Dynamic airline scheduling

Transportation Science

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 336-354

  Jiang, Hai ^a   Barnhart, Cynthia ^b  

^a Research Group   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Airline scheduling; Demand stochasticity; Dynamics scheduling

Indexed keywords

PROFITABILITY; SCHEDULING; TRANSPORTATION;

AIRLINE SCHEDULING; DEMAND FORECAST; DYNAMIC SCHEDULING; FLIGHT SCHEDULES; IMPROVED FORECAST; OPERATIONAL CONSTRAINTS; OPTIMIZED SCHEDULE; STOCHASTICITY;

AIR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 70449643039     PISSN: 00411655     EISSN: 15265447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0269     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bandet, P. O. 1994. Armada-hub: An adaption of AF fleet assignment model to take into account the hub structure in CDG. Proc. 34th AGIFORS Annual Sympos., Zandvoort, The Netherlands, 387-392.
2. Barnhart, C., T. S. Kniker, M. Lohatepanont. 2002. Itinerary-based airline fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. 36 (2)199-217.
3. Berge, M. E., C. A. Hopperstad. 1993. Demand driven dispatch: A method for dynamic aircraft capacity assignment, models and algorithms. Oper. Res. 41 (1, Special Issue)153-168.
4. Bish, E. K., R. Suwandechochai, D. R. Bish. 2004. Strategies for managing the flexible capacity in the airline industry. Naval Res. Logist. 51 654-684.
5. Chandler, J., N. Sklarewitz. 2004. Regional update-New airline routes and services, airport expansions, hotel upgrades and international services. Frequent Flyer (December)12-15.
6. Desaulniers, G., J. Desrosiers, B. Rioux, M. Solomon, F. Soumis. 1997. Daily aircraft routing and scheduling. Management Sci. 43 841-854.
7. Donoghue, J. A. 2002. Hub machine. Air Transport World 39 (6)5.
8. Dror, M., P. Trudeau, S. P. Ladany. 1988. Network models for seat allocation on flights. Transportation Res. 22B 239-250.
9. Dumas, J., F. Soumis. 2008. Passenger flow model for airline networks. Transportation Sci. 42 (2)197-207.
10. Etschmaier, M. M., D. F. X. Mathaisel. 1984. Aircraft scheduling-the state of the art. Proc. 24th AGIFORS Annual Sympos., Strasbourg, France, 181-225.
11. Farkas, A. 1995. The influence of network effects and yield management on airline fleet assignment decisions. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
12. Flottau, J. 2003. Lufthansa reorganizes flight operations, "depeaks" Frankfurt. Aviation Daily (November 13)3.
13. Gallego, G., R. Phillips. 2004. Revenue management of flexible products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6 (4)1-17.
14. Glover, F., R. Glover, J. Lorenzo, C. McMillan. 1982. The passengermix problem in the scheduled airlines. Interfaces 12 (3)73-79.
15. Hane, C., C. Barnhart, E. Johnson, R. Marsten, G. Nemhauser, G. Sigismondi. 1995. The fleet assignment problem: Solving a large-scale integer program. Math. Programming 70 211-232.
16. ILOG. 2003. ILOG CPLEX 9.0 User's Manual. Mountain View, CA.
17. Jarrah, A. I. 2000. An efficient airline refleeting model for the incremental modification of planned fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. 34 (4)349-363.
18. Jarrah, A. I., G. Yu, N. Krishnamurthy, A. Rakshit. 1993. A decision support framework for airline cancellations and delays. Transportation Sci. 27 (3)266-280.
19. Jiang, H. 2006. Dynamic airline scheduling and robust airline schedule de-peaking. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
20. Klabjan, D., E. L. Johnson, G. L. Nemhauser, E. Gelman, S. Ramaswamy. 2002. Airline crew scheduling with time windows and plane-count constraints. Transportation Sci. 36 (3)337-348.
21. Kniker, T. 1998. Itinerary-based fleet assignment. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
22. Lan, S., J.-P. Clarke, C. Barnhart. 2006. Planning for robust airline operations: Optimizing aircraft routings and flight departure times to minimize passenger disruptions. Transportation Sci. 40 (1)15-28.
23. Levin, A. 1971. Scheduling and fleet routing models for transportation systems. Transportation Sci. 5 (3)232-255.
24. McDonald, M. 2002. Endangered species? Air Transport World 39 (6)34-38.
25. Ott, J. 2003. "De-peaking" American hubs provides network benefit. Aviation Week Space Tech. 158 (7)53-54.
26. Peterson, R. M. 1986. The penultimate hub airplane. Internal memo, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle.
27. Phillips, B. L., D. W. Boyd, T. A. Grossman. 1991. An algorithm for calculating consistent itinerary flows. Transportation Sci. 25 (3)225-239.
28. Rexing, B., C. Barnhart, T. Kniker, A. Jarrah, N. Krishnamurthy. 2000. Airline fleet assignment with time windows. Transportation Sci. 34 (1)1-20.
29. Rosenberger, J. M., A. J. Schaefer, D. Goldsman, E. L. Johnson. 2002. A stochastic model of airline operations. Transportation Sci. 36 (4)357-377.
30. Sherali, H. D., E. K. Bish, X. Zhu. 2005. Polyhedral analysis and algorithms for a demand-driven refleeting model for aircraft assignment. Transportation Sci. 39 (3)349-366.
31. Soumis, F., J. Ferland, J.-M. Rousseau. 1981. MAPUM: A model for assigning passengers to a flight schedule. Transportation Res., Part A 15 A 155-161.
32. Talluri, K. 2001. Airline revenue management with passenger routing control: A new model with solution approaches. Internat. J. Services Tech. Management 2 (1/2)102-115.
33. Talluri, K. T. 1996. Swapping applications in a daily airline fleet assignment. Transportation Sci. 30 (3)237-248.
34. Thengvall, B. G., J. F. Bard, G. Yu. 2000. Balancing user preferences for aircraft schedule recovery during irregular operations. IIE Trans. 32 181-193.
35. United Airlines. 2006. UAL corporation reports fourth quarter and full year 2005 results. Accessed January 27, http://www.united.com/press/detail/0, 6862, 53614-1, 00.html.
36. Warburg, V., T. Hanson, A. Larsen, H. Norman, E. Anderson. 2008. J. Air Transport Management 14 (4)163-167.
37. Yu, G., S. Luo. 1997. On the airline schedule perturbation problem caused by the ground delay program. Transportation Sci. 31 (4)298-311.