meets electrical and thermal challenges. Intel Developer Update Magazine. March: 1-8.
44. Phaal, R. and Probert, D. R. (2001). Workshop: Fast-start technology roadmapping. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR.
45. Porter, A. L. (1991). Forecasting and Management of Technology. Wiley, New York.
46. Radhakrishna, A. V. and Vardarajan, A. (1991). Maximizing innovation in industry and adopting to change. Industrial Management, November/December: 19-21.
47. Radnor, M. and Peterson, J. W. (1999). Aligning strategy and technology using roadmaps: Emerging lessons from the NCMS ?MATI? project. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR.
48. Rowe, G. and Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15: 353-375.
49. Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill.
50. Schmitt, R. W. (1985). Successful corporate R&D. Harvard Business Review, May-June: 124-129.
51. Shaller, R. (2001). Technological innovation in the semiconductor industry: A case study of the international technology roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS). Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR.
52. Shin, T. (1998). Using Delphi for a long-range technology forecasting and assessing directions of future R&D activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58: 125-154.
53. Souder, W. E. (1975). Achieving organizational consensus with respect to R&D project selection criteria. Management Science, 21, 6: 660-681.
54. Stummer, C. and Heidenberger, K. (2001). Interactive R&D portfolio selection considering multiple objectives, project interdependencies, and time: A three-phase approach. PICMET 2001, Portland, OR.
55. Sugiura, H. (1990). How Honda localizes Its global strategy. Sloan Management Review, Fall: pp. 77-82.
56. Tavana, M. (1993). An AHP-Delphi group decision support system applied to conflict resolutions in hiring decisions. Journal of Management Systems, 5, 1: 49-74.
57. Twiss, B. (1976). Technological forecasting for decision making. Managing Technological Innovation. Longman, pp. 66-94.
58. Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (1990). Delphi questionnaires versus individual and group interviews: A comparison case. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 37: 293-304.
59. Viswanath, R. (2000). Thermal performance challenges from silicon to systems. Intel Technology Journal, Q3: 1-16.
60. Watts, R. J. and Porter, A. L. (1997). Innovation forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 56: 25-47.
61. Willyard, C. H. and McClees, C. W. (1987). Motorola?s technology roadmap process. Research Management, pp. 13-19.