Leonard J. Goldner award 2009 intraoperative pedobarography leads to improved outcome scores: A level I study

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1029-1036

  Richter, Martinus ^a   Zech, Stefan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Arthrodesis; Clinical outcome scores; Correction; Intraoperative pedobarography (IP); Pedobarography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FOOT SURGERY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PEDOBAROGRAPHY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHORT FORM 36; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHRODESIS; BIOMECHANICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOREFOOT, HUMAN; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; SUBTALAR JOINT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 70449650664     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2009.1029     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alexander, IJ; Chao, EY; Johnson, KA: The assessment of dynamic foot-to-ground contact forces and plantar pressure distribution: a review of the evolution of current techniques and clinical applications. Foot Ankle. 11:152-167, 1990.
2. Becker, HP; Rosenbaum, D; Zeithammer, G; Gerngross, H; Claes, L: Gait pattern analysis after ankle ligament reconstruction (modified Evans procedure). Foot Ankle Int. 15:477-482, 1994.
3. Bullinger, M; Kirchberger, I: SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand, Goettingen, Germany, Verlag für Psychologie, 1998.
4. Cavanagh, PR; Henley, JD: The computer era in gait analysis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 10:471-484, 1993.
5. Cavanagh, PR; Rodgers, MM; Iiboshi, A: Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle. 7:262-276, 1987.
6. Cavanagh, PR; Ulbrecht, JS; Caputo, GM: Elevated plantar pressure and ulceration in diabetic patients after panmetatarsal head resection: two case reports. Foot Ankle Int. 20:521-526, 1999.
7. Grieve, DW; Rashdi, T: Pressures under normal feet in standing and walking as measured by foil pedobarography. Ann Rheum Dis. 43:816-818, 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.43.6.816
8. Inman, VT; Ralston, HJ; Todd, F: Human walking, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1981.
9. Khalafi, A; Landsman, AS; Lautenschlager, EP; Kelikian, AS: Plantar forefoot pressure changes after second metatarsal neck osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 26:550-555, 2005. (Pubitemid 40944209)
10. Kitaoka, HB; Alexander, IJ; Adelaar, RS; et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 15:349-353, 1994.
11. Lau, JT; Stamatis, ED; Parks, BG; Schon, LC: Modifications of the Weil osteotomy have no effect on plantar pressure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 194-198, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000126334. 22183.c1
12. Richter, M: Kinesiologische Studien zur Ganganalyse mit Leuchtspuren. 1996. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau.
13. Richter, M; Frink, M; Zech, S; et al.: Technique for Intraoperative Use of Pedography. Tech Foot Ankle. 5:88-100, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ 00132587-200606000-00006
14. Richter, M; Frink, M; Zech, S; et al.: Intraoperative pedography: a validated method for static intraoperative biomechanical assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 27:833-842, 2006.
15. Richter, M; Geerling, J; Frink, M; et al.: Computer Assisted Surgery Based (CAS) based correction of posttraumatic ankle and hindfoot deformities - Preliminary results. Foot Ankle Surg. 12:113-119, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.fas.2006.02.003
16. Richter, M; Zech, S: Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) guided arthrodesis of the foot and ankle: an analysis of accuracy in 100 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 29:1235-1242, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI. 2008.1235
17. Richter, M; Zech, S: Intraoperative 3D Imaging in Foot and Ankle Trauma. The First Clinical Experience with a Second Device Generation (ARCADIS-3D). J Orthop Trauma. 23:213-220, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819867f6
18. Richter, M; Zech, S: Is Intraoperative Pedography Helpful in Clinical Use-Preliminary Results of 100 Cases from a Consecutive, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study. Foot Ankle Surg. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2009. 03.002, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas. 2009.03.002
19. Richter, M; Zech, S; Geerling, J; et al.: A new foot and ankle outcome score: Questionnaire based, subjective, Visual-Analogue-Scale, validated and computerized. Foot Ankle Surg. 12:191-199, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fas.2006.04.001
20. Rosenbaum, D; Engelhardt, M; Becker, HP; Claes, L; Gerngross, H: Clinical and functional outcome after anatomic and nonanatomic ankle ligament reconstruction: Evans tenodesis versus periosteal flap. Foot Ankle Int. 20:636-639, 1999.
21. Saltzman, CL and Johnston, R: Impact of Comorbidities on the Measurement of Ankle Health. 51. 2005. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), 21st Annual Summer Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 15.-17.07.2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech. 2007.09.006
22. Schmiegel, A; Vieth, V; Gaubitz, M; Rosenbaum, D: Pedography and radiographic imaging for the detection of foot deformities in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 23:648-652, 2008.
23. SooHoo, N; Alexander, IJ; Brage, M; Sangeorzan, BJ: Symposium X - Outcomes Assessment in Foot and Ankle Surgery - What Instrument Should We Use? American Orthropaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), 19th Annual Summer Meeting Hilton Head South Carolina June 27-29 2003. 2003.
24. SooHoo, N; Samimi, BS; Vyas, R; Boulu, G: Evaluation of the Validity of the Foot Function Index. 52. 2005. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), 21st Annual Summer Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 15.-17.07.2005.
25. Wei, SY; Sullivan, RJ; Davidson, RS: Talo-navicular arthrodesis for residual midfoot deformities of a previously corrected clubfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 21:482-485, 2000.