Reaction mechanisms of H2 reduction and N2O decomposition on Fe/ZSM-5 zeolite: A density functional theoretical study

Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Volumn 113, Issue 42, 2009, Pages 18184-18190

  Yang, Gang ^a,b   Zhou, Lijun ^b   Liu, Xianchun ^a   Han, Xiuwen ^a   Bao, Xinhe ^a  

^a DALIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS   (China)

^b NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-DENSITY; ADSORPTION ENERGIES; ADSORPTION MODES; B3LYP DENSITY FUNCTIONAL; DECOMPOSITION PROCESS; DECOMPOSITION REACTION; FE/ZSM-5; FE/ZSM-5 CATALYST; HIGH SPIN STATE; MODERATE TEMPERATURE; PARALLEL MODE; PRE-TREATMENT; REACTION ACTIVITY; REACTION MECHANISM; REDUCTION PROCESS; SPIN STATE; THEORETICAL STUDY; ZSM-5 ZEOLITES;

ADSORPTION; ENERGY BARRIERS; IRON COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN; SILICATE MINERALS; SPIN DYNAMICS;

ZEOLITES;

EID: 70449595494     PISSN: 19327447     EISSN: 19327455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp906426j     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Suzuki, E.; Nakashiro, K.; Ono, K. Chem. Lett. 1988, 6, 953.
2. Panov, G. I.; Sobolev, V. I.; Kharitonov, A. S. J. Mol. Catal. 1990, 61, 85.
3. Panov, G. I.; Uriarte, A. K.; Rodkin, M. A.; Sobolev, V. I. Catal. Today 1998, 41, 365.
4. Meloni, D.; Monaci, R.; Solinas, V.; Berlier, G.; Bordiga, S.; Rossetti, I.; Oliva, C.; Forni, L. J. Catal. 2003, 214, 169.
5. Dubkov, K. A.; Ovanesyan, N. S.; Shteinman, A. A.; Starokon, E. V.; Panov, G. I. J. Catal. 2002, 207, 341.
6. Berrier, E.; Ovsitser, O.; Kondratenko, E. V.; Schwidder, M.; Grnert, W.; Brchner, A. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 67.
7. Yuranov, I.; Bulushev, D. A.; Renken, A.; Kiwi-Minsker, L. Appl. Catal., A 2007, 319, 128.
8. Zecchina, A.; Rivallan, M.; Berlier, G.; Lamberti, C.; Ricchiardi, G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 3483.
9. Dubkov, K. A.; Ovanesyan, N. S.; Shteinman, A. A.; Starokon, E. V.; Panov, G. I. J. Catal. 2002, 207, 341.
10. Jia, J. F.; Pillai, K. S.; Sachtler, W. M. H. J. Catal. 2004, 221, 119.
11. Zhu, Q.; Hensen, J. M.; Mojet, B. L.; van Wolput, J. H. M. C.; van Santen, R. A. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1232.
12. Martinez, A.; Goursot, A.; Coq, B.; Delahay, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 8823.
13. Kondratenko, E. V.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 22586.
14. Yakovlev, A. L.; Zhidomirov, G. M.; van Santen, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 12297.
15. Yoshizawa, K.; Shiota, Y.; Takashi, K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11404.
16. Pantu, P.; Pabchanda, S.; Limtrakul, J. ChemPhysChem 2004, 5, 1901.
17. Ryder, J. A.; Chakraborty, A. K.; Bell, A. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7059.
18. Heyden, A.; Peters, B.; Bell, A. T.; Keil, F. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1857.
19. Heyden, A.; Hansen, N.; Bell, A. T.; Keil, F. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 17096.
20. Fellah, M. F.; Onal, I. Catal. Today 2007, 137, 410.
21. Hansen, N.; Heyden, A.; Bell, A. T.; Keil, F. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 2092.
22. Hansen, N.; Heyden, A.; Bell, A. T.; Keil, F. J. J. Catal. 2007, 248, 213.
23. Rivallan, M.; Ricchiardi, G.; Bordiga, S.; Zecchina, A. J. Catal. 2009, 264, 104.
24. Mojet, B. L.; Eckert, J.; van Santen, R. A.; Albinati, A.; Lechner, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8147.
25. Berlier, G.; Gribov, E.; Cocina, D.; Spoto, G.; Zecchina, A. J. Catal. 2006, 238, 243.
26. Yang, G.; Zhou, L. J.; Liu, X. C.; Han, X. W.; Bao, X. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 22295.
27. Palomino, G. T.; Llop, M. R.; Areán, C. O. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 2884.
28. Torres, F. J.; Civalleri, B.; Terentyev, A.; Ugliengo, P.; Pisani, C. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1871.
29. Torres, F. J.; Ugliengo, P.; Civalleri, B.; Terentyev, A.; Pisani, C. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 746.
30. Yang, G.; Zhou, D. H.; Liu, X. C.; Han, X. W.; Bao, X. H. J. Mol. Struct. 2006, 797, 131.
31. Yang, G.; Zhou, L. J.; Liu, X. C.; Han, X. W.; Bao, X. H. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 1981.
32. Choi, S. H.; Wood, B. R.; Ryder, J. A.; Bell, A. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11843.
33. Sung, C. Y.; Broadlelt, L. J.; Snurr, R. Q. Catal. Toady 2008, 136, 64.
34. Sung, C. Y.; Broadlelt, L. J.; Snurr, R. Q. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 15643.
35. Ren, J; Liu, S. S.; Li, Z.; Lu, X. L.; Xie, K. C. Appl. Catal. A: General 2009, 366, 93.
36. Olson, D. H.; Kokotallo, G. T.; Lawton, S. L.; Meier, W. M. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2238.
37. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098.
38. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
39. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, Revision A.9; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
40. Apart from the default B3LYP/B1 method described in Section 2.2, another two basis sets were used to optimize the H2/ZFeIII-A structure. The Fe element in these two basis sets was treated the same, using the LANL2DZ effective core potential (ECP) and LANL2DZ basis set for the core and valence electrons, respectively. All of the other elements were described with the 6-31G(d) and 6-311++G(d,p) basis sets, and such combinations of ECP and basis sets were referred to as B3 and B4, respectively. The Ha-Hb, Fe-Hb, and Oa-Ha distances were optimized at 0.753, 2.304, and 2.767 Å by B1, 0.749, 2.441, and 2.930 Å by B3, as well as 0.755, 2.269, and 2.772 Å by B4, respectively. It was found that the calculated data of B3LYP/B1 and B3LYP/B4 methods are comparable. In addition, the geometries of the zeolite fragment obtained with the three different basis sets are quite similar to each other; e.g., the Fe-Oa distances were optimized at 1.669, 1.671, and 1.677 Å by B1, B3, and B4, respectively. Accordingly, the 6-31G(d) basis set is qualified to treat the zeolite structures, consistent with the results of N2O decomposition on Fe(II)/ ZSM-5 zeolite discussed in Section 3.2.1.
41. Glendening, E. D.; Reed, A. E.; Carpenter, J. E.; Weinhold, F. NBO Version 3.1.
42. Wiberg, K. B. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 1083.
43. Yang, G.; Guan, J; Zhou, L. J.; Liu, X. C.; Han, X. W.; Bao, X. H. Mircopor. Mesopor. Mater. 2008, 113, 583.
44. Herzberg, G. Electronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Polyatomic Molecules; Van Nostrand: New York, 1966.
45. Solimannejad, M.; Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 2077.