Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 73-83

  Easley, Robert F ^a   Valacich, Joseph S ^b   Venkataramanan, M A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; PROBABILITY;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; GROUP PREFERENCE RANKINGS; MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING; MULTIOBJECTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 0033687368     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00196-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aczel J., Alsina C. On synthesis of judgements. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 20(6):1986;333-339.
2. Bryson N. Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: Exploring the consensus-relevant information content. Computers and Operations Research. 23(1):1996;27-35.
3. Bryson N., Mobolurin A. An approach to using the analytic hierarchy process for solving multiple criteria decision making problems. European Journal of Operational Research. 76(3):1994;440-454.
4. Dennis, A.R., Easton A.S., Easton G.K., George J.F., Nunamaker, J.F. Jr., 1990. A comparison of ad-hoc and established groups in an electronic meeting system environment. Proceedings of the 23rd Hawaiian International Conference on Systems Science, Koloa, HI, 3, 23-29.
5. Genest C., Zhang S.S. A graphical analysis of ratio-scaled paired comparison data. Management Science. 42(3):1996;335-349.
6. Green S.G., Taber T.D. The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 25:1980;97-106.
7. Iz P., Krajewski L. Comparative evaluation of three interactive multiobjective programming techniques as group decision support tools. INFOR. 30(4):1992;349-363.
8. MacKay D.B., Bowen W.M., Zinnes J.L. A Thurstonian view of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 89:1996;427-444.
9. Olson D. Review of empirical studies in multiobjective mathematical programming: Subject reflection of nonlinear utility and learning. Decision Sciences. 23(1):1992;1-20.
10. Olson D.L., Moshkovich H.M., Schellenberger R., Mechitov A.I. Consistency and accuracy in decision aids: Experiments with four multiattribute systems. Decision Sciences. 26(6):1995;723-748.
11. Paulson D., Zahir S. Consequences of uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process: A simulation approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 87(1):1995;45-56.
12. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process. 1980;Wiley, New York.
13. Saaty, T.L., 1989. Group decision making and the AHP. In: B.L. Golden, E.A. Wasil, P.T. Harker (Eds.), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies. Springer, New York, pp. 59-67.
14. Thurstone L.L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review. 34:1927;273-286.
15. Triantaphyllou E., Chi-Tun L. Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 14:1996;281-310.
16. Valacich J.S., Schwenk C. Structuring conflict in verbal versus computer-mediated group decision making. Decision Sciences. 26(3):1995;369-393.
17. Vargas L.G. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research. 48:1990;2-8.
18. Wheatley, K., 1993. Interview. CEO of option technologies. Inc., Mountain Green, UT.
19. Zimmermann, H.J., (1987). Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making and Expert Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.