Accuracy of self-reported breast cancer among women undergoing mammography

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 583-592

  Abraham, Linn ^a   Geller, Berta M ^b   Yankaskas, Bonnie C ^c   Bowles, Erin J A ^a   Karliner, Leah S ^d   Taplin, Stephen H ^e   Miglioretti, Diana L ^a,f  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Self report; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER REGISTRY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ETHNICITY; FAMILIAL CANCER; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LUNG CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70449589766     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0375-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. SA Newell A Girgis RW Sanson-Fisher NJ Savolainen BA Hons 1999 The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population: a critical review Am J Prev Med 17 211 229 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00069-0 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00069-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmvFajtQ%3D%3D 10987638 (Pubitemid 29424201)
2. CT Schrijvers K Stronks DH van de Mheen JW Coebergh JP Mackenbach 1994 Validation of cancer prevalence data from a postal survey by comparison with cancer registry records Am J Epidemiol 139 408 414 1:STN:280: DyaK2c7lt1Kntg%3D%3D 8109575
3. MM Bergmann T Byers DS Freedman A Mokdad 1998 Validity of self-reported cancers in a prospective cohort study in comparison with data from state cancer registries Am J Epidemiol 147 556 562 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7otVCktQ%3D%3D 9521182
4. MM Desai ML Bruce RA Desai BG Druss 2001 Validity of self-reported cancer history: a comparison of health interview data and cancer registry records Am J Epidemiol 153 299 306 10.1093/aje/153.3.299 10.1093/aje/153.3.299 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzmtleqsg%3D%3D 11157418 (Pubitemid 32958655)
5. A Parikh-Patel M Allen WE Wright California Teachers Study Steering Committee 2003 Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study Am J Epidemiol 157 539 545 10.1093/aje/kwg006 10.1093/aje/kwg006 12631544 (Pubitemid 36292913)
6. FJ Dominguez C Lawrence EF Halpern, et al. 2007 Accuracy of self-reported personal history of cancer in an outpatient breast center J Genet Couns 16 341 345 10.1007/s10897-006-9067-y 10.1007/s10897-006-9067-y 17508275 (Pubitemid 46878627)
7. EG Poon JS Haas AL Puopolo, et al. 2004 Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms J Gen Intern Med 19 316 323 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30357.x 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30357.x 15061740 (Pubitemid 38541511)
8. JF Kerner M Yedidia D Padgett, et al. 2003 Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among Black women Prev Med 37 92 101 10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00087-2 10.1016/S0091-7435(03) 00087-2 12855208 (Pubitemid 36802373)
9. WE Barlow E White R Ballard-Barbash, et al. 2006 Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 98 1204 1214 16954473
10. R Ballard-Barbash SH Taplin BC Yankaskas, et al. 1997 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 1001 1008 1:STN:280:DyaK2svltlygsw%3D%3D 9308451
11. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, National Cancer Institute (2008) Available at: http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/. Accessed 3 Dec 2008
12. United States Census 2000 (2007) Geographic products and information. Available at: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/census2k.html. Accessed 3 Dec 2008
13. ® users guide, version 9. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
14. VL Champion JK Springston TW Zollinger, et al. 2006 Comparison of three interventions to increase mammography screening in low income African American women Cancer Detect Prev 30 535 544 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.10.003 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.10.003 17110056 (Pubitemid 44828294)
15. TA Battaglia K Roloff MA Posner KM Freund 2007 Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. A patient navigation intervention Cancer 109 2 suppl 359 367 10.1002/cncr.22354 10.1002/cncr.22354 17123275 (Pubitemid 46106220)
16. JG Elmore MB Barton VM Moceri S Polk PJ Arena SW Fletcher 1998 Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations N Engl J Med 338 1089 1096 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ps1Kitw%3D%3D 9545356 (Pubitemid 28227478)
17. L Wiechmann HM Kuerer 2008 The molecular journey from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer Cancer 112 2130 2142 10.1002/cncr.23430 10.1002/cncr.23430 18383519 (Pubitemid 351628621)
18. AM Nápoles-Springer JC Livaudais J Bloom S Hwang CP Kaplan 2007 Information exchange and decision making in the treatment of Latina and white women with ductal carcinoma in situ J Psychosoc Oncol 25 19 36 10.1300/J077v25n04-02 10.1300/J077v25n04-02 18032263 (Pubitemid 350166021)
19. S Prinjha J Evans A McPherson 2006 Women's information needs about ductal carcinoma in situ before mammographic screening and after diagnosis: a qualitative study J Med Screen 13 110 114 10.1258/096914106778440581 10.1258/096914106778440581 17007650 (Pubitemid 44452721)
20. CI Li KE Malone BS Saltzman JR Daling 2006 Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001 Cancer 106 2104 2112 10.1002/cncr.21864 10.1002/cncr.21864 16604564 (Pubitemid 43673230)
21. J Cuzick JF Forbes I Sestak International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I Investigators, et al. 2007 Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer-96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial J Natl Cancer Inst 99 272 282 10.1093/jnci/djk049 10.1093/jnci/djk049 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjsVeitrs%3D 17312304 (Pubitemid 47073490)
22. KA Cronin B Yu M Krapcho, et al. 2005 Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States Cancer Causes Control 16 701 712 10.1007/s10552-005-0693-8 10.1007/s10552-005-0693-8 16049809 (Pubitemid 41110961)