Supplier post performance evaluation: The effects of buyer preference weight variance

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 47, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 4351-4371

  Ross, Anthony ^a   Buffa, Frank P ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Buyer supplier dyads; DEA; Performance evaluation; Relationships

Indexed keywords

ASSURANCE REGION; EVALUATION MODELS; FACTOR WEIGHT; PERFORMANCE DATA; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE FACTORS; RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH TOOLS; SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS; SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION THEORY;

SALES;

EID: 70449637515     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540801968633     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anderson, J., Hakansson, H. and Johanson, J., 1994. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-15.
2. Allen, R., Athanassaopoulos, A., Dyson, R. and Thanassaoulis, E., 1997. Weights restrictions and value judgments in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development, and future directions. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 13-34.
3. Barbarosoglu, G. and Yazgac, T., 1997. An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38, 14-21.
4. Cakravastia, A. and Takahashi, K., 2004. Integrated model for supplier selection and negotiation in a make-to-order environment. International Journal of Production Research, 42, 4457-4474.
5. Chan, F.T., 2003. Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: An analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research, 41, 3549-3579.
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Lewin, A. and Seiford, L., 1994. Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Dordrecht, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. and Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
8. Chen, I. and Paulraj, A., 2004. Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 119-150.
9. Chen, K.S. and Chen, K.L., 2006. Supplier selection by testing the process capability index. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 589-600.
10. Degraeve, Z., Labro, E. and Roodhooft, F., 2000. An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 34-52.
11. Degraeve, Z. and Roodhooft, F., 1999. Effectively selecting suppliers using total cost of ownership. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35, 5-10.
12. Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H., 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganisational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.
13. Ernst, D. and Bamford, J., 2005. Your alliances are too stable. Harvard Business Review, 83, 133-140.
14. Forker, L., Mendez, D. and Hershauer, J., 2007. Total quality management in the supply chain: what is its impact on performance. International Journal of Production Research., 35 (6), 1681-1702.
15. Frazier, G. and Summers, J., 1984 Inter-firm influence strategies and their application within distribution channels. Journal of Marketing, 48, 43-55.
16. Gadde, L.E. and Hakansson, H., 1994. The changing role of purchasing: reconsidering three strategic issues. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 1, 27-35.
17. Gregory, R.E., 1986. Source selection: a matrix approach. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22, 24-29.
18. Hagel, J. and Brown, J., 2005. Productive friction: how difficult business partnerships can accelerate innovation. Harvard Business Review, 83, 82-90.
19. Hahn, C.K., Watts, C.A. and Kim, K.Y., 1990. The supply development program: a conceptual model. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26, 2-7.
20. Hinkle, C.L., Robinson, P. and Green, P., 1969. Vendor evaluation using group analysis. Journal of Purchasing, August, 49-58.
21. John, G. and Reve, T., 1982. The reliability and validity of key informant data from dyadic relationships in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 517-524.
22. Kleinsorge, I.A., Schary, P.B. and Tanner, R.D., 1992. Data envelopment analysis for monitoring customer-supplier relationships. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 11, 357-372.
23. Lambert, D.M., Lewis, M.C. and Stock, J., 1993. How shippers select and evaluate general commodities LTL motor carriers. Journal of Business Logistics, 14, 131-144.
24. Lamberson, L., Diederich, D. and Wuori, J., 1976. Quantitative vendor evaluation. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Spring, 19-28.
25. Lee, E.-K., Ha, S. and Kim, S.K., 2001. Supplier selection and management system considering relationships in supply chain management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 307-318.
26. Liker, J. and Choi, T.-Y., 2004. Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review, 82, 104-112.
27. Mandal, A. and Deshmukh, S., 1994. Vendor selection using interpretative structural modelling (ISM). International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14, 52-59.
28. Mohanty, R. and Deshmukh, S., 1993. Use of analytic hierarchy process for evaluating sources of supply. International Journal of Physical Distance and Logistics Management, 23, 22-28.
29. Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K. and Chao, C., 1996. Chinese purchasing managers' p and trade-offs in supplier selection and performance evaluation. Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 115-124.
30. Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N. and Deshmukh, S., 2002. A multicriteria group decisionmaking model for supplier rating. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Fall, 22-35.
31. Narasimhan, R., 1983. An analytical approach to supplier selection. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 19, 27-32.
32. Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S. and Mendez, D., 2001. Supplier evaluation and rationalisation via data envelopment analysis: an empirical examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37, 28-37.
33. Pan, A.C., 1989. Allocation of order quantity among suppliers. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 25, 36-39.
34. Patton, W., 1996. Use of human judgment models in industrial buyer's vendor selection decisions. Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 135-149.
35. Pelled, L. and Adler, S., 1994. Antecedents of intergroup conflict in multifunctional product development teams: a conceptual model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41, 21-32.
36. Petroni, A. and Braglia, M., 2000. Vendor selection using principal component analysis. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36, 63-69.
37. Purdy, L. and Safayeni, F., 2000. Strategies for supplier evaluation: a framework for potential advantages and limitations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47, 435-443.
38. Ramanathan, R., 2006. Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytical hierarch process. Computing and Operational Research, 33, 1289-1307.
39. Reiner, G. and Hofmann, P., 2006. Efficiency analysis of supply chain processes. International Journal of Production Research, 44 (23), 5065-5087.
40. Sarkis, J., 2000. A comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multicriteria decision tool. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 543-557.
41. Sarkis, J. and Talluri, S., 2002. A model for strategic supplier selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38, 18-28.
42. Sevkli, M., Lenny-Koh, S., Zaim, S., Demirbag, M. and Tatoglu, E., 2007. An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research, 45, 1973-1991.
43. Seydel, J., 2006. Data envelopment analysis for decision support. Industrial Management Data Systems, 106, 81-95.
44. Siying, W., Jinlong, Z. and Zhicheng, L. 1997. A supplier-selecting system using a neural network. 1997 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems, 28-31 October 1997, Beijing, China, New York: ICIPS, 468-471.
45. Swink, M. and Zsidisin, G., 2006. On the benefits and risks of focused commitment to suppliers. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 4223-4240.
46. Talluri, S., 2002a. The use of efficient marginal costs in purchasing decisions. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38, 4-10.
47. Talluri, S., 2002b. A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 171-180.
48. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., 2003. Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 146, 543-559.
49. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R. and Nair, A., 2006. Vendor performance with supply risk: a chancecostrained DEA approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 100, 212-230.
50. Talluri, S. and Sarkis, J., 2002. A model for performance monitoring of suppliers. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (16), 4257-4269.
51. Timmerman, E., 1986. An approach to vendor performance evaluation. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 22, 2-8.
52. Tone, K., 1999. On returns to scale under weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis. Research Report Series I-99-10003 National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
53. Turner, I., 1988. An independent system for the evaluation of contract tenders. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 551-561.
54. Verma, R. and Pullman, M., 1998. An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega, 26, 739-750.
55. Weber, C.A. and Current, J., 1993. A multiobjective approach to vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 54, 2-18.
56. Weber, C.A., Current, J. and Benton, W.C., 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2-18.
57. Weber, C.A., Current, J. and Desai, A., 1998. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 208-223.
58. Weber, C.A. and Ellram, L., 1993. Supplier selection using multi-objective programming: a decision support systems approach. International Journal of Physical Distance and Logistics Management, 23 (2), 3-14.
59. Weber, C.A. and Desai, A., 1996. Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel co-ordinates representation: a negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, 90, 142-155.
60. Wind, Y. and Robinson, P., 1968. The determination of vendor selection: the evaluation function approach. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, August, 29-41.