Hemodynamical comparison between Airtraq® laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation

Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research

Volumn 13, Issue 39, 2009, Pages 7687-7690

  Wang, Wei Hua ^a   Xing, Yun Fei ^a   Chen, Lin ^a   Wang, Mo Li ^a  

^a Dalian Second People's Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRTRAQ LARYNGOSCOPE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPE; LENS; MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE; OBSERVATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

EID: 70449672703     PISSN: 16738225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2009.39.019     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Xing QZ, Sun LX, Li Y, et al. Unchuang Mazuixue Zazhi. 2000;16(6): 306.
2. Russell WJ, Morris RG, Frawin DB, et al. Changes in plasma catecholamine concentrations during endotracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1981;53:837-839. (Pubitemid 11044343)
3. Derbyshire DR, Chnielewski A, Fell D, et al. Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1983;55:855.
4. Zhuang XL, Zeng YM, Chen BL. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House. 2003:925.
5. Oda Y,Tanaka K,Matsuura T,et al.Nitrous oxide induces paradoxical electroencephalographic changes after tracheal intubation during isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(4):1094-1102.
6. Maharaj CH, O'Croinin D, Curley G, et al. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway managements randomised,controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesiasia. 2006;61:1093-1099. (Pubitemid 44575338)
7. Maharaj CH. Evalution of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2008;62(2):182-188.
8. Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, et al. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq® or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy - a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(5):469-477.
9. Maharaj CH, Buckley E, Harte BH, et al. Endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilizations comparison of Macintosh and Airtraq® laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(1):53-59. (Pubitemid 46987819)
10. Ndoko S, Amathieu R, Tual L, et al. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients :a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq® laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(2):263-268. (Pubitemid 351773670)
11. Dhonneur G, Ndoko S, Amathieu R, et al. Tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® in morbidly obese patients undergoing emergency cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:629-630. (Pubitemid 46662228)
12. Zhang GH, Xue FS, Li CW, et al. Zhongguo Yixue Kexueyuan Xuebao. 2006;28(3): 406-409.
13. Hirabayashi Y, Hiruta M, Kawakami T, et al. Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:253-255. (Pubitemid 28379375)
14. Zhang GH, Xue FS, Li P, et al. Effect of fiberoptic bronchoscope compared with direct laryngoscope on hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation. Chin Med J(Engl). 2007;102(4):336-338. (Pubitemid 46403485)
15. Feng RF, Meng QY, Uu SS, et al. Zhonghua Mazuixue Zazhi. 2001;21(1): 14-17.
16. Xiao WP, Cao HQ, Fang F, et al. Zhonghua Mazuixue Zazhi. 2001; 21(1): 55.
17. Bucx MJ, vanGeel RT, Scheck PA, et al. Cardiovascular effects of forces applied during laryngoscopy. The importance of tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1992;47(12):1029-1033.
18. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39(11):1105-1111.
19. Agra F, Barzoi G, Montecchia F. Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a Glidescope in 15 patients with cervial spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:705-706. (Pubitemid 36592352)
20. Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Sco N, et al. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq® or Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:635-640. (Pubitemid 351677332)
21. Timothy PT, David MP, Philip MJ. Cervical spine motion: A fluoroscopic comparison of the Airtraq® laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:97-101.
22. Maharaj CH, Costello J, Higgins BD, et al. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngocope. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(7): 671-677. (Pubitemid 43871476)
23. Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Maassen RL, et al. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:187-191.
24. Xue FS, Li XY, Xu YC, et al. Zhongguo Yiyao Daokan. 2007;9(1): 15-19.
25. Takachashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M, et al. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:480-484. (Pubitemid 34793125)
26. Adachi YU, Takamatsu I, Watanabe K, et al. Evaluation of the cardiovascular responses to fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with television monitoring:comparison with conventional direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2000;12:503-508. (Pubitemid 32008610)
27. Kovsc AL. Controlling the hymodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:63-79. (Pubitemid 26068230)