The five assessment issues you meet when you go to heaven

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 303-310

  Groth Marnat, Gary ^a  

^a Pacifica Graduate Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPING BEHAVIOR; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PERSONALITY TEST; PREDICTION; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOTHERAPY; READING; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 70449629214     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223890902935662     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Aegisd́ottir, S., White, M., Spengler, P. M., Maugherman, A. S., Angerson, L. A., Cook, R. S., et al. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 341-382.
2. Albom,M. (2003). The five people you meet when you go to heaven. New York: Hyperion.
3. American Psychological Association. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49, 677-680.
4. Andrews, H. B. (2001). Back to basics: Psychotherapy is an interpersonal process. Australian Psychologist, 35, 107-114.
5. Beech, A. R., Fisher, D. D., & Thornton, D. (2003). Risk assessment of sex offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 4, 339-352.
6. Beutler, L. E. (1989). Differential treatment selection: The role of diagnosis in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 26, 271-281.
7. Beutler, L. E. (in press). Making science matter in clinical practice: Redefining psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice.
8. Beutler, L. E., Albanese, A. L., Fisher, D., Karno, M., Sandowicz, M.,Williams, O. B., et al. (1999, August). Selecting and matching to patient variables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Braga, Portugal.
9. Beutler, L. E., Clarkin, I. F., & Bongar, B. (2000). Guidelines for the systematic treatment selection of the depressed patient. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Beutler, L. E., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Integrative assessment of adult personality. New York: Guilford.
11. Beutler, L. E., Moleiro, C., Malik, M., Harwood, T. M., Romanelli, R., Gallagher-Thompson, D., et al. (2003). A comparison of the Dodo, EST, and ATI indicators co-morbid stimulant dependent, depressed patients. Clinically Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10, 69-85.
12. Beutler, L. E.,&Williams, O. B. (1999). Systematic treatment selection (STS): A software package for treatment planning. Ventura, CA: Center for Behavioral Health Technology.
13. Board of Professional Affairs Committee on Professional Practice & Standards. (1999). Guidelines for psychological evaluations in child protection matters. American Psychologist, 54, 586-593.
14. Bornstein, R. F. (2009). Heisenberg, Kandinsky, and the heteromethod convergence problem: Lessons from within and beyond psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 1-8.
15. Brenner, E. (2003). Consumer-focused psychological assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 240-247.
16. Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G.,&Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2: Manual for administration and scoring (2nd ed.).Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17. Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141-154.
18. Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system: Vol.1. Basic foundations (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
19. Finn, S. E. (2007). In our client's shoes: Theory and techniques of therapeutic assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Fischer, C. (2009). Individualizing psychological assessment (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Fisher, D. C., Beutler, L. E., & Williams, O. B. (1999). Making assessment relevant to treatment planning: The STS Clinician Rating Form. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 825-842.
22. Forbey, J. D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2007). Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 computerized adaptive version. Psychological Assessment, 19, 14-24.
23. Fredrickson, B. (2006). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Slega (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology. (pp. 85-103). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Garb, H. N. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 1, 67-89.
25. Gorske, T. M., & Smith, S. R. (2008). Collaborative therapeutic neuropscyhological assessment. New York: Springer.
26. Gold, S. D., & Marx, B. P. (2006). Analogue and virtual reality assessment. In M. Hersen (Ed.), Clinician's handbook of child behavioral assessment (pp. 81-102). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
27. Groth-Marnat, G. (2000). Visions of clinical assessment: Then, now, and a brief history of the future. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 349-365.
28. Groth-Marnat, G. (2003a). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
29. Groth-Marnat, G. (2003b). The psychological report. In R. Fernandez Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (pp. 812-817). London: Sage.
30. Groth-Marnat, G. (2006). The psychological report: A review of current controversies. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 73-81.
31. Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment (5th ed.).New York: Wiley.
32. Groth-Marnat, G., Gottheil, E., Liu, W., Clinton, D., & Beutler, L. E. (2008). Personality and treatment planning for psychotherapy: The Systematic Treatment Selection Model. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of personality and testing (pp. 620-634). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Groth-Marnat, G., & Horvath, L. S. (2006). The psychological report: A review of current controversies. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 73-81.
34. Groth-Marnat, G., Roberts, R., & Beutler, L. E. (2001). Client characteristics and psychotherapy: Perspectives, support, interactions, and implications. Australian Psychologist, 36, 115-121.
35. Grove,W.M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E.,&Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A metanalysis. Psychnoloical Assessment, 12, 19-30.
36. Harvey, V. S. (1997). Improving the readability of psychological reports. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 271-274.
37. Harvey,V. S. (2006).Variables affecting the clarity of reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 5-18.
38. Harwood, T. M., & Williams, O. (2003). Identifying treatment relevant assessment: The STS. In L. E. Beutler & G. Groth-Marnat (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (pp. 65-81). New York: Guilford.
39. Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relations between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139-149.
40. Houts, A. C. (2002). Discovery, invention, and the expansion of the modern Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals of Mental Disorders. In L. E. Beutler & M. L. Malik (Eds.), Rethinking the DSM: A Psychological perspective (pp. 17-68). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. Ku, J., Cho, W., Kim, J.-J., Peled, A., Wiederhold, B. K., Wiederhold, M. D., et al. (2003).Avirtual environment investigating schizophrenic patients' characteristics: Assessment of cognitive and navigation ability. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 397-404.
42. Lambert, M. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapies. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94-129). New York: Basic Books.
43. Lewak, R. W., Marks, P. A., & Nelson, G. E. (1990). Therapist guide to the MMPI and MMPI-2. Muncie, IN: Accelerated Development.
44. Lichtenberger, E. O. (2006). Computer utilization and clinical judgment in psychological assessment reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 19-32.
45. Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 995-1008.
46. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47. Meehl, P. E. (1956). Wanted-A good cookbook. American Psychologist, 11, 262-272.
48. Meyer, G. J. (2007, March). Steps towards a lean, clean, assessment machine. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Personality Assessment, Arlington, VA.
49. Meyer, G. J., Erdberg, P., & Shaffer, T. W. (2007). Toward international normative reference data for the Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, S201-S216.
50. Mihura, J. (2008, March). A review of the validity research on the Rorschach Comprehensive System variables. Workshop presented at the Society for Personality Assessment conference, New Orleans, LA.
51. Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P., Banks, S., Grisso, T., et al. (2005). An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 56, 810-815.
52. Oei, T. P. S., & Shuttlewood, G. J. (1997). Comparison of specific and nonspecific factors in a group of cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Behavioural Therapeutics and Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 221-231.
53. Paul, G. L. (1967). Behavior modification research: Design and tactics. In C.M. Franks (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 300-334). New York: Basic Books.
54. Piasecki, T. M., Hufford, M. R., Solhan, M., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: Rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers. Psychological Assessment, 19, 25-43.
55. Rosqvist, J., Sundsmo, A., MacLane, C., Cullen, K., Norling, D. C., Davies,M., et al. (2006). Analogue and virtual reality assessment. In M. Hersen (Ed.), Clinician's handbook of adult behavioral assessment (pp. 43-63). New York: Elsevier.
56. Schultheis, M. T., Himelstein, J., & Rizzo, A. A. (2002). Virtual reality and neuropsychology: Upgrading the current tools. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17, 378-394.
57. Seligman, M., Linley, P. A.,&Joseph, A. (2004). Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
58. Simon, R. I., & Tardiff, K. (2008). Textbook of violence assessment and management. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press.
59. Snyder, C. R., Ritschel, L. A., Rand, K. L., & Berg, C. J. (2006). Balancing psychological assessments: Including strengths and hope in client reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 33-46.
60. Tallent, N. (1959). On individualizing the psychologist's clinical evaluation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 14, 243-244.
61. Tallent, N., & Reiss, W. J. (1959a). Multidisciplinary views on the preparation of written psychological reports: I. Spontaneous suggestions for content. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 218-221.
62. Tallent, N., & Reiss, W. J. (1959b). Multidisciplinary views on the preparation of written psychological reports: II. Acceptability of common content variables and styles of expression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 273-274.
63. Tallent, N., & Reiss, W. J. (1959c). Multidisciplinary views on the preparation of written psychological reports: III. The trouble with psychological reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 244-246.
64. Tolman, A. O., & Rotzien, A. L. (2007). Conducting risk evaluations for future violence: Ethical practice is possible. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 71-79.
65. Vazire, S. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Personality Research, 40, 472-481.
66. Wagner, E. E. (2001). The Logical Rorschach: A brief scoring method for psychopathology. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
67. Wampold, B. E. (2000). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stitch, F., Benson, K., & Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, "All must have prizes." Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203-215.
69. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale-III: Administration and scoring manual (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation